Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        New IRS Guidance on Terminating Section 403(b) Plans

        by Eric D. Altholz on March 12, 2011

        Those of us who deal with Section 403(b) plans (a/k/a tax sheltered annuity plans) rejoiced when Treasury published Final Regulations under Code Section 403(b) back in 2007. Those regulations addressed many questions that either had not been dealt with, or had been dealt with only through a collection of periodic IRS administrative pronouncements. High on the list of previously unanswered questions was whether (and how) a Section 403(b) plan could be terminated. The Final Regulations do explain how to terminate a 403(b) plan, but a number of questions remained particularly in the case of plans that contain individual annuity contracts. IRS Revenue Ruling 2011-7 answers many of those questions and also offers some helpful clarifications of the rules contained in the Final Regulations.

        For one thing, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 provides a useful exception to the general rule that an employer wishing to terminate a 403(b) plan must “make no contributions to any Section 403(b) contract that is not a part of the plan” for the period beginning on the plan termination date and ending 12 months after all assets of the terminated plan have been distributed. Under the exception the “no contributions” rule would not apply if, at all times during the period beginning 12 months before the termination and ending 12 months after the distribution of all assets from the terminated plan, fewer than 2% of the employees eligible under the terminating 403(b) plan as of the termination date were eligible under another 403(b) plan.

        The ruling reaffirms that a plan will not be considered terminated unless all accumulated benefits are distributed to all participants and beneficiaries as soon as administratively practicable after the termination date. However, the ruling states that the distribution of a fully paid individual annuity contract will be considered a distribution for purposes of terminating a 403(b) plan. This makes sense because the plan sponsor will have effectively disposed of its obligation to pay the benefit by arranging for the payment by the issuer of the annuity contract.

        Finally, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 clarifies the timing of the taxation of terminating distributions. In the case of a distribution in the form of an individual annuity contract (or a certificate evidencing fully paid benefits under a group annuity contract), the benefit will not be taxed until amounts are actually paid to the participant or beneficiary under the contract. Any other terminating distributions (lump payments, installments, etc.) would be subject to income tax at the time of payment unless the participant or beneficiary elects a direct rollover to an IRA or eligible retirement plan, or completes a transfer to an IRA or other eligible retirement plan within 60 days after the distribution – i.e., the normal rules apply.

        The purest of technicians will complain that Rev. Rul. 2011-7 leaves unanswered one important question: can individually owned custodial accounts be treated the same way as individual annuity contracts in the context of a termination where the employer has no control? One would think the answer would be yes, though further guidance from the IRS will be necessary to confirm that. Nevertheless, Rev. Rul. 2011-7 provided very helpful guidance to employers who want to terminate 403(b) plans that contain individual annuity contracts. Of course, getting the insurance company that issued the contracts to cooperate is another matter!

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...