U.S. Supreme Court Asked to Review Zero Emissions Credit Schemes

February 22, 2019 Alerts and Newsletters

In two related cases, Petitioners are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down state generator subsidies that Petitioners argue distort competitive wholesale power markets that are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the Federal Power Act (FPA). Both cases concern "zero emission credits" (ZEC) schemes, one in Illinois and one in New York, that subsidize nuclear power plants. These ZEC subsidies allow otherwise uncompetitive nuclear plants to stay profitable and continue to operate, even if they fail to receive sufficient compensation in wholesale power auctions. Both the Second and Seventh Circuits have upheld the ZEC nuclear power subsidies.

Should the Supreme Court accept the cases, it would be a follow up to the Court's 2016 decision in Hughes v. Talen, in which the Court ruled that a Maryland generator subsidy program was preempted by the FPA. Under Maryland's program, generators would receive a set price for energy, regardless of the outcome of the wholesale auction, but they were nevertheless required to bid into the wholesale auction and be accepted as a winning resource. Because of the specific nature of that program, the subsidized generators' only incentive was to bid as low as possible in order to clear the auction. Thus, the program had the clear effect of distorting the wholesale power market, as generators were not bidding into the market based on their true costs to deliver power.

The Court's holding in Hughes is narrow: it only prohibits states from implementing a subsidy program that ties compensation to participation in the wholesale market. The ZEC schemes in New York and Illinois were drafted to avoid the Hughes problem but accomplish the same goal. Petitioners are asking the Court to expand the Hughes holding to include programs that have the necessary effect of distorting wholesale markets, albeit in a way that is not directly tethered to participation in the wholesale market.

According to Petitioners, the ZEC schemes have exactly the same effect as the Maryland program. The nuclear plants will receive a guaranteed rate, regardless of the FERC-approved auction rates. Petitioners further argue that, although not explicitly required to participate in wholesale markets, due to the nature of nuclear power, nuclear plants must run continuously and will inevitably sell all of their output in wholesale markets. Thus, as a practical matter, the subsidy scheme is indistinguishable from the Maryland scheme that the Court struck down in Hughes.

FERC has struggled with the question of to what extent wholesale power markets should accommodate state policy goals. Should the Court accept the ZEC cases, it could clarify the scope of FERC's authority to preempt state policy goals that interfere with the operation of wholesale markets.

Firm Highlights

Matter

Prudence of New Substation

Verrill represented a Maine utility in a lengthy and contentious Maine PUC case involving the prudence of the siting and design of a new substation. To address the concerns of several neighbors arising out...

Matter

FERC Headwater Benefits Case

Secured a settlement on behalf of several downstream hydro owners in a FERC headwater benefits case that spanned 12 years and involved millions of dollars of claims between several major U.S. hydro developers owning...

News

Emera Maine Deal Offers Possible Rate Relief

Emera Maine, an electric utility, and Enmax are proposing millions in rate relief for its customers, that is if the deal is approved. Lawmakers, on the other hand, are proposing that regulators take time...

Blog

Maine Energy Storage Commission Issues Report to Legislature

The Commission to Study the Economic, Environmental and Energy Benefits of Energy Storage to the Maine Electricity Industry has issued its report to the Legislature. The Commission unanimously agreed on the benefits of energy...

Blog

Maine Solar Boom: Over 1.5GW of Distributed Solar Capacity in the Queue

Blog

First Circuit Acts on Appeal by South Portland Pipeline Company

On January 10, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit acted on the Portland Pipe Line Corporation’s (PPLC) appeal of the district court order upholding a South Portland zoning ordinance that...

Event

Cleantech Open Mixer 2020

Since 2005, Cleantech Open has trained over 1200 early-stage clean technology startup entrepreneurs through its annual business accelerator. A majority of CTO alumni have survived the merciless technology startup "valley of death" and gone...

Matter

Power Purchase Agreements

Represented a New York wind developer in proceedings in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island to obtain regulatory approval of power purchase agreements with utilities in those three states pursuant to their tristate clean energy...

Publication/Podcast

7th Annual Maine Natural Gas Conference

On Thursday, October 3, 2019, Verrill and Pierce Atwood hosted our 7th Annual Maine Natural Gas Conference. Verrill attorney William Harwood and Pierce Atwood attorney John Gulliver led the day as our industry professionals...

Publication/Podcast

MPUC Approves Term Sheet for Three Rivers Solar Power, LLC’s 100 MW Solar Project

Today, the Maine Public Utilities Commission approved a term sheet for a long-term contact for Three Rivers Solar Power, LLC's 100 MW solar project. The Three Rivers Solar project will be located in Hancock...