A ‘Healthy’ Approach to Possible Commercial Lease Defaults in the Age of Coronavirus (COVID-19)

March 20, 2020 Alerts and Newsletters

As COVID-19 cases mount across the country, the inability to perform commercial lease obligations due to unforeseen circumstances has moved to the forefront. In contract-speak, unforeseen circumstances that lead to non-performance by a party are known as “force majeure” events. In these uncertain times, the constant refrain from world leaders – “we are all in this together”— serves as an important call for action, and undoubtedly, landlords and tenants will need to work cooperatively and creatively to navigate this new landscape. Nevertheless, commercial landlords and tenants who are facing a possible default in performance of their respective lease obligations due to current events should review their leases to determine the following:

  • Is there a force majeure clause in the lease agreement?
  • If so, is the force majeure clause applicable to this COVID-19 disruption, and does it excuse or postpone performance by either the landlord or the tenant?

Even if your commercial lease agreement contains a force majeure clause, it frequently would not be so comprehensive as to specifically list public health crises, diseases or pandemics as an excusable force majeure event. Moreover, force majeure clauses often expressly exclude the timely payment of rent from the tenant obligations that may be excused. The clause may contain a “governmental restriction” or similar trigger that clearly applies where a tenant has been required by law to close its business. Both parties should confirm the language of any applicable provisions, as landlords can expect many tenants that recently have been forced to close to request rent relief.

Aside from rent payment obligations, other issues to which a force majeure clause may be applicable and which the parties may be faced with include:

  • Whether the lease requires a tenant to be open and operating during certain hours.
  • Whether the lease requires a landlord to keep the building open during certain hours, or to perform certain services (like cleaning) that may be interrupted due to recent events.
  • Whether construction deadlines (for the landlord or the tenant) may be affected due to recent events.

Whether or not a commercial lease agreement contains a force majeure clause, the legal doctrines of impossibility and commercial impracticability, or frustration of purpose, may apply. These doctrines vary from state to state.

The first goal should be for commercial landlords and tenants to come to a mutual agreement regarding the problems they now are confronted with. Identifying the applicable lease provisions, and creative legal advocacy, may be the keys to presenting a persuasive case and arriving at an acceptable result.

The considerations raised above are not all encompassing, but should be examined carefully. We would be happy to assist in a review of the applicable provisions and a discussion of your options. Please feel free to contact our Real Estate Practice Group at any one of Verrill’s offices.

Firm Highlights


Verrill Welcomes Partner Andrew M. Walsh to Firm’s Business Law Group


State Trademark Registration

The United States has two levels of trademark registration: state and federal. A state trademark registration is issued by a state office and protects a trademark only in that state, whereas a federal trademark...


U.S. Tax Considerations When Buying Property Abroad with Ruth Mattson

Verrill partner Ruth Mattson was recently featured on The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel 's podcast series Trust and Estate Talk . In this podcast, U.S. Tax Considerations When Buying Property Abroad...


Advised Fortune 500 Company on Group Health and Welfare Benefit Plans

We were engaged by a Fortune 500 manufacturing company to provide legal and compliance services regarding its group health and welfare benefit plans. During the course of our representation, we have advised the company...


Jim Cohen Discusses “No Blank Checks” Citizen Initiative Before Maine Legislative Committee

Verrill Partner Jim Cohen was recently quoted in a Spectrum News article " Maine Ballot Initiative To Require Voter Approval For $1B Borrowing Gets Broad Support.” Maine LD 1772 is a citizen-initiated ballot question...


Elections and Constitutional Law: Successfully Challenged Certification of Initiative Petition

In a victory for consumers and the ride-hailing public, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently barred the Secretary of State from placing on the November ballot initiative petitions proposed by companies such as Uber...



Remember that old parody of the Battle Hymn of the Republic we used to sing before there was an Internet? There are apparently many versions, but they all generally involve children inflicting various types...


Virtual Lunch & Learn: Human Resources in Small Business/Startups

Verrill associate Emily Waddell will be presenting at PROPEL 's Virtual Lunch & Learn: Human Resources in Small Business/Startups. In addition to presenters sharing their expertise, this session covers various Human Resource topics including...


Tesla’s Cybertruck Raffle

On May 11, 2023, @BabyTesla3 sent out a Tweet: NEW: Tesla has revamped the Referral program and introduced a new loyalty program! Here’s what you need to know • S/X: 3,500 credits (referrer) &bull...


New Options for Retirement Plan Distributions Under SECURE 2.0

This post summarizes the new distribution options, including penalty-free withdrawals, applicable to defined contribution plans under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (“SECURE 2.0”) and provides a timeline of their effective dates. The new...

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700