A Wrinkle in Common Rule Time

January 18, 2018 Alerts and Newsletters

January 18, 2018 - In an 11th hour—but nonetheless anticipated—move, the sixteen federal departments and agencies responsible for the Common Rule Final Rule that was slated to become effective tomorrow, January 19, 2018 ("Revised Common Rule"), have issued an Interim Final Rule ("IFR ") delaying the effective date and the general compliance date of the Revised Common Rule for six months, until July 19, 2018. The IFR does not alter the compliance date for the Revised Common Rule's provision on cooperative research (including its single IRB mandate); that date remains January 20, 2020.

The announcement provides a respite to those in the regulated community who have been working towards bringing their policies and procedures into compliance by January 19, 2018, despite the lack of any written guidance from the Office for Human Research Protections or others in the federal government regarding aspects of the Revised Common Rule that are ambiguous or otherwise challenging to implement.

The IFR acknowledges that "regulated entities need additional time for implementation and compliance, which would be furthered by the issuance of guidance by the Common Rule agencies" as part of its justification for issuing the delay through the IFR process without the normally required period for public notice-and-comment.

Serving as a "pause" button in what has been a perplexing process for many in the regulated community, the IFR contemplates that the federal departments and agencies will use the delay period to pursue additional rulemaking to extend further the effective date and compliance date for the Revised Common Rule to January 21, 2019.

One puzzling aspect of the IFR is its stated "effective date." Although the government is indicating that the delay outlined in the IFR serves to stay tomorrow's compliance and effective dates for the Revised Common Rule, the IFR states that the IFR itself has an effective date of July 19, 2018, which is the same day the Revised Common Rule would also become effective pursuant to the IFR. Our understanding is that the identification of this date may be driven by the fact that the delay is being issued prior to the Revised Common Rule going into effect, and because the IFR seeks to modify specific language in the "transition" provisions of the as-yet-effective Revised Common Rule at §___101(l) (which explicitly sets forth the effective and compliance dates). However, the express statements in the IFR that it does not take effect until the Revised Common Rule would already have been in effect for six months under the original Final Rule has caused some confusion in the regulated community and among regulatory attorneys. Again, all indications from the government are that the delay is effective immediately notwithstanding the IFR's stated effective date, and that this confusion is simply the result of a regulatory technicality.

Importantly, the regulated community should note that early compliance with the flexible aspects of the Revised Common Rule remains prohibited ahead of July 19. Institutions may elect to implement aspects of the Revised Common Rule that are more stringent than the current regulations (for example, the new elements of informed consent related to secondary uses), but may not take advantage of flexibilities, such as broad consent and the new categories of exempt research, at this time.

We have updated our 2018 Common Rule Implementation Checklist in light of the new effective date and compliance date, and have added some additional reflection on particular regulatory provisions since the checklist was originally circulated. We include this updated Implementation Checklist here for your reference. For more information about the delay or the ACRG's Implementation Checklist, or to discuss your institution's plans for compliance with the 2018 Common Rule, please feel free to contact the member of Verrill Dana's Academic and Clinical Research Group with whom you normally work, or email us at [email protected].

This communication is intended for general information purposes and as a service to clients and friends of Verrill Dana, LLP. This publication, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances, nor does it create attorney-client privilege.

Firm Highlights


Recovery From Surety and Professional Liability Carrier for Defective Turbine and Biomass Energy Facility Components

Our client developed a biomass fired cogeneration power facility to sell power back to the grid and to support its sawmill operations. As part of this project, it entered into a $13+ million contract...


Verrill attorney Elizabeth Connellan Smith Elected to the Board of Governors of The College of Workers’ Compensation Lawyers


Supreme Leak: NLRA Rights

For blog followers, you likely saw last week’s post reminding you to revisit your confidentiality policies in the wake of the leaking of the Supreme Court’s draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health...


New Rules for Apprentices on Energy Projects Come with Uncertainty for Contractors and Developers

On January 1, 2021, a new law went into effect setting benchmarks for use of apprentices on energy generation facility construction projects. Enacted in 2019, the law was part of “An Act to Establish...


Massachusetts Employers Beware: Any Late Wage Payment Means Liability for Triple Damages



We have assisted many owners, and contractors in design and construction contracting including: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Investment Management Company on over a billion dollars in projects in Kendall Square area of Cambridge, Massachusetts...


Supreme Leak: Religion at Work

Over the last year, our society has navigated COVID-19 and rules concerning vaccination and masking. As a society and on this blog, we have discussed regularly the role religious freedoms play in the work...


Connecticut’s new privacy law: What you need to know

As part of its growing privacy practice, Verrill is pleased to share this advisory on Connecticut’s new privacy law. Verrill is pleased to offer a sophisticated range of privacy and cybersecurity services. On May...


Groundbreaking Decision Released by Connecticut Supreme Court

In a groundbreaking decision released on May 10, 2022 arising out of an appeal argued by Verrill attorney Andrew Nevas on November 16, 2021 in front of the Connecticut Supreme Court , the Supreme...


Department of Labor Guidance and Federal Initiatives Counsel a Wait-and-See Approach for 401(k) Plan Fiduciaries Interested in Cryptocurrency Options

On March 10, 2022, the Department of Labor published Compliance Assistance Release 2022-01, 401(k) Plan Investments in “Cryptocurrencies” . The Release strongly discourages the addition of cryptocurrency (and other digital asset) options to the...

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700