Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        IRS Guidance Expands Access to ACA Premium Tax Credit, Allows Cafeteria Plan Sponsors to Permit Employees to Revoke Family Coverage Mid-year

        by Karen K. Hartford on November 28, 2022

        Final Regulations under Section 36B of the Internal Revenue Code

        On October 11, 2022, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Final Regulations under Code Section 36B relating to eligibility for the Affordable Care Act’s (“ACA’s”) premium tax credit (“PTC” or “subsidy”). The Final Regulations expand eligibility for the PTC to certain family members of employees who were previously ineligible. Under Regulation Section 1.36B-1(d), an employee’s “family” includes the employee’s spouse filing a joint return with the employee and the employee’s tax dependents.

        Under the ACA, individuals generally will not qualify for a PTC if they are offered health coverage through an employer (“employer-based coverage”). Employer-based coverage may be offered by the individual’s own employer or may be available to the individual on account of an individual’s relationship to the employee, such as a spouse or child of the employee. There is an exception, however, that allows individuals to qualify for the PTC if their employer-based coverage is not “affordable.” Prior to the issuance of the Final Regulations, employer-based coverage was deemed affordable provided the employee’s premium cost for self-only coverage did not exceed 9.5 percent (adjusted annually for inflation) of the employee’s household income. In other words, the determination of whether each covered individual’s employer-based coverage was affordable was based on the employee’s self-only cost, even if the employee elected higher cost family coverage and the cost for such coverage exceeded 9.5 percent (as adjusted) of household income. This methodology for determining the affordability of employer-based coverage for related individuals could result in the employee’s family members being ineligible for a PTC, because often, while the cost of self-only coverage was affordable, the cost of family coverage was not. As a result, families in this situation found themselves being financially stretched or with family members going uninsured.

        Beginning in 2023, the Final Regulations repair this so-called “family glitch” by basing the affordability of employer-based coverage for a family member on the cost of family coverage, rather than the cost of employee-only coverage, thereby making it possible for family members who are offered unaffordable family coverage to qualify for the PTC through the Health Insurance Exchange (“Exchange”). Stated another way, going forward employer-based coverage will be affordable for covered family members only if the employee’s cost for family coverage does not exceed 9.5 percent (as adjusted) of household income. Importantly, the affordability of coverage for employees will continue to be determined based on the cost of self-only coverage.

        The Final Regulations are applicable to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.

        IRS Notice 2022-41

        Companion guidance, in the form of IRS Notice 2022-41, was also published on October 11, 2022. Notice 2022-41 permits sponsors of Code Section 125 cafeteria plans to amend their plans to permit employee-participants to revoke an election for group health plan family coverage mid-year and make a new election to drop one or more family members on a prospective basis, provided the following conditions are met:

        (1) the dropped family member(s) are eligible to enroll in the Exchange, either during the annual enrollment period or a special enrollment period, and

        (2) the employee-participant represents that the dropped family members have either already enrolled in Exchange coverage or intend to enroll in Exchange coverage immediately.

        In 2022, the annual enrollment period for Exchange coverage begins November 1, 2022 and ends January 15, 2023. Special enrollment periods occur outside of that period on account of certain life events, which include, but are not limited to: losing other health coverage, getting married, having a baby or adopting a child.

        Of note, the Notice states that this new mid-year election change opportunity is not available with respect to flexible spending arrangements.

        When initially issued, Notice 2022-41 limited the application of this change to non-calendar year plans, but on November 9, the Notice was revised to remove the non-calendar year restriction; therefore, any cafeteria plan, regardless of plan year, may be amended to include the new mid-year election change event. For example, an employee who elected family coverage through their employer’s calendar year cafeteria plan in December 2022, but learns in early January that their spouse and dependent children could elect Exchange coverage with a premium subsidy that would be less costly than the employer coverage, could make an election to drop the employer-based family coverage and instead elect single coverage, thereby permitting their family members to elect the more affordable Exchange coverage — all assuming the employer amends its cafeteria plan to permit this new mid-year election change.

        As with all IRS-approved mid-year Section 125 election change events, this new event is optional. In our experience, many plan sponsors choose to include all permissible mid-year election change events in their plan documents to afford their employees maximum flexibility. Pursuant to Notice 2022-41, plan amendments are generally required by the end of the plan year in which the new election change event becomes operational, but there is a special rule for the 2023 plan year. For changes that affect a plan year beginning in 2023, amendments are not required until the last day of the first plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2024. For example, a plan with a plan year ending June 30 need not be amended until June 30, 2025. In all cases, amendments may be retroactive to the start of the plan year, so long as the plan is operated in accordance with the change and informs plan participants of the amendment. In no event, however, may participants revoke coverage on a retroactive basis.

        We expect some employers may experience cost savings by allowing this mid-year change to drop family members, whether due to administrative savings resulting from fewer participants or due to claims savings. However, it is also possible that participants who found employer-based coverage for family members unaffordable simply never enrolled their family members, and employers will see no cost savings. In any case, it does seem that including this new mid-year election change opportunity in employer cafeteria plans is another step to help ensure that as many Americans as possible can enroll in health care at a reasonable cost.

        Plan sponsors with questions about the Final Regulations or who wish to amend their cafeteria plan to permit this new election change event may contact any member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group for assistance.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...