Publications & Podcasts

U.S. Supreme Court Asked to Review Zero Emissions Credit Schemes

February 22, 2019 Alerts and Newsletters

In two related cases, Petitioners are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down state generator subsidies that Petitioners argue distort competitive wholesale power markets that are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the Federal Power Act (FPA). Both cases concern "zero emission credits" (ZEC) schemes, one in Illinois and one in New York, that subsidize nuclear power plants. These ZEC subsidies allow otherwise uncompetitive nuclear plants to stay profitable and continue to operate, even if they fail to receive sufficient compensation in wholesale power auctions. Both the Second and Seventh Circuits have upheld the ZEC nuclear power subsidies.

Should the Supreme Court accept the cases, it would be a follow up to the Court's 2016 decision in Hughes v. Talen, in which the Court ruled that a Maryland generator subsidy program was preempted by the FPA. Under Maryland's program, generators would receive a set price for energy, regardless of the outcome of the wholesale auction, but they were nevertheless required to bid into the wholesale auction and be accepted as a winning resource. Because of the specific nature of that program, the subsidized generators' only incentive was to bid as low as possible in order to clear the auction. Thus, the program had the clear effect of distorting the wholesale power market, as generators were not bidding into the market based on their true costs to deliver power.

The Court's holding in Hughes is narrow: it only prohibits states from implementing a subsidy program that ties compensation to participation in the wholesale market. The ZEC schemes in New York and Illinois were drafted to avoid the Hughes problem but accomplish the same goal. Petitioners are asking the Court to expand the Hughes holding to include programs that have the necessary effect of distorting wholesale markets, albeit in a way that is not directly tethered to participation in the wholesale market.

According to Petitioners, the ZEC schemes have exactly the same effect as the Maryland program. The nuclear plants will receive a guaranteed rate, regardless of the FERC-approved auction rates. Petitioners further argue that, although not explicitly required to participate in wholesale markets, due to the nature of nuclear power, nuclear plants must run continuously and will inevitably sell all of their output in wholesale markets. Thus, as a practical matter, the subsidy scheme is indistinguishable from the Maryland scheme that the Court struck down in Hughes.

FERC has struggled with the question of to what extent wholesale power markets should accommodate state policy goals. Should the Court accept the ZEC cases, it could clarify the scope of FERC's authority to preempt state policy goals that interfere with the operation of wholesale markets.

Firm Highlights


COVID-19 Alert: State of Maine and City of Portland Issue Orders to Close Non-essential Businesses; Utility Services to Continue

On Tuesday March 24, 2020, both the City of Portland and the State of Maine issued comprehensive new limitations on business establishments in order to further limit the spread of the coronavirus. Both actions...


COVID-19 Alert: Massachusetts Closes “Non-essential” Businesses; Utility Services to Continue

The response to COVID-19 by states across the U.S. has continued to evolve rapidly. In Massachusetts, due to growing concerns over the spread of coronavirus, Governor Charlie Baker issued a “ shelter in place&rdquo...


7th Annual Maine Natural Gas Conference

On Thursday, October 3, 2019, Verrill and Pierce Atwood hosted our 7th Annual Maine Natural Gas Conference. Verrill attorney William Harwood and Pierce Atwood attorney John Gulliver led the day as our industry professionals...


Verrill’s Jim Cohen to Moderate Portland Chamber’s “Eggs & Issues” Discussion with Key State Officials regarding COVID-19

On Wednesday April 8, Verrill attorney and Portland Community Chamber of Commerce president James Cohen will moderate the Portland Chamber’s first-ever “virtual” Eggs & Issues on the subject of Maine’s response to the COVID-19...


Maine’s COVID-19 Response Impacts Utility Services and Other Business Activities

Like many states, Maine is quickly imposing a wide range of measures designed to protect the public in response to the spread of the coronavirus, COVID-19. Almost daily, Maine Governor Janet Mills and other...


2017 Emera Distribution Rate Case

Verrill represented Emera in its 2017 distribution rate case before the Maine PUC, which included: defeating Staff's proposed reduction to allowed return on equity for "management inefficiency;" approval of new expenditures, such as an...


Management Audit

Verrill represented Emera in its 2016 distribution rate case before the Maine PUC. The case involved issues relating to significant new capital investments, including Emera's new customer information system and a controversial substation investment...


Emera Maine Deal Offers Possible Rate Relief

Emera Maine, an electric utility, and Enmax are proposing millions in rate relief for its customers, that is if the deal is approved. Lawmakers, on the other hand, are proposing that regulators take time...


38 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in 2020 Chambers & Partners Guide

(April 27, 2020) – Verrill has been rated as a Leading Firm in a total of ten categories and subcategories as evaluated by London-based Chambers & Partners , one of the world's most respected...


Rate Design

We represented Emera in a rate design case before the Maine PUC to determine whether local distribution rates should be adjusted to reflect seasonal variations in the cost of providing electric distribution service.