Remote Sellers in Maine Beware: You May Be Subject to Collect Sales and Use Tax

October 2, 2017 Alerts and Newsletters

Maine has just joined several other states in their quest to try and collect sales and use tax on remote sellers. Effective October 1, 2017, Maine requires remote sellers (sellers with no apparent physical presence in the state; i.e., no employees, office, warehouse, etc.) to collect and remit Maine sales and use tax on sales into the state if either: (1) the seller's gross revenue from the sales in the previous calendar year or current calendar year exceeds $100,000, or (2) the seller made at least 200 separate transactions in the previous calendar year or the current calendar year. As discussed below, this new legislation raises potential constitutional challenges by imposing a sales and use tax on remote sellers who have no physical connection with Maine but simply sell in volume to Maine customers.

The U.S. Supreme Court in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), established precedent that a state is prohibited from imposing a sales tax collection obligation on a seller that has no physical presence within the state. South Dakota sought to challenge Quill when in 2016 it enacted legislation imposing a sales tax requirement on a remote retailer that either exceeded a threshold amount of revenue from sales into South Dakota or entered into a minimum number of sales transactions within the state (a similar statute to Maine). South Dakota's legislation was recently challenged and ruled unconstitutional by the South Dakota Supreme Court in State of South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc., Inc. & Newegg, Inc., 2017 S.D. 56 (2017). The South Dakota Supreme Court based its decision on the fact that Quill has not yet been overruled. This decision in South Dakota, however, leaves the door open for the state to seek an opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Quill.

The U.S. Supreme Court may be interested in hearing such a case. In 2015, Supreme Court Justice Kennedy stated that changes in technology and consumer sophistication warrant a reversal of Quill, since a "business may be present in a State in a meaningful way, without that presence being physical in the traditional sense of the term." Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl, 135 S. Ct. 1124, 1135 (2015). Nevertheless, until a U.S. Supreme Court decision is made to overturn Quill, states similar to Maine, will likely continue to challenge and push legislation that requires remote sellers to collect and remit sales tax when it sells within its borders.

Maine is mindful of potential challenges to its legislation. In its statute, Maine is authorized to bring a declaratory judgment action against any remote seller meeting the requirements for the sales and use tax obligation discussed above. The statute further provides that if an action is brought, or if there is another suit contesting the statute, then Maine will be enjoined from enforcing the sales and use tax against any person who does not affirmatively consent or otherwise collect the sales or use tax voluntarily.

If you have any questions regarding the implications of Maine's new legislation, please contact either Cheryl Johnson at [email protected] or Jen Green at [email protected].

This communication is intended for general information purposes and as a service to clients and friends of Verrill Dana, LLP. This publication, which may be considered advertising under the ethical rules of certain jurisdictions, should not be construed as legal advice or a legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances, nor does it create attorney-client privilege.

Firm Highlights


Allagash becomes Maine’s First Benefit Corporation

Allagash Benefit Event

PPP Math for the Self-Employed: And, Yes, There is Still Time

The Small Business Administration reports that as of May 23 it still had nearly $150 billion of untapped Paycheck Protection Program funds. The Program has been underutilized by self-employed business owners, in part due...


Bill is Passed for Eased Restrictions on PPP Loan

On June 3, the Senate passed the Paycheck Protection Flexibility Act, easing the restrictions on how businesses spend their Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, which may allow small business owners more room for qualifying...


Nearly 80 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2021, Including a Dozen Named Lawyers of the Year

(August 24, 2020) – Nearly 80 Verrill attorneys were recognized as "Best Lawyers" by Best Lawyers® 2021 , including 12 attorneys named “Lawyer of the Year,” a distinguished recognition for only a single lawyer...


Banking: Helping Non-Depository Trust Companies Do Business in Other States

Verrill has helped to form more non-depository trust companies in Maine than any other law firm. We have also helped our trust clients when they look to expand their business into other states. In...


PPP Forgiveness Planning Scenarios

How to use this article: You already know that the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) is highly complex, with intertwining conditions, exceptions, and definitions that defy simple explanation. This article assumes that you are pretty...


60% Is Not a Cliff, Indeed

On June 11, the Small Business Administration (SBA) and the Treasury Department published important guidance that the revised 60% condition under the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act will be applied proportionately, and not as...


Banking: Establishment of Non-Depository Trust for National Company

Verrill served as special counsel to a national firm in the chartering and licensing of a Maine non-depository trust company as the client’s wholly-owned subsidiary. Non-depository trust companies are highly regulated, and the matter...


Paycheck Protection Program Focuses on Short-Term and Misses Long-Term Damages

On June 8, the Portland Press Herald published an article, "Revamped emergency loan program remains a short-term fix," discussing the Paycheck Protection Program's (PPP) extended deadlines and loosened restrictions, but lack of solutions to...


The New PPP Math: 24 + 60 = > Forgiveness + > Paperwork

On June 5, the President signed into law the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act. This is the second amendment to the Program, the first being on April 24, to increase funding levels to $659...