Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        COVID-19 Vaccination Incentive Programs: Additional Guidance and Some Comfort

        by Christopher S. Lockman on May 28, 2021

        Earlier today the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) released guidance confirming that employers may offer incentives to employees who voluntarily obtain a COVID-19 vaccination. The guidance (available here) appears as an update to earlier technical guidance issued by the EEOC and also offers new information regarding an employer’s ability to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations and provide necessary accommodations.

        As vaccines have become more widely available, employers have looked for ways to incentivize their employees to get vaccinated. Many employers were concerned, however, that a program offering incentives (such as paid time off or additional compensation) in exchange for proof of vaccination may result in the inadvertent creation of a wellness program subject to the rules under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and/or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), particularly if the incentive program was linked to an onsite vaccination clinic.

        Today’s guidance clarifies the legal requirements that apply to the design of a vaccine incentive program. The guidance confirms that employers may offer incentives to employees to voluntarily provide proof of vaccination because requesting vaccine status is not a “disability-related inquiry.” In addition, employers may offer only limited incentives to employees who voluntarily receive a vaccination administered by an employer or an agent hired by the employer because the prescreening questions essential to vaccine delivery are disability-related inquiries that will subject the incentive program to the ADA wellness program rules. Incentives under this type of program can take the form of either a reward or penalty but must not be “so substantial as to be coercive.”

        The guidance also addresses the implications of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) on vaccination incentive programs. It clarifies that GINA permits an employer to offer incentives to employees who voluntarily provide confirmation that they or their family members were vaccinated by a third party (not the employer or its agent). Employers may also offer incentives to employees vaccinated by the employer or its agent without running afoul of GINA. The guidance points out, however, that an employer may not provide incentives for an employee’s family members to be vaccinated by the employer or its agent, because GINA prohibits an employer (and its agent) from asking the employee’s family members pre-vaccination medical screening questions, the responses to which constitute genetic information about the employee.

        The guidance does not address all outstanding questions. Perhaps most importantly it does not discuss what the EEOC views as an incentive level that would be “coercive,” and it does not attempt to address whether HIPAA wellness program rules might apply to a particular program. It does, however, provide a solid foundation on which employers can build (or shore up) the design of their vaccination incentive programs.

        Please contact a member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have questions about implementing a COVID-19 vaccination incentive program.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...