Maine PUC Clarifies Ability of Level 2 Projects to “Leapfrog” Level 4 Projects in Interconnection Queue

November 2, 2022 Alerts and Newsletters

After months of uncertainty over the issue of whether Level 2 renewable energy projects can “leapfrog” Level 4 projects in the queue, the Maine PUC clarified one of the ambiguities.

Specifically, in response to a petition we filed over the summer on behalf of a renewable energy developer, the Maine PUC issued an order at the end of October clarifying that developers may pay 100% of their known interconnection costs prior to completion of cluster studies that determine their transmission costs and be considered “aggregated generation” under Chapter 324. This is an important development that should reduce the frequency of Level 2 projects “leapfrogging” previously queued Level 4 projects that are stuck in cluster studies.

This issue arose in part due to a waiver granted by the PUC to CMP in September 2020 regarding Sections 12(S) and 12(T) of Chapter 324 of the Commission’s rules. This waiver allowed CMP to delay issuing construction schedules to customers in the interconnection queue until after the completion of the ISO-NE I.3.9 process. Pursuant to this waiver, T&D utilities adopted a policy of not invoicing Level 4 projects for payments of the estimated costs of interconnection upgrades until after the I.3.9 determination and cost allocations from ISO-NE cluster studies were complete.

This waiver had little adverse impact on a Level 4 Project until January 2022 when the MPUC amended Chapter 324 and adopted a definition of Aggregated Generation that excluded projects that had not paid 100% of estimated interconnection costs. Specifically, only the following are considered Aggregated Generation under the new definition: the project proposed by the applicant, in-service projects, and “all ICGFs that have paid the T&D Utility for 100% of interconnection-related costs attributable to it, including costs for studies, distribution facilities, systems upgrades, metering, and other items [for] which the ICGF has cost responsibility.” Previously, the utilities had treated all queued generation as aggregated generation. As a result of this new definition, Level 4 projects that have not paid 100% of their interconnection costs were no longer considered aggregated generation.

The combination of the definition of Aggregated Generation and the waiver that permitted delayed invoicing caused havoc in the queue. Level 2 projects were able to leapfrog Level 4 projects because the Level 4 projects were not considered when the utility applied the screening criteria to determine whether there was adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the proposed Level 2 project. When Level 4 projects asked to be invoiced so that they would be treated as aggregated generation, the T&D utilities pointed to the waiver and indicated that the invoices could not be issued until the cluster studies were completed and I.3.9 approval obtained. Each time a Level 2 project leapfroggs the queue, it forces a sequential restudy of all Level 4 projects in the queue. This results in significant delays to accommodate the required restudies, potential increases in interconnection costs resulting from such restudies, and undermines the commercial viability of projects that may otherwise have been shovel ready.

Verrill has filed several petitions seeking relief from the adverse consequences of the new definition of Aggregated Generation and the impact of Level 2 projects leapfrogging previously queued Level 4 projects. The MPUC issued the attached Order that provides partial relief and that allows projects to pay 100% of known interconnection costs prior completion of cluster studies and I.3.9 approval. The Commission points out that by allowing projects to pay 100% of their known interconnection costs, the utility will be able to consider the generation from these projects when screening future Level 2 projects. Although it does not solve the problem entirely, it provides partial relief from the draconian impact of the definition of Aggregated Generation.

For further information please contact Juliet Browne or Jonathan M. Dunitz.

Firm Highlights


Crisis emerges in Maine over safe disposal of biosolids from wastewater treatment plants

Maine wastewater treatment plants are currently facing intense challenges concerning disposal of their sewage sludge , also called “biosolids.” This is a fast-moving issue getting significant coverage in the media and substantial attention from...


Verrill's Jim Cohen To Speak on Past and Future of Maine’s Electric Grid at 2023 Winter Bar Conference

Verrill partner Jim Cohen will be presenting at the Maine State Bar Association’s Winter Bar Conference 2023, on Friday, January 27, in Portland. Cohen’s presentation, The Past and Future of Maine’s Electric Grid...


Maine PUC to Kick Off Review of Grid Plan to Assist Clean Energy Transition

Last month, the Maine Public Utilities Commission initiated a proceeding to identify the priorities to be addressed in an electric grid plan that will assist Maine in the “cost-effective transition to a clean, affordable...


PFAS Regulatory Update: Dates You Need to Know

Public Comment on the Federal Proposed Drinking Water Standards for Six PFAS Compounds On March 29, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), published in the Federal Register its proposed national drinking water standards...


Georgetown Broadband LLC Secures Utility Pole Attachment Authorization for Community Broadband Project

On February 17, 2023, Georgetown Broadband LLC (GBLLC) became the latest community broadband entity to receive pole attachment authorization from the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to deploy a fiber broadband network. GBLLC began...


Maine PUC Asked to Fix “Leapfrogging” Problem Triggered by 2022 Changes to Maine’s Generator Interconnection Rule

The Maine Public Utilities Commission is currently considering whether to commence a formal emergency rulemaking process to amend Chapter 324 of its rules governing generator interconnections. The purpose of the rulemaking would be to...


Four Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Chambers & Partners for Energy and Environmental Law in Maine

Verrill attorneys Juliet T. Browne, James I. Cohen, Gordon R. Smith, and Mathew J. Todaro were recently recognized for energy and environmental law in Maine in the 2022 Chambers & Partners Guide . Chambers...


Verrill Partner Mat Todaro selected to serve on the American Bar Association’s Section on Environment, Energy, and Resources 2022 Fall Conference Planning Committee

Earlier this year, Verrill Partner Mat Todaro was selected by American Bar Association leadership to serve on the 2022 Fall Conference Planning Committee for its Section on Environment, Energy, and Resources. In this role...


U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Proposes National Drinking Water Standard for Six PFAS Compounds

On March 14, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) announced a proposed National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) for six per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”). PFAS are a category of manufactured chemicals that...


Carolyn Gilbert Nominated to Maine PUC

On March 28, Governor Janet Mills nominated Carolyn “Carrie” Gilbert to serve a six-year term on the Maine Public Utilities Commission. For the past 15 years, Gilbert has worked at Daymark Energy Advisors where...

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700