Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        COVID-19 Vaccination Incentive Programs: Additional Guidance and Some Comfort

        by Christopher S. Lockman on May 28, 2021

        Earlier today the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) released guidance confirming that employers may offer incentives to employees who voluntarily obtain a COVID-19 vaccination. The guidance (available here) appears as an update to earlier technical guidance issued by the EEOC and also offers new information regarding an employer’s ability to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations and provide necessary accommodations.

        As vaccines have become more widely available, employers have looked for ways to incentivize their employees to get vaccinated. Many employers were concerned, however, that a program offering incentives (such as paid time off or additional compensation) in exchange for proof of vaccination may result in the inadvertent creation of a wellness program subject to the rules under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and/or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), particularly if the incentive program was linked to an onsite vaccination clinic.

        Today’s guidance clarifies the legal requirements that apply to the design of a vaccine incentive program. The guidance confirms that employers may offer incentives to employees to voluntarily provide proof of vaccination because requesting vaccine status is not a “disability-related inquiry.” In addition, employers may offer only limited incentives to employees who voluntarily receive a vaccination administered by an employer or an agent hired by the employer because the prescreening questions essential to vaccine delivery are disability-related inquiries that will subject the incentive program to the ADA wellness program rules. Incentives under this type of program can take the form of either a reward or penalty but must not be “so substantial as to be coercive.”

        The guidance also addresses the implications of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA) on vaccination incentive programs. It clarifies that GINA permits an employer to offer incentives to employees who voluntarily provide confirmation that they or their family members were vaccinated by a third party (not the employer or its agent). Employers may also offer incentives to employees vaccinated by the employer or its agent without running afoul of GINA. The guidance points out, however, that an employer may not provide incentives for an employee’s family members to be vaccinated by the employer or its agent, because GINA prohibits an employer (and its agent) from asking the employee’s family members pre-vaccination medical screening questions, the responses to which constitute genetic information about the employee.

        The guidance does not address all outstanding questions. Perhaps most importantly it does not discuss what the EEOC views as an incentive level that would be “coercive,” and it does not attempt to address whether HIPAA wellness program rules might apply to a particular program. It does, however, provide a solid foundation on which employers can build (or shore up) the design of their vaccination incentive programs.

        Please contact a member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have questions about implementing a COVID-19 vaccination incentive program.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...