Elections and Constitutional Law: Constitutionality of Ranked Choice Voting
Verrill Dana represented the League of Women Voters in two proceedings before the Maine Supreme Court relating to the constitutionality of Maine’s voter-approved ranked choice voting law. The first proceeding, Opinion of the Justices, 2017 ME 100, was a rare “solemn occasion” in which the Supreme Court is asked to render an opinion where a proceeding has not been commenced but the issue is of special significance. In Opinion of the Justices, the Supreme Court held that ranked choice voting was unconstitutional under Maine’s constitution, but permitted ranked choice voting in primaries and federal elections to proceed. In Maine Senate v. Secretary of State, 2018 ME 52, the Supreme Court held that it could not decide the authority of the Secretary of State to implement ranked choice voting under a separation of powers theory.
Appeal of Patent Dispute
Represented a large medical device manufacturer in an appeal of a $250 million jury verdict in patent on grounds concerning ensnarement, lost profits, and the trial court's misunderstanding of the "reverse doctrine of equivalents."
Computer Based Banking Patent Dispute
We represented the U.S. division of a large international bank, in both federal District Court and on appeal to the Federal Circuit, in a patent dispute concerning computer-based banking transactions. We prevailed on key claim constructions, won summary judgment, and preserved the victory on appeal.
Medical Device Patent Dispute
We represented a large medical device manufacturer in a six-patent dispute involving nearly a dozen accused devices for thoraco-lumbar spinal fixation. We prevailed on every single Markman claim construction and then won at trial.