Trademark Registrants Beware: Important U.S. Trademark Developments Can Result in Cancelled Registrations

January 25, 2022 Alerts and Newsletters

(January 25, 2022) - As of December 27, 2021, new “expungement” and “reexamination” proceedings are available for third parties to request the cancellation of an active U.S. trademark registration that is not being used in connection with some or all of the goods/services set forth in the registration. The purpose of the two new proceedings is to eliminate overly broad and deadwood registrations. Their impact, however, will be felt by all applicants and registrants.

An important development in U.S. trademark practice, these proceedings can be a straightforward, cost-effective means of clearing conflicting registrations without having to resort to more onerous and expensive cancellation proceedings. They also allow registrations to be more easily cancelled in whole or in part, a prospect that is a double-edged sword.

Expungement vs. Reexamination

  • Expungement proceedings
    • Available against all registrations, i.e., those based on use and those based on foreign registrations
    • Considers whether a registered mark has ever been used in commerce on or in connection with some or all of the registered goods/services
    • Available between the third and tenth years of registration, however, expungement is available against any registration that is at least three years old, regardless of the 10-year limit, until December 27, 2023
  • Reexamination proceedings
    • Available only against registrations that are based on use in commerce
    • Considers whether the mark was in use in commerce on or in connection with some or all of the goods/services as of the date the application was filed (if based on use), or the later of the date an amendment to allege use was filed or the date that the deadline to file a statement of use expired (if based on intent to use)
    • Available during the first five years following the date of registration

What you can do now

There are several steps you can take right now to protect your interests and registrations in light of these new proceedings.

  • Be cautious of filing overly broad applications and discuss potential risks related to these new proceedings with your attorney
  • Maintain records and documentation of use of your trademarks, from the date of first use to present day, so this information is easily accessible if an expungement or reexamination proceeding is filed (these records will also prove useful for any disputes regarding the use of your mark should any arise)
  • Consider auditing your U.S. registrations for extraneous goods/services that are clearly unrelated to your goods/services, and that may make your registrations vulnerable to expungement or reexamination

The rollout of these expungement and reexamination proceedings will most likely not be smooth. We will keep you apprised of any new developments in relevant USPTO practice as things unfold. Please contact Becky Lessard or another member of Verrill’s Intellectual Property & Technology Group with any questions regarding these changes.

Firm Highlights

Matter

Trademark Litigation: Hospitality

Represented trademark owner in litigation with direct competitor. Successfully defeated summary judgment motion by defendant. Case tried to a jury who returned a verdict in favor of trademark owner, which ultimately resulted in defendant...

Publication/Podcast

Federal Trademark Registration

Matter

Patent Litigation: LED Lighting

Defended national lighting manufacturer against non-practicing entity on patents relating to TLED design. Developed early non-infringement positions which resulted in early (and favorable) settlement.

Matter

Patent Litigation: LED Lighting

Defended national lighting manufacturer against competitor with patents relating to LED lighting and driver design. Briefed Markman . Also filed successful IPR petitions against asserted patents (each petition instituted on all challenged claims). Case...

News

77 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2023, Including Six Named Lawyers of the Year

Matter

Patent Litigation: LED Lighting

Represented national lighting manufacturer in Section 337 investigation before the International Trade Commission. Developed early invalidity position, which resulted in early (and favorable) settlement prior to summary determination.

Publication/Podcast

Federal Trademark Registration - Part 2

Matter

Trademark Litigation: Multimedia

Defended multi-platform media company in trademark infringement and unfair competition matter in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts; integral member of trial team; obtained complete defense verdict after bench trial.

Matter

Trademark Litigation: Software

Represented trademark owner in litigation with foreign software company. Successfully defeated motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds, which was affirmed on appeal. Also successfully defeated summary judgment motion, which resulted in case settling before...

Matter

Trademark Litigation: Consumer Goods

Represented three defendants against trademark owner in long-running dispute. Successfully briefed early motion to dismiss on all non-trademark claims against the defendants. First-chaired trial of trademark claims leading to a successful decision invaliding all...

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700