Resources
News

Attorney Jim Goggin Represents Plaintiff in a Jurisdiction Against German Corporation

October 8, 2018 Media Mentions

On September 20, 2018, Massachusetts Lawyers Weeklymentioned attorney Jim Goggin in an article entitled, "Foreign Company's Sales Subject it to Jurisdiction." The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it did not offend the Due Process Clause of the Constitution to exercise jurisdiction against this German corporation that sold online to United States customers. The defendant failed to prevent sales to U.S. users on its website and, therefore, had been accepting payment from U.S. customers for over three years. Jim represented the plaintiff in the case and pointed to the significance the 1st Circuit placed on the defendant's failure to prevent U.S. customer access to its website. Jim states that the company should have heeded the admonition about using geo-blocking software or put disclaimers on its website to make clear where they do business.

The court concluded "that the German company could have 'reasonably anticipated' the exercise of specific personal jurisdiction based on its U.S. contacts."

With a subscription, access the Massachusetts Lawyers Weeklyarticle here.

Firm Highlights

News

Verrill Welcomes Intellectual Property Partner Patrick Duplessis, Enhancing the Firm’s Highly Sophisticated Patent Practice

Publication/Podcast

Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say…Gorelick v. Star Markets: A Study in Indemnity

Indemnity clauses in contracts are a valuable tool for allocating risk among the contracting parties, most often risk attendant to personal injury and property damage, and their effect can be far-reaching. Despite their significance...

News

Verrill Welcomes William Ryann to Firm’s Intellectual Property Group

News

Daniel J. Dwyer Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Article

News

82 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2024, Including 10 Named Lawyers of the Year

Matter

Elections and Constitutional Law: Successfully Challenged Certification of Initiative Petition

In a victory for consumers and the ride-hailing public, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently barred the Secretary of State from placing on the November ballot initiative petitions proposed by companies such as Uber...

Matter

Successful Representation of Insurer before U.S. District Court for the District of Maine

Verrill successfully represented an insurer before the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine in an insurance coverage matter alleging that the insurer improperly denied a defense and indemnification to a landlord under...

News

Verrill Welcomes Victoria M. Cascarelli to Firm’s Litigation & Trial Group

Publication/Podcast

State Trademark Registration

The United States has two levels of trademark registration: state and federal. A state trademark registration is issued by a state office and protects a trademark only in that state, whereas a federal trademark...

Publication/Podcast

Litigation Update: Jack Daniels V. Bad Spaniels. Is It Parody or Is It Trademark Infringement?

This week the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in the case, Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, U.S. Doc. No. 22-148, to decide the question: Can we do that? It’s been...

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700