Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        New IRS Guidance on Terminating Section 403(b) Plans

        by Eric D. Altholz on March 12, 2011

        Those of us who deal with Section 403(b) plans (a/k/a tax sheltered annuity plans) rejoiced when Treasury published Final Regulations under Code Section 403(b) back in 2007. Those regulations addressed many questions that either had not been dealt with, or had been dealt with only through a collection of periodic IRS administrative pronouncements. High on the list of previously unanswered questions was whether (and how) a Section 403(b) plan could be terminated. The Final Regulations do explain how to terminate a 403(b) plan, but a number of questions remained particularly in the case of plans that contain individual annuity contracts. IRS Revenue Ruling 2011-7 answers many of those questions and also offers some helpful clarifications of the rules contained in the Final Regulations.

        For one thing, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 provides a useful exception to the general rule that an employer wishing to terminate a 403(b) plan must “make no contributions to any Section 403(b) contract that is not a part of the plan” for the period beginning on the plan termination date and ending 12 months after all assets of the terminated plan have been distributed. Under the exception the “no contributions” rule would not apply if, at all times during the period beginning 12 months before the termination and ending 12 months after the distribution of all assets from the terminated plan, fewer than 2% of the employees eligible under the terminating 403(b) plan as of the termination date were eligible under another 403(b) plan.

        The ruling reaffirms that a plan will not be considered terminated unless all accumulated benefits are distributed to all participants and beneficiaries as soon as administratively practicable after the termination date. However, the ruling states that the distribution of a fully paid individual annuity contract will be considered a distribution for purposes of terminating a 403(b) plan. This makes sense because the plan sponsor will have effectively disposed of its obligation to pay the benefit by arranging for the payment by the issuer of the annuity contract.

        Finally, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 clarifies the timing of the taxation of terminating distributions. In the case of a distribution in the form of an individual annuity contract (or a certificate evidencing fully paid benefits under a group annuity contract), the benefit will not be taxed until amounts are actually paid to the participant or beneficiary under the contract. Any other terminating distributions (lump payments, installments, etc.) would be subject to income tax at the time of payment unless the participant or beneficiary elects a direct rollover to an IRA or eligible retirement plan, or completes a transfer to an IRA or other eligible retirement plan within 60 days after the distribution – i.e., the normal rules apply.

        The purest of technicians will complain that Rev. Rul. 2011-7 leaves unanswered one important question: can individually owned custodial accounts be treated the same way as individual annuity contracts in the context of a termination where the employer has no control? One would think the answer would be yes, though further guidance from the IRS will be necessary to confirm that. Nevertheless, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 provided very helpful guidance to employers who want to terminate 403(b) plans that contain individual annuity contracts. Of course, getting the insurance company that issued the contracts to cooperate is another matter!

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        Working 9 to 5? It’s a Way to Make a Livin’, so Make Sure You’re Payin’ for Every Minute: A Maine Employer’s Guide to Stacked Wage & Hour Rules

        Four decades after Dolly Parton gave us both the namesake anthem of the American workday and the film about three fed-up office workers’ dreams of...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Can AI Pass the Doctor Test? FDA Considers Physician-Inspired Evaluation of GenAI Devices and Other Regulatory Measures

        AI is entering healthcare with indomitable will. It promises to increase efficiency, reduce administrative burden (which healthcare providers so...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Attorney Annabel Rodriguez Named Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez has been recognized as a Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, and will be...
        Blog

        What Employee Benefits Lawyers Do (and How to Make the Best Use of Us)

        What do employee benefits lawyers do all day and how can clients make the best use of them? This post offers an overview of the kinds of things...
        Media Mentions

        Bloomberg Law Quotes Robert Keach on Expanded Access to Small Business Reorganization

        Verrill attorney Bob Keach was recently featured in Bloomberg Law, discussing legislation that would raise debt limits for bankruptcy relief and...
        Blog

        Phil Bartlett to Step Down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission

        On September 15, 2026, Governor Janet Mills announced that Phil Bartlett will step down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC)...
        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...