Andrew Nevas appears before Connecticut Supreme Court regarding COVID rent dispute

December 3, 2021 Media Mentions

The pandemic has altered the landscape for businesses across the country, not only in the way in which they conduct business, but also their physical presence within the community. An industry that was especially affected by the pandemic was the restaurant industry.

While the restaurant industry suffered, building owners and landlords across the country were still required to make mortgage and utility payments to ensure their properties were not foreclosed upon. In many cases, landlords were forced to take legal action against their tenants due to failure to pay their rent.

On November 16, Andrew Nevas appeared in front of the Connecticut Supreme Court to argue such a case. Attorney Nevas’ client, AGW SoNo Partners, is a real estate manager and investor, owning commercial property in several locations, including Norwalk, Connecticut. The dispute is regarding a 10-year commercial lease between AGW SoNo Partners and Downtown Soho, LLC for a restaurant and bar in Norwalk.

In a trial earlier this year, AGW SoNo Partners sued Downtown Soho, LLC, for breach of contract and failure to make payments on their lease between March 2020 and September 2020. The Court awarded AGW SoNo Partners their seven months of missed lease payments and damages, totaling $200,308.

However, recently Downtown Soho, LLC, appealed the Courts decision arguing once again that Governor Lamont’s pandemic restrictions on restaurants made it virtually impossible for them to meet the requirements of their lease and that they should be freed from having to pay the back rent. Nevas argued that the Governor’s order did not absolve the restaurant from their obligations under their lease. “There was no impediment to actual performance here,” Nevas said. “They were open for six months without paying rent.”

In a recent Law360 Pulse article, Nevas said this case would set precedent for future cases and that he believed this case will be “the first time that the Supreme Court of any state in the country has addressed the issue of the impact that COVID has on the rights and responsibilities of commercial landlords and tenants.”

The Court is currently reviewing this and other matters from its most recent term.

Firm Highlights


Litigation Update: Jack Daniels V. Bad Spaniels. Is It Parody or Is It Trademark Infringement?

This week the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in the case, Jack Daniel’s Properties Inc. v. VIP Products LLC, U.S. Doc. No. 22-148, to decide the question: Can we do that? It’s been...


82 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2024, Including 10 Named Lawyers of the Year


Regina Hurley Urges Swift Action to Address Overwhelmed Probate & Family Court


Verrill Recognized Nationally for Health Care, Land Use and Zoning, Commercial Litigation, Real Estate, and Trust & Estates by Best Lawyers®


Successful Representation of Insurer before U.S. District Court for the District of Maine

Verrill successfully represented an insurer before the U.S. District Court for the District of Maine in an insurance coverage matter alleging that the insurer improperly denied a defense and indemnification to a landlord under...


Elections and Constitutional Law: Successfully Challenged Certification of Initiative Petition

In a victory for consumers and the ride-hailing public, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently barred the Secretary of State from placing on the November ballot initiative petitions proposed by companies such as Uber...


Daniel J. Dwyer Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Article


Say What You Mean, Mean What You Say…Gorelick v. Star Markets: A Study in Indemnity

Indemnity clauses in contracts are a valuable tool for allocating risk among the contracting parties, most often risk attendant to personal injury and property damage, and their effect can be far-reaching. Despite their significance...


Verrill Welcomes Victoria M. Cascarelli to Firm’s Litigation & Trial Group


No Longer a Walk in The Park - Entity Formation Under the Corporate Transparency Act (Updated)

Presently, forming a corporation, LLC or other entity in the U.S. can be done on a largely anonymous basis, without naming its owners and with only limited disclosures about managers, officers and directors. Under...

Contact Verrill at (855) 307 0700