Net-Metering News from Maine and California

January 2, 2019 Alerts and Newsletters

On December 17, 2018, the Maine PUC exempted medium and large non-residential customer classes of CMP and Emera from compliance with the Commission's net energy billing provisions in Chapter 313, section 3(f), which require measurement of a customer's production of "nettable energy." The Commission enacted, effective for facilities in service as of January 2018, Chapter 313 (1) in light of the declining costs of constructing small renewable generation facilities and (2) in order to reduce the inequity of shifting transmission and distribution (T&D) costs to ratepayers not participating in net energy billing. Order Adopting Rule and Statement of Factual and Policy Basis, Docket No. 2016-00222 at 10 (Mar. 1, 2017). Chapter 313 gradually ratchets down, by 10% each year beginning in January 2018 and down to 0% in 2026, a generators' potential "nettable energy"—the generation credits that renewable generators can net against their T&D kWh charges. Central Maine Power Request for Approval of T&C Section 57 – Net Energy Billing, Docket No. 2018-00037 (Me. P.U.C. Dec. 17, 2018) (Order Granting Exemption).

The Commission deemed that an exemption of large and medium non-residential classes was justified largely due to the way those customers pay for T&D service—primarily through demand charges—in contrast with small residential customers' bills that seek recovery of T&D costs through KWh charges. Id. at 1 n.1, 3. The Commission found only a negligible impact on the cost shift to non-net energy ratepayers in the two affected customer classes, one insufficient to justify the costs of additional metering (typically through installation of a second meter). Id. at 3. The Commission will require Emera and CMP to include in their future biannual NEB reports (1) the costs associated with installing second meters, (2) the administrative costs associated with billing, and (3) the estimated costs incurred that form the basis for any billing system changes. Id. at 4.

Across the great divide and also in net-metering news, energy financing companies in California are positioning to adapt to new residential building code mandates in 2020. This past spring, California lawmakers introduced building code revisions that would mandate solar energy deployments on all residential properties under three stories and newly constructed in 2020. The notice of proposed action lauded the new building standards as creating an avoided-cost value over thirty-years that is "greater than any increased construction costs that will result from the Standards." California Energy Commission,2019 Standards Notice of Proposed Action, Docket No. 17-BSTD-02 (Jan. 18, 2018) (citing an average of $10,538 in construction costs and $16,251 in net present avoided energy costs).

Now, solar financing providers in tandem with multi-family construction and behind the meter technology companies are looking to profit from the standards using solar car ports' tax credits and accelerated depreciation benefits to offset construction costs. SDC Energy, Don't Dread New Title 24 Solar Mandates; Profit from Them, (Dec. 11, 2018). Building owners will gain from the sale of solar energy while tenants see 10% to 15% on their utility bills. Key to this equation is California's recent approval of "virtual net metering," a system in which individual tenants and owners of multifamily properties can benefit from both using and selling back to the local utility solar energy generated on site. The program relies on an energy monitoring database that collects individual tenants' solar energy usage, which is then used to generate a solar usage charge that is added to the rent bill for each tenant.

The landscape of Maine's community and non-residential small scale generation look markedly different from that in California, and those differing contexts suggest divergent cost-benefit implications for residential and non-residential small-scale renewables.

Please direct any questions to Verrill Dana's Energy Law Group.

Firm Highlights

Blog

Federal and State Funds to Support Maine Climate Action Plan’s Transportation and Broadband Goals

Last week, the Maine Governor’s Energy Office (GEO) and Office of Policy Innovation and the Future jointly presented to the Legislature’s Energy, Utilities, and Technology (EUT) Committee a report outlining a four-year funding plan...

Matter

Verrill Helps Hancock Solar Project Obtain MDEP Permit, Protect Upland Sandpipers

The 14-megawatt Hancock Solar project in the town of Hancock, Maine has obtained its Site Law permit from the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. Verrill assisted the project with environmental permitting, which included the...

News

Verrill Welcomes Attorney Nate Menard to Firm's Environmental and Energy Group

(March 4, 2021) – Verrill is pleased to welcome Nate Menard who will join as an associate attorney in the firm’s environmental and energy law practice. Prior to joining Verrill, Menard served on active...

Blog

Prop 65: Will the “Short-Form” be Short Lived?

Enacted as part of the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Proposition 65 (“Prop 65”) requires businesses with ten or more employees that sell products in the state of California to...

News

Verrill Partner to Lead Firm’s Energy, Telecommunications, and Natural Resources Group

(May 14, 2021) – Verrill is pleased to announce that Jim Cohen has been appointed chair of the firm’s Energy, Telecommunications, and Natural Resources Group. Cohen, a former Mayor of Portland, is a long-time...

Matter

Rate Design

We represented Emera in a rate design case before the Maine PUC to determine whether local distribution rates should be adjusted to reflect seasonal variations in the cost of providing electric distribution service.

Matter

2017 Emera Distribution Rate Case

Verrill represented Emera in its 2017 distribution rate case before the Maine PUC, which included: defeating Staff's proposed reduction to allowed return on equity for "management inefficiency;" approval of new expenditures, such as an...

Blog

Patrick Scully Nominated to Maine PUC

On May 24, Governor Janet Mills nominated attorney Patrick Scully , who was most recently the Chief Executive Officer of Bernstein Shur, to serve a six-year term on the Maine Public Utilities Commission. For...

Matter

Management Audit

Verrill represented Emera in its 2016 distribution rate case before the Maine PUC. The case involved issues relating to significant new capital investments, including Emera's new customer information system and a controversial substation investment...

Blog

Verrill Attorney Gordon Smith Comments on Lawsuit Claiming Ownership of Maine Coastal Property

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700