Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Student Loans and Code Section 127 Educational Assistance Programs: A Reminder from the IRS, FAQs, and a Sample Plan Document

        by Anna Mikhaylina on September 13, 2024

        On August 28, the IRS issued IR-2024-227, reminding employers of the following key aspects of educational assistance programs under Internal Revenue Code Section 127:

        • They can be used to help reimburse the costs of or pay for employees’ student loans through December 31, 2025;
        • They must be established in writing and cannot discriminate in favor of highly compensated employees;
        • In most cases, benefits under such programs are excluded from federal income tax withholding, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and federal unemployment (FUTA) tax; and
        • Tax-free educational benefits are limited to $5,250 per employee per year.

        Earlier this summer, the IRS also issued Fact Sheet 2024-22 with FAQs regarding educational assistance programs. Of note, the FAQs include a sample plan document that employers can modify to establish an educational assistance program, and they provide protection from penalties based on reasonable, good faith reliance on the FAQs. This post focuses on the student loan aspects of the FAQs and provides actionable steps for employers who offer, or intend to offer, an educational assistance program.

        Background

        For many years, employers have offered educational assistance programs to assist employees with the cost of tuition, fees, books, equipment, and supplies on a tax-free basis. In 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act amended Code Section 127 to add certain student loan payments to the types of eligible educational assistance available.

        The FAQs

        The FAQs restate the IRS’s prior guidance on educational assistance programs and, for the first time, provide guidance regarding the treatment of student loans. With respect to student loans, the FAQs state that:

        • the loans must be incurred by the employee for the education of the employee only, not a spouse or a child of the employee;
        • when the loan was incurred does not matter;
        • only loans for education at an “eligible educational institution” qualify, and “eligible educational institutions” include:
        • any college, university, vocational school, or other postsecondary educational institution as defined in Code Sections 221(d)(2) and 25A(f)(2);[1]
        • an institution conducting an internship or residency program leading to a degree or certificate awarded by an institution of higher education, a hospital, or a health care facility that offers postgraduate training;[2]
        • only student loan debt incurred for tuition, fees, books, equipment, and supplies qualifies;
        • loan payments paid or reimbursed by the employer must be made during the period beginning March 28, 2020 and ending December 31, 2025 (unless extended by future legislation) and may be paid directly to a third party such as an educational provider or a loan servicer, or directly to the employee;
        • if an employee seeks reimbursement for student loan payments, the payments must be paid by the employee while an employee and in the same calendar year for which reimbursement is made by the employer;
        • the total amount that the employee can exclude from gross income for payments of principal or interest on student loans and other educational assistance under Code Section 127 is $5,250 per calendar year; and
        • “unused” amounts of the $5,250 annual limit cannot be carried forward to subsequent years.

        For example, an employer may reimburse an employee in 2025 for the payments made in 2025 on student debt incurred by the employee in 2015 prior to employment if the other requirements described above are satisfied, but an employer cannot reimburse the employee after 2025 for any student loan payments.

        Reliance on FAQs

        The IRS expressly states in Fact Sheet 2024-22 that:

        • taxpayers who rely in good faith on the FAQs will satisfy the reasonable cause standard for penalty relief, and
        • if an FAQ turns out to be an inaccurate statement of the law as applied to a particular taxpayer’s case, the law will control the taxpayer’s tax liability, not the FAQs.

        What should employers do?

        Employers who offer, or intend to offer, an educational assistance program should:

        • maintain a written plan and provide reasonable notice of the availability of the program to employees;
        • if providing student loan assistance as part of the program, ensure the terms of the plan reflect that; and
        • review the IRS sample plan, which includes: (1) optional provisions that allow the employer to choose whether or not to include student loans as an educational assistance benefit under the plan; and (2) mandatory provisions describing non-discrimination and substantiation requirements.

        As a design matter, employers may also want to consider limiting eligibility for the program to employees who are not highly compensated as defined by Code Section 414(q).[3] This will dramatically simplify administration of the program because the program would automatically pass required non-discrimination testing.[4]

        Overall, the reminder, the FAQs, and the sample plan document are valuable tools for employers that have established, or are looking to establish, educational assistance programs.

        Anything else about student loans?

        For plan years beginning after December 31, 2024, SECURE 2.0 allows employers to make matching contributions to certain retirement plans based on qualified student loan payments by employees. Our August post describes in detail the IRS guidance on this change in the law.

        If you have any questions regarding Code Section 127 educational assistance programs, including the student loan feature, please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] The Department of Education determines whether an organization is an eligible education institution. A loan, however, does not have to be issued or guaranteed under a Federal postsecondary education loan program to be a qualified education loan.

        [2] Code Section 221(d)(2)(B).

        [3] Generally, an employee who: (1) during the current plan year or the preceding plan year was at any time a more than 5% owner of the employer; or (2) received compensation from the employer for the preceding plan year in excess of $150,000 (for 2024) is a highly compensated employee for the current plan year.

        [4] Note, there is an additional limit relating to more than 5% owners of the employer: not more than 5% of the amounts paid or incurred by the employer for educational assistance during the year may be provided for such individuals (or their spouses or dependents), considered together as a group.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...