Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        What Employers Need to Know About The Families First Coronavirus Response Act – An Animation

        by Tawny L. Alvarez on October 20, 2020

        Navigating the ins and outs of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) can be difficult for employers. This animation seeks to illustrate some of the most important takeaways.

        Transcript:

        Hi, I’m Tawny, a partner in Verrill’s Labor & Employment Practice Group. The Families First Coronavirus Response Act provides relief for many employees who may have a need to be out of work to care for children whose school or care provider is closed as a result of COVID-19. As children begin the process of returning to school, however, the different models and structures being employed by school districts creates confusion for employers as how to calculate time away from work that is protected by the Families First Coronavirus Response Act.

        Here are some things that you need to keep in mind during the process. First, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act provides employees with up to 12 weeks paid sick leave and expanded family and medical leave, paid at two-thirds of the regular rate of pay up to $200 daily and $12,000 total if the employee is caring for their children or child whose school or place of care is closed or unavailable for COVID-19 related reasons.

        Second, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act leave is available only if the employee is unable to work, which means unable to work at the job site or to telework because of these childcare issues.

        Third, the Depart of Labor has clarified how to deal with hybrid return to school models. Noting that if an employee’s child is not permitted to attend school in person and must engage in remote learning, that if the employee is actually caring for their child during the remote learning time and no other suitable person is available to do so, the employee will be entitled to families first coronavirus response leave on the remote learning days.

        Fourth, if the employee’s child’s school is open, but the parent has chosen to participate in a remote learning program or option. In that situation the school is not closed or unavailable under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act and protected leave would not be available.

        Finally, if the employee’s school is only offering remote learning, so if their child’s school is only offering remote learning, all time that is spent actually caring for their child during that remote learning time, when no other suitable person is available to do so, will be protected leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act.

        So, considering these factors, here is some helpful advice concerning things you can do to navigate the complex nature of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act as students begin to return to school. First, when an employee indicates that they have a need for leave under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, ask follow up questions concerning the district’s return-to-school plan and what days the child or children will be learning remotely versus in person. Second, confirm with the employee their need to provide care to the child and confirm that there is no other suitable person available to do so. Third, determine whether the employee can work remotely during the time or whether physical presence at a work site is an essential function of the employee’s position. Fourth, identify the amount of Families First Coronavirus Response Act time that the employee has available. If they have already taken Families First Coronavirus Response Act or Family and Medical Leave Act leave, or they’re not full-time employees they would not have 480 hours or 12 weeks of leave available.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...