Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        When Cash is not King: Holiday Gifts as “De Minimis” Fringe Benefits

        by Anna Mikhaylina on December 15, 2022

        To celebrate the holiday season, this post highlights the tax consequences of employer-sponsored holiday perks such as gift cards, turkeys, hams and gift baskets. Under the current tax rules, employers may give infrequent low value gifts of property or services to employees on a tax-free basis.[1] Cash and cash equivalents, however, constitute taxable income to the employee.[2]

        As a rule, fringe, or incidental, benefits are considered part of an employee’s gross income as a type of compensation for services, similar to wages. Section 132 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and related Treasury Regulations establish many exceptions to the rule, including an exception for “de minimis” fringe benefits – items or services nominal in value and historically used for holiday gifts to employees.[3]

        As early as 1959, an IRS revenue ruling permitted tax-free treatment of “a turkey, ham, or other items of merchandise of similar nominal value, distributed by an employer to an employee at Christmas, or a comparable holiday, as part of a general distribution […] as a means of promoting their good will.”[4] The revenue ruling also stated that the favorable tax treatment does not apply to “cash, gift certificates, and similar items of readily convertible cash value.” Gift cards are treated the same as cash.

        Even with the emergence of the robust gift card industry, the revenue ruling remains relevant today. To qualify as a tax-free de minimis fringe benefit, a gift from an employer must be of nominal value, infrequent, and not similar to cash. Treasury Regulations under Section 132 of the Code explain that the term “de minimis fringe” includes both property and services “the value (considering how frequently similar benefits are provided) of which is so small as to make accounting for it unreasonable or administratively impracticable.”[5] The Treasury Regulations provide that de minimis fringe benefits include “occasional cocktail parties, group meals, or picnics for employees and their guests; traditional birthday or holiday gifts of property (not cash) with a low fair market value; occasional theater or sporting event tickets; coffee, doughnuts, and soft drinks; flowers, fruit, books, or similar property provided to employees under special circumstances.”[6]

        Notably, the Treasury Regulations specify that cash is not excludable from income even when it is provided to purchase property or services that would be excludable as a de minimis fringe benefit if provided in kind.[7] For example, when an employer provides cash to an employee to buy a theater ticket, the cash is not excluded from the employee’s income as a tax-free de minimis fringe benefit, but if the employer gives an employee a theater ticket, it is excluded (if all other requirements are satisfied).

        The takeaway from this post is that the tax rules treat cash and noncash gifts from the employer very differently. Gift cards and cash are always taxable income to the employee, whether it is just another Monday or New Year’s Eve. Infrequently distributed, low value gifts of property or services may qualify as tax-free under the exception for de minimis fringe benefits.

        If you have questions regarding de minimis fringe benefits described in this post, or any other aspect of providing fringe benefits, please contact any member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] The 2022 edition of the IRS Fringe Benefits Guide explains that
        “The law does not specify a value threshold for benefits to qualify as de minimis. The determination will always depend on facts and circumstances. The IRS has given advice at least once, in 2001, that a benefit valued at $100 did not qualify as de minimis. However, this technical advice addresses a specific situation and cannot be relied upon in addressing another specific situation.”

        [2] There is, however, a limited exception for meal money under Treasury Regulation §1.132-6(d)(2)(i)(C).

        [3] Among other types of fringe benefits that may be excluded from employee’s gross income are qualified employee discounts, working condition fringes, qualified retirement planning services, and certain employee achievement awards and prizes.

        [4] Rev. Rul. 59-58, 1959-1 C.B. 17.

        [5] Treasury Regulation § 1.132-6(a).

        [6] Treasury Regulation § 1.132-6(e)(1).

        [7] Treasury Regulation § 1.132-6(c).

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Recent FinCEN Advisory Highlights Rising Health Care Fraud Risk for Financial Institutions

        As the federal government intensifies its “whole of government” approach to combat fraud, waste, and abuse, particularly in Federal Health Care...
        Press Releases

        Two Verrill Attorneys Featured in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Bankruptcy & Restructuring Lawyers List

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill attorneys Roger A. Clement, Jr. and Robert J. Keach have been featured in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global...
        Published Works

        Verrill Attorney Mark Googins Co-Authors Maine Commercial Lending Handbook

        Verrill attorney Mark Googins has co-authored the Maine Commercial Lending Handbook (Second Edition), published March 2026.  A trusted, practical...