Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        New IRS Guidance on Terminating Section 403(b) Plans

        by Eric D. Altholz on March 12, 2011

        Those of us who deal with Section 403(b) plans (a/k/a tax sheltered annuity plans) rejoiced when Treasury published Final Regulations under Code Section 403(b) back in 2007. Those regulations addressed many questions that either had not been dealt with, or had been dealt with only through a collection of periodic IRS administrative pronouncements. High on the list of previously unanswered questions was whether (and how) a Section 403(b) plan could be terminated. The Final Regulations do explain how to terminate a 403(b) plan, but a number of questions remained particularly in the case of plans that contain individual annuity contracts. IRS Revenue Ruling 2011-7 answers many of those questions and also offers some helpful clarifications of the rules contained in the Final Regulations.

        For one thing, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 provides a useful exception to the general rule that an employer wishing to terminate a 403(b) plan must “make no contributions to any Section 403(b) contract that is not a part of the plan” for the period beginning on the plan termination date and ending 12 months after all assets of the terminated plan have been distributed. Under the exception the “no contributions” rule would not apply if, at all times during the period beginning 12 months before the termination and ending 12 months after the distribution of all assets from the terminated plan, fewer than 2% of the employees eligible under the terminating 403(b) plan as of the termination date were eligible under another 403(b) plan.

        The ruling reaffirms that a plan will not be considered terminated unless all accumulated benefits are distributed to all participants and beneficiaries as soon as administratively practicable after the termination date. However, the ruling states that the distribution of a fully paid individual annuity contract will be considered a distribution for purposes of terminating a 403(b) plan. This makes sense because the plan sponsor will have effectively disposed of its obligation to pay the benefit by arranging for the payment by the issuer of the annuity contract.

        Finally, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 clarifies the timing of the taxation of terminating distributions. In the case of a distribution in the form of an individual annuity contract (or a certificate evidencing fully paid benefits under a group annuity contract), the benefit will not be taxed until amounts are actually paid to the participant or beneficiary under the contract. Any other terminating distributions (lump payments, installments, etc.) would be subject to income tax at the time of payment unless the participant or beneficiary elects a direct rollover to an IRA or eligible retirement plan, or completes a transfer to an IRA or other eligible retirement plan within 60 days after the distribution – i.e., the normal rules apply.

        The purest of technicians will complain that Rev. Rul. 2011-7 leaves unanswered one important question: can individually owned custodial accounts be treated the same way as individual annuity contracts in the context of a termination where the employer has no control? One would think the answer would be yes, though further guidance from the IRS will be necessary to confirm that. Nevertheless, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 provided very helpful guidance to employers who want to terminate 403(b) plans that contain individual annuity contracts. Of course, getting the insurance company that issued the contracts to cooperate is another matter!

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...