Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Proposed Regulations on How to Use Forfeiture Accounts: Helpful Guidance and a Great Reminder to Plan Sponsors

        by Kenneth F. Ginder on March 7, 2023

        On February 27, 2023, the IRS published proposed regulations on the use of forfeitures in qualified retirement plans.[1] For defined contribution plans, the regulations provide welcome clarity on what forfeitures can be used for and the date by which forfeitures must be used. In addition, they provide a helpful transition rule and, most importantly, serve as a reminder that forfeiture accounts must be used promptly to avoid an operational failure that will place the plan’s tax-qualified status at risk.

        In the Spring of 2010, the IRS warned plan sponsors in its “Retirement News for Employers” about the improper use of forfeiture accounts. The IRS explained that a common mistake it finds in defined contribution plans is that plan administrators place forfeitures in a separate plan account, “allowing them to accumulate over several years.”[2] The IRS stated that the “Internal Revenue Code does not allow this practice” and that forfeitures “must be used or allocated in the plan year incurred.” Later in the article, however, the IRS further stated that forfeitures used to pay plan expenses or reduce employer contributions should be used promptly in the year “they occurred or in appropriate situations no later than the immediately succeeding plan year.” (Emphasis added.) The IRS did not explain what would constitute an “appropriate situation.”

        More than a decade after the IRS issued its newsletter guidance, it is not uncommon to find defined contribution plans with forfeiture accounts that have been accumulating for years. The proposed regulations serve as a helpful reminder that forfeitures must be used promptly. In addition, the proposed regulations would help with the administration of defined contribution plans in three ways:

        1. Uses for Forfeitures: The proposed regulations clarify that forfeitures can be used for one or more of the following purposes: (i) to pay plan administrative expenses, (ii) to reduce employer contributions under the plan, or (iii) to increase benefits in other participants’ accounts in accordance with plan terms.
        2. Timing for Use of Forfeitures: The proposed regulations clarify that forfeitures must be used no later than 12 months after the close of the plan year in which the forfeiture occurs. Administrators will likely welcome this rule. It is simple and straightforward, and there is no need to determine whether an “appropriate situation” exists in order to use the forfeiture in the year following the year it arises.
        3. Transition Period: The proposed regulations include a helpful transition rule related to the 12-month deadline. Under the transition rule, forfeitures incurred during any plan year that begins before January 1, 2024, will be treated as having been incurred in the first plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2024. Presumably the IRS included this generous transition period because it is aware that there are many plans with large forfeiture accounts, built up over numerous years, and it wants to provide plan sponsors with time to address this forfeitures issue.

        The regulations are proposed to apply for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2024; however, taxpayers may rely on the proposed regulations for periods preceding the applicability date. Therefore, sponsors can use these proposed rules now.

        In light of the proposed regulations, we recommend that plan sponsors:

        1. Review the terms of their plan document regarding the use of forfeitures;
        2. Determine if their plan has forfeitures and, if so, the plan year(s) the forfeitures arose; and
        3. Analyze whether forfeitures are being administered in accordance with the terms of the plan and current law (in particular, whether forfeitures are being used timely and for proper purposes).

        If you conclude that forfeitures are not being administered properly, there are opportunities to correct the error and we would be happy to assist.

        We also recommend considering whether the terms of your plan should be amended. For example, if your plan document only allows forfeitures to be used to pay plan administrative expenses, or if it requires that forfeitures be used in the year incurred, amending the plan to expand the use of forfeitures or extend the time by which forfeitures must be used, as provided in the proposed regulations, would reduce the risk of an operational failure.

        If you have questions regarding your plan’s forfeiture account, please contact a member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] Although this post focuses on defined contribution plans, the proposed regulations would also affect defined benefit plans, reflecting changes in law since the original regulations (Treas. Reg. §1.401-7) were issued in 1963.

        [2] These accounts are often referred to as forfeiture accounts or suspense accounts.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Can AI Pass the Doctor Test? FDA Considers Physician-Inspired Evaluation of GenAI Devices and Other Regulatory Measures

        AI is entering healthcare with indomitable will. It promises to increase efficiency, reduce administrative burden (which healthcare providers so...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Attorney Annabel Rodriguez Named Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez has been recognized as a Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, and will be...
        Blog

        What Employee Benefits Lawyers Do (and How to Make the Best Use of Us)

        What do employee benefits lawyers do all day and how can clients make the best use of them? This post offers an overview of the kinds of things...
        Media Mentions

        Bloomberg Law Quotes Robert Keach on Expanded Access to Small Business Reorganization

        Verrill attorney Bob Keach was recently featured in Bloomberg Law, discussing legislation that would raise debt limits for bankruptcy relief and...
        Blog

        Phil Bartlett to Step Down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission

        On September 15, 2026, Governor Janet Mills announced that Phil Bartlett will step down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC)...
        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...