Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Student Loans and Code Section 127 Educational Assistance Programs: A Reminder from the IRS, FAQs, and a Sample Plan Document

        by Anna Mikhaylina on September 13, 2024

        On August 28, the IRS issued IR-2024-227, reminding employers of the following key aspects of educational assistance programs under Internal Revenue Code Section 127:

        • They can be used to help reimburse the costs of or pay for employees’ student loans through December 31, 2025;
        • They must be established in writing and cannot discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees;
        • In most cases, benefits under such programs are excluded from federal income tax withholding, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and federal unemployment (FUTA) tax; and
        • Tax-free educational benefits are limited to $5,250 per employee per year.

        Earlier this summer, the IRS also issued Fact Sheet 2024-22 with FAQs regarding educational assistance programs. Of note, the FAQs include a sample plan document that employers can modify to establish an educational assistance program, and they provide protection from penalties based on reasonable, good faith reliance on the FAQs. This post focuses on the student loan aspects of the FAQs and provides actionable steps for employers who offer, or intend to offer, an educational assistance program.

        Background

        For many years, employers have offered educational assistance programs to assist employees with the cost of tuition, fees, books, equipment, and supplies on a tax-free basis. In 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act amended Code Section 127 to add certain student loan payments to the types of eligible educational assistance available.

        The FAQs

        The FAQs restate the IRS’s prior guidance on educational assistance programs and, for the first time, provide guidance regarding the treatment of student loans. With respect to student loans, the FAQs state that:

        • the loans must be incurred by the employee for the education of the employee only, not a spouse or a child of the employee;
        • when the loan was incurred does not matter;
        • only loans for education at an “eligible educational institution” qualify, and “eligible educational institutions” include:
        • any college, university, vocational school, or other postsecondary educational institution as defined in Code Sections 221(d)(2) and 25A(f)(2);[1]
        • an institution conducting an internship or residency program leading to a degree or certificate awarded by an institution of higher education, a hospital, or a health care facility that offers postgraduate training;[2]
        • only student loan debt incurred for tuition, fees, books, equipment, and supplies qualifies;
        • loan payments paid or reimbursed by the employer must be made during the period beginning March 28, 2020 and ending December 31, 2025 (unless extended by future legislation) and may be paid directly to a third party such as an educational provider or a loan servicer, or directly to the employee;
        • if an employee seeks reimbursement for student loan payments, the payments must be paid by the employee while an employee and in the same calendar year for which reimbursement is made by the employer;
        • the total amount that the employee can exclude from gross income for payments of principal or interest on student loans and other educational assistance under Code Section 127 is $5,250 per calendar year; and
        • “unused” amounts of the $5,250 annual limit cannot be carried forward to subsequent years.

        For example, an employer may reimburse an employee in 2025 for the payments made in 2025 on student debt incurred by the employee in 2015 prior to employment if the other requirements described above are satisfied, but an employer cannot reimburse the employee after 2025 for any student loan payments.

        Reliance on FAQs

        The IRS expressly states in Fact Sheet 2024-22 that:

        • taxpayers who rely in good faith on the FAQs will satisfy the reasonable cause standard for penalty relief, and
        • if an FAQ turns out to be an inaccurate statement of the law as applied to a particular taxpayer’s case, the law will control the taxpayer’s tax liability, not the FAQs.

        What should employers do?

        Employers who offer, or intend to offer, an educational assistance program should:

        • maintain a written plan and provide reasonable notice of the availability of the program to employees;
        • if providing student loan assistance as part of the program, ensure the terms of the plan reflect that; and
        • review the IRS sample plan, which includes: (1) optional provisions that allow the employer to choose whether or not to include student loans as an educational assistance benefit under the plan; and (2) mandatory provisions describing non-discrimination and substantiation requirements.

        As a design matter, employers may also want to consider limiting eligibility for the program to employees who are not highly compensated as defined by Code Section 414(q).[3] This will dramatically simplify administration of the program because the program would automatically pass required non-discrimination testing.[4]

        Overall, the reminder, the FAQs, and the sample plan document are valuable tools for employers that have established, or are looking to establish, educational assistance programs.

        Anything else about student loans?

        For plan years beginning after December 31, 2024, SECURE 2.0 allows employers to make matching contributions to certain retirement plans based on qualified student loan payments by employees. Our August post describes in detail the IRS guidance on this change in the law.

        If you have any questions regarding Code Section 127 educational assistance programs, including the student loan feature, please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] The Department of Education determines whether an organization is an eligible education institution. A loan, however, does not have to be issued or guaranteed under a Federal postsecondary education loan program to be a qualified education loan.

        [2] Code Section 221(d)(2)(B).

        [3] Generally, an employee who: (1) during the current plan year or the preceding plan year was at any time a more than 5% owner of the employer; or (2) received compensation from the employer for the preceding plan year in excess of $150,000 (for 2024) is a highly compensated employee for the current plan year.

        [4] Note, there is an additional limit relating to more than 5% owners of the employer: not more than 5% of the amounts paid or incurred by the employer for educational assistance during the year may be provided for such individuals (or their spouses or dependents), considered together as a group.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...
        Media Mentions

        Martha Gaythwaite Featured in Portland Press Herald Coverage of Sig Sauer Trial Victory

        Verrill attorney Martha Gaythwaite was highlighted in media coverage of a federal trial in Bangor involving firearm manufacturer Sig Sauer. As...
        Media Mentions

        Law360 Quotes Robert Keach on Senate Bill Affecting Small Business Restructurings

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article discussing federal legislation that would permanently restore the $7.5 million...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SAFEs and Preferred Stock – Key Deal Terms Every Founder Should Know

        SAFEs Before negotiating a term sheet for preferred stock, many early-stage companies, particularly at the seed stage, first raise capital through...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Business Restructuring and Insolvency Attorney Nimra Tariq

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Nimra Tariq has joined the firm’s Business Restructuring and Insolvency Group as an...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Provides Commentary on First Brands Restructuring in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was quoted in the Law360 article, "First Brands' Ch. 11 Plan Revives Angst Over Admin Claims," discussing First Brands...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Construction Attorney Cassie Dufon

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to welcome Cassie Dufon to the firm’s Construction Group as an Associate, resident in the firm’s Portland...
        Press Releases

        Verrill’s Wide-Ranging Private Wealth Law Practice Recognized in 2026 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide

        BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine and BOSTON, Mass. – Verrill attorneys Kenneth P. Brier, Anya F. Endsley, Kurt E. Klebe, Mary McQuillen, Nathaniel S....
        Blog

        Update on Status of Maine Packaging EPR

        In December 2024, Verrill published a blog post, Unwrapping Maine's Gift to the Environment: A New Packaging Stewardship Program Set to Launch in...