Publications & Podcasts

New Rules for Apprentices on Energy Projects Come with Uncertainty for Contractors and Developers

April 21, 2022 Alerts and Newsletters

On January 1, 2021, a new law went into effect setting benchmarks for use of apprentices on energy generation facility construction projects. Enacted in 2019, the law was part of “An Act to Establish a Green New Deal for Maine” and can be found at 26 M.R.S.A. §§ 3501 and 3502. Under the new law, employers engaged in construction energy generation facilities are required to use a prescribed number of apprentices. Beginning on January 1, 2021, “10% of all persons employed in the construction" of an energy generation facility must be apprentices. That percentage increases to 17.5% on January 1, 2025, and then increases again to 20% on January 1, 2027.

Under the regulations the phrase “persons employed in the construction” means “all persons employed in an apprenticeable occupation during any phase or time period of an operation to construct a generation facility, or during the entire duration of such an operation or during some combination of those periods of time.” This definition narrows the project workforce to which these apprentice percentage requirements apply to those jobs that traditionally offer an apprenticeship path to career development. [1]

The statute also authorized the Maine Department of Labor (MDOL) to develop and issue regulations for the implementation and enforcement of the new law. This rule-making process is important because the statute itself offers little guidance about how contractors should comply with the law or what to do if they are unable find enough apprentices. The MDOL’s regulations for the new law were finally issued on January 15, 2022. These new regulations can be found here. Unfortunately, the regulations provide little guidance for affected contractors and subcontractors meaning that there is likely to be some confusion over how the law will be enforced.

The primary concern with the implementation of this law is the general lack of available apprentices and apprenticeship programs within the State of Maine. Maine contractors are open-shop for the most part. Although a few larger Maine-based non-union contractors have apprentice programs up and running, most Maine-based contractors will be at a serious disadvantage in complying with these new laws in the short term. Industry associations such as Associated General Contractors (AGC) of Maine have played a significant role in development of apprentice programs for its members and the industry as a whole. Upstart apprentice programs present a challenge due to Maine’s relatively small population and the limited number of young people interested in entering the trades.

The regulations do allow contractors and subcontractors an opportunity to claim that “an insufficient number of qualified apprentices were available to meet the required percentage.” In order to prove this, the regulations require that an employer show that it “made reasonable efforts to find and employ” apprentices. “Reasonable efforts” may “include evidence of having contacted or attempted to contact the Maine Apprenticeship Program, sponsors of apprenticeship training programs such as labor organizations and employers with a presence in Maine, or other appropriate sources.” How MDOL interpret “reasonable efforts” remains to be seen.

The regulations also set forth guidelines for employer self-monitoring and reporting. These rules require that:

  • Before starting a project or a “phase” of a project, an employer must submit to Bureau of Labor Standards (Bureau) within MDOL “a plan for locating and employing a sufficient number of qualified apprentices.”
  • Upon completion of each phase of the construction project, “the employer must submit to the Bureau an interim report of the employer’s efforts to employ qualified apprentices including a clear explanation if they failed to hire a sufficient number of qualified apprentices during that phase of the project.”
  • Upon completion of the project, “the employer must submit a final report also including a clear explanation if they failed to hire a sufficient number of qualified apprentices during the entire project.”

The regulations offer no guidance about what qualifies as a “phase” of an energy facility construction project other than providing that an employer’s “established pay period” may be considered a “phase”. As a practical matter, this term does not have a generally accepted meaning in the industry.

The regulations also include record-keeping requirements including that payroll records must be “available to a Bureau representative on each site covered by the statute” or, if not at the site, “within 10 miles of the site while the project is active”, that the records “be current within three days of the latest pay period that was paid by the contractor or sub-contractor”, and that the records “be retained, preserved, and open to inspection by the Bureau for at least three years following completion of the project.”

Requiring storage at the site or within 10 miles of the site suggests a requirement for the maintenance of paper records. These requirements seem out of step with current electronic record-keeping practices. It seems unreasonable to fault a contractor subject to these rules for storing records electronically on a server residing at its home office.

Finally, the statue allows the Bureau to assess fines of between $50 and $200 per violation. According to the regulations, “[e]ach day a sufficient number of apprentices are not employed in accordance with the law and these rules is a separate violation.”

The goal of using more apprentices on energy construction projects is laudable. Unfortunately, it may be difficult for contractors to comply with the law without further guidance and there is the potential for there to be significant confusion and disagreement over its enforcement. At this point in time, we are not aware of any efforts on MDOL’s part to take any enforcement action on these new rules.

If you have any questions about navigating this new law and its accompanying regulations, please reach out to a construction law attorney at Verrill.


[1] Under 26 M.R.S.A. §3201(2) "apprenticeable occupation" is “an occupation that is specified by industry and that:

A. Involves skills that are customarily learned in a practical way through a structured, systematic program of on-the-job supervised learning;

B. Is clearly identified and commonly recognized throughout an industry;

C. Involves manual, mechanical or technical skills and knowledge that, in accordance with the industry standard for the occupation, require the completion of at least 2,000 hours of on-the-job learning to attain; and

D. Requires related instruction.”

Firm Highlights

Matter

Verrill Helps Hancock Solar Project Obtain MDEP Permit, Protect Upland Sandpipers

The 14-megawatt Hancock Solar project in the town of Hancock, Maine has obtained its Site Law permit from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Verrill assisted the project with environmental permitting, which included the...

Blog

Four Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Chambers & Partners for Energy and Environmental Law in Maine

Verrill attorneys Juliet T. Browne, James I. Cohen, Gordon R. Smith, and Mathew J. Todaro were recently recognized for energy and environmental law in Maine in the 2022 Chambers & Partners Guide . Chambers...

Blog

Kelsey McCutcheon Selected to Join the Environmental Law Institute’s (ELI) Emerging Leaders Initiative

Verrill associate Kelsey McCutcheon has been selected to join the Environmental Law Institute’s (ELI) Emerging Leaders Initiative. The Environmental Law Institute is a non-profit, non-partisan organization, that seeks to "make law work for people...

News

31 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in 2022 Chambers & Partners Guide

Publication/Podcast

Amplify Your Process Safety Podcast with Mathew Todaro

Blog

NextEra Subsidiary Fined $8 Million under MBTA for Eagle Deaths at Wind Power Projects in Western U.S.

The U.S. Department of Justice announced that ESI Energy LLC (ESI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Nextera Energy Resources LLC, pleaded guilty to violating the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and acknowledged at least...

Blog

Verrill Partner Mathew Todaro Presents at The National Safety Council (NSC) of Northern New England’s 51st Annual New Hampshire Safety & Health Conference

The National Safety Council (NSC) of Northern New England recently held its 51 st Annual New Hampshire Safety & Health Conference in Nashua. The two-day conference began on June 7 th and featured keynote...

News

Verrill Welcomes Attorney Clayton Brite to Firm’s Real Estate Group

Blog

Intertidal Court Victory for Property Rights, Marine Conservation, and Public Participation

The Maine Superior Court has dismissed all claims against five intertidal landowners represented by Verrill in Masucci v. Judy’s Moody, LLC . The landowners had been sued because they contacted Maine Marine Patrol to...

Blog

Maine Public Utilities Commission to Receive Bids for Northern Maine Transmission and Renewable Generation Projects

On or before May 2, 2022, the Maine Public Utilities Commission has requested bids for proposed transmission and generation resources that would boost energy exports from northern Maine. The northern Maine region has long...

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700