Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        When Cash is not King: Holiday Gifts as “De Minimis” Fringe Benefits

        by Anna Mikhaylina on December 15, 2022

        To celebrate the holiday season, this post highlights the tax consequences of employer-sponsored holiday perks such as gift cards, turkeys, hams and gift baskets. Under the current tax rules, employers may give infrequent low value gifts of property or services to employees on a tax-free basis.[1] Cash and cash equivalents, however, constitute taxable income to the employee.[2]

        As a rule, fringe, or incidental, benefits are considered part of an employee’s gross income as a type of compensation for services, similar to wages. Section 132 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and related Treasury Regulations establish many exceptions to the rule, including an exception for “de minimis” fringe benefits – items or services nominal in value and historically used for holiday gifts to employees.[3]

        As early as 1959, an IRS revenue ruling permitted tax-free treatment of “a turkey, ham, or other items of merchandise of similar nominal value, distributed by an employer to an employee at Christmas, or a comparable holiday, as part of a general distribution […] as a means of promoting their good will.”[4] The revenue ruling also stated that the favorable tax treatment does not apply to “cash, gift certificates, and similar items of readily convertible cash value.” Gift cards are treated the same as cash.

        Even with the emergence of the robust gift card industry, the revenue ruling remains relevant today. To qualify as a tax-free de minimis fringe benefit, a gift from an employer must be of nominal value, infrequent, and not similar to cash. Treasury Regulations under Section 132 of the Code explain that the term “de minimis fringe” includes both property and services “the value (considering how frequently similar benefits are provided) of which is so small as to make accounting for it unreasonable or administratively impracticable.”[5] The Treasury Regulations provide that de minimis fringe benefits include “occasional cocktail parties, group meals, or picnics for employees and their guests; traditional birthday or holiday gifts of property (not cash) with a low fair market value; occasional theater or sporting event tickets; coffee, doughnuts, and soft drinks; flowers, fruit, books, or similar property provided to employees under special circumstances.”[6]

        Notably, the Treasury Regulations specify that cash is not excludable from income even when it is provided to purchase property or services that would be excludable as a de minimis fringe benefit if provided in kind.[7] For example, when an employer provides cash to an employee to buy a theater ticket, the cash is not excluded from the employee’s income as a tax-free de minimis fringe benefit, but if the employer gives an employee a theater ticket, it is excluded (if all other requirements are satisfied).

        The takeaway from this post is that the tax rules treat cash and noncash gifts from the employer very differently. Gift cards and cash are always taxable income to the employee, whether it is just another Monday or New Year’s Eve. Infrequently distributed, low value gifts of property or services may qualify as tax-free under the exception for de minimis fringe benefits.

        If you have questions regarding de minimis fringe benefits described in this post, or any other aspect of providing fringe benefits, please contact any member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] The 2022 edition of the IRS Fringe Benefits Guide explains that
        “The law does not specify a value threshold for benefits to qualify as de minimis. The determination will always depend on facts and circumstances. The IRS has given advice at least once, in 2001, that a benefit valued at $100 did not qualify as de minimis. However, this technical advice addresses a specific situation and cannot be relied upon in addressing another specific situation.”

        [2] There is, however, a limited exception for meal money under Treasury Regulation §1.132-6(d)(2)(i)(C).

        [3] Among other types of fringe benefits that may be excluded from employee’s gross income are qualified employee discounts, working condition fringes, qualified retirement planning services, and certain employee achievement awards and prizes.

        [4] Rev. Rul. 59-58, 1959-1 C.B. 17.

        [5] Treasury Regulation § 1.132-6(a).

        [6] Treasury Regulation § 1.132-6(e)(1).

        [7] Treasury Regulation § 1.132-6(c).

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...