Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Student Loans and Code Section 127 Educational Assistance Programs: A Reminder from the IRS, FAQs, and a Sample Plan Document

        by Anna Mikhaylina on September 13, 2024

        On August 28, the IRS issued IR-2024-227, reminding employers of the following key aspects of educational assistance programs under Internal Revenue Code Section 127:

        • They can be used to help reimburse the costs of or pay for employees’ student loans through December 31, 2025;
        • They must be established in writing and cannot discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees;
        • In most cases, benefits under such programs are excluded from federal income tax withholding, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and federal unemployment (FUTA) tax; and
        • Tax-free educational benefits are limited to $5,250 per employee per year.

        Earlier this summer, the IRS also issued Fact Sheet 2024-22 with FAQs regarding educational assistance programs. Of note, the FAQs include a sample plan document that employers can modify to establish an educational assistance program, and they provide protection from penalties based on reasonable, good faith reliance on the FAQs. This post focuses on the student loan aspects of the FAQs and provides actionable steps for employers who offer, or intend to offer, an educational assistance program.

        Background

        For many years, employers have offered educational assistance programs to assist employees with the cost of tuition, fees, books, equipment, and supplies on a tax-free basis. In 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act amended Code Section 127 to add certain student loan payments to the types of eligible educational assistance available.

        The FAQs

        The FAQs restate the IRS’s prior guidance on educational assistance programs and, for the first time, provide guidance regarding the treatment of student loans. With respect to student loans, the FAQs state that:

        • the loans must be incurred by the employee for the education of the employee only, not a spouse or a child of the employee;
        • when the loan was incurred does not matter;
        • only loans for education at an “eligible educational institution” qualify, and “eligible educational institutions” include:
        • any college, university, vocational school, or other postsecondary educational institution as defined in Code Sections 221(d)(2) and 25A(f)(2);[1]
        • an institution conducting an internship or residency program leading to a degree or certificate awarded by an institution of higher education, a hospital, or a health care facility that offers postgraduate training;[2]
        • only student loan debt incurred for tuition, fees, books, equipment, and supplies qualifies;
        • loan payments paid or reimbursed by the employer must be made during the period beginning March 28, 2020 and ending December 31, 2025 (unless extended by future legislation) and may be paid directly to a third party such as an educational provider or a loan servicer, or directly to the employee;
        • if an employee seeks reimbursement for student loan payments, the payments must be paid by the employee while an employee and in the same calendar year for which reimbursement is made by the employer;
        • the total amount that the employee can exclude from gross income for payments of principal or interest on student loans and other educational assistance under Code Section 127 is $5,250 per calendar year; and
        • “unused” amounts of the $5,250 annual limit cannot be carried forward to subsequent years.

        For example, an employer may reimburse an employee in 2025 for the payments made in 2025 on student debt incurred by the employee in 2015 prior to employment if the other requirements described above are satisfied, but an employer cannot reimburse the employee after 2025 for any student loan payments.

        Reliance on FAQs

        The IRS expressly states in Fact Sheet 2024-22 that:

        • taxpayers who rely in good faith on the FAQs will satisfy the reasonable cause standard for penalty relief, and
        • if an FAQ turns out to be an inaccurate statement of the law as applied to a particular taxpayer’s case, the law will control the taxpayer’s tax liability, not the FAQs.

        What should employers do?

        Employers who offer, or intend to offer, an educational assistance program should:

        • maintain a written plan and provide reasonable notice of the availability of the program to employees;
        • if providing student loan assistance as part of the program, ensure the terms of the plan reflect that; and
        • review the IRS sample plan, which includes: (1) optional provisions that allow the employer to choose whether or not to include student loans as an educational assistance benefit under the plan; and (2) mandatory provisions describing non-discrimination and substantiation requirements.

        As a design matter, employers may also want to consider limiting eligibility for the program to employees who are not highly compensated as defined by Code Section 414(q).[3] This will dramatically simplify administration of the program because the program would automatically pass required non-discrimination testing.[4]

        Overall, the reminder, the FAQs, and the sample plan document are valuable tools for employers that have established, or are looking to establish, educational assistance programs.

        Anything else about student loans?

        For plan years beginning after December 31, 2024, SECURE 2.0 allows employers to make matching contributions to certain retirement plans based on qualified student loan payments by employees. Our August post describes in detail the IRS guidance on this change in the law.

        If you have any questions regarding Code Section 127 educational assistance programs, including the student loan feature, please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] The Department of Education determines whether an organization is an eligible education institution. A loan, however, does not have to be issued or guaranteed under a Federal postsecondary education loan program to be a qualified education loan.

        [2] Code Section 221(d)(2)(B).

        [3] Generally, an employee who: (1) during the current plan year or the preceding plan year was at any time a more than 5% owner of the employer; or (2) received compensation from the employer for the preceding plan year in excess of $150,000 (for 2024) is a highly compensated employee for the current plan year.

        [4] Note, there is an additional limit relating to more than 5% owners of the employer: not more than 5% of the amounts paid or incurred by the employer for educational assistance during the year may be provided for such individuals (or their spouses or dependents), considered together as a group.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Recent FinCEN Advisory Highlights Rising Health Care Fraud Risk for Financial Institutions

        As the federal government intensifies its “whole of government” approach to combat fraud, waste, and abuse, particularly in Federal Health Care...
        Press Releases

        Two Verrill Attorneys Featured in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Bankruptcy & Restructuring Lawyers List

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill attorneys Roger A. Clement, Jr. and Robert J. Keach have been featured in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global...
        Published Works

        Verrill Attorney Mark Googins Co-Authors Maine Commercial Lending Handbook

        Verrill attorney Mark Googins has co-authored the Maine Commercial Lending Handbook (Second Edition), published March 2026.  A trusted, practical...