Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        IRS Guidance Expands Access to ACA Premium Tax Credit, Allows Cafeteria Plan Sponsors to Permit Employees to Revoke Family Coverage Mid-year

        by Karen K. Hartford on November 28, 2022

        Final Regulations under Section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code

        On October 11, 2022, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Final Regulations under Code Section 36B relating to eligibility for the Affordable Care Act’s (“ACA’s”) premium tax credit (“PTC” or “subsidy”). The Final Regulations expand eligibility for the PTC to certain family members of employees who were previously ineligible. Under Regulation Section 1.36B-1(d), an employee’s “family” includes the employee’s spouse filing a joint return with the employee and the employee’s tax dependents.

        Under the ACA, individuals generally will not qualify for a PTC if they are offered health coverage through an employer (“employer-based coverage”). Employer-based coverage may be offered by the individual’s own employer or may be available to the individual on account of an individual’s relationship to the employee, such as a spouse or child of the employee. There is an exception, however, that allows individuals to qualify for the PTC if their employer-based coverage is not “affordable.” Prior to the issuance of the Final Regulations, employer-based coverage was deemed affordable provided the employee’s premium cost for self-only coverage did not exceed 9.5 percent (adjusted annually for inflation) of the employee’s household income. In other words, the determination of whether each covered individual’s employer-based coverage was affordable was based on the employee’s self-only cost, even if the employee elected higher cost family coverage and the cost for such coverage exceeded 9.5 percent (as adjusted) of household income. This methodology for determining the affordability of employer-based coverage for related individuals could result in the employee’s family members being ineligible for a PTC, because often, while the cost of self-only coverage was affordable, the cost of family coverage was not. As a result, families in this situation found themselves being financially stretched or with family members going uninsured.

        Beginning in 2023, the Final Regulations repair this so-called “family glitch” by basing the affordability of employer-based coverage for a family member on the cost of family coverage, rather than the cost of employee-only coverage, thereby making it possible for family members who are offered unaffordable family coverage to qualify for the PTC through the Health Insurance Exchange (“Exchange”). Stated another way, going forward employer-based coverage will be affordable for covered family members only if the employee’s cost for family coverage does not exceed 9.5 percent (as adjusted) of household income. Importantly, the affordability of coverage for employees will continue to be determined based on the cost of self-only coverage.

        The Final Regulations are applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.

        IRS Notice 2022-41

        Companion guidance, in the form of IRS Notice 2022-41, was also published on October 11, 2022. Notice 2022-41 permits sponsors of Code Section 125 cafeteria plans to amend their plans to permit employee-participants to revoke an election for group health plan family coverage mid-year and make a new election to drop one or more family members on a prospective basis, provided the following conditions are met:

        (1) the dropped family member(s) are eligible to enroll in the Exchange, either during the annual enrollment period or a special enrollment period, and

        (2) the employee-participant represents that the dropped family members have either already enrolled in Exchange coverage or intend to enroll in Exchange coverage immediately.

        In 2022, the annual enrollment period for Exchange coverage begins November 1, 2022 and ends January 15, 2023. Special enrollment periods occur outside of that period on account of certain life events, which include, but are not limited to: losing other health coverage, getting married, having a baby or adopting a child.

        Of note, the Notice states that this new mid-year election change opportunity is not available with respect to flexible spending arrangements.

        When initially issued, Notice 2022-41 limited the application of this change to non-calendar year plans, but on November 9, the Notice was revised to remove the non-calendar year restriction; therefore, any cafeteria plan, regardless of plan year, may be amended to include the new mid-year election change event. For example, an employee who elected family coverage through their employer’s calendar year cafeteria plan in December 2022, but learns in early January that their spouse and dependent children could elect Exchange coverage with a premium subsidy that would be less costly than the employer coverage, could make an election to drop the employer-based family coverage and instead elect single coverage, thereby permitting their family members to elect the more affordable Exchange coverage — all assuming the employer amends its cafeteria plan to permit this new mid-year election change.

        As with all IRS-approved mid-year Section 125 election change events, this new event is optional. In our experience, many plan sponsors choose to include all permissible mid-year election change events in their plan documents to afford their employees maximum flexibility. Pursuant to Notice 2022-41, plan amendments are generally required by the end of the plan year in which the new election change event becomes operational, but there is a special rule for the 2023 plan year. For changes that affect a plan year beginning in 2023, amendments are not required until the last day of the first plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2024. For example, a plan with a plan year ending June 30 need not be amended until June 30, 2025. In all cases, amendments may be retroactive to the start of the plan year, so long as the plan is operated in accordance with the change and informs plan participants of the amendment. In no event, however, may participants revoke coverage on a retroactive basis.

        We expect some employers may experience cost savings by allowing this mid-year change to drop family members, whether due to administrative savings resulting from fewer participants or due to claims savings. However, it is also possible that participants who found employer-based coverage for family members unaffordable simply never enrolled their family members, and employers will see no cost savings. In any case, it does seem that including this new mid-year election change opportunity in employer cafeteria plans is another step to help ensure that as many Americans as possible can enroll in health care at a reasonable cost.

        Plan sponsors with questions about the Final Regulations or who wish to amend their cafeteria plan to permit this new election change event may contact any member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group for assistance.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...