March 24, 2022 - Alerts and Newsletters

        Federal Trademark Registration – Part 2

        Is your trademark registered? Should you register it? Why should you register it? What do you have to do? What does the process look like? Can you do it yourself or do you need to hire an attorney? These are just a few of the questions that business owners are faced with when considering whether and how to register their valuable trademarks. In this two-part overview of federal trademark registration, we answer these frequently asked questions. This part focuses on trademark prosecution. (Read part one: here).

        Overview of Trademark Prosecution

        Trademark prosecution — the process of seeing an application through to registration — generally involves four or five milestones. These milestones depend on what kind of application you file.

        In general, you need to be using the mark to secure a federal trademark registration. You do not, however, need to be using the mark to file an application. As such, there are two types of applications you can file with the USPTO: (1) a use-based application or (2) an intent-to-use (or “ITU”) application (There are other bases for applications, but these are outside of the scope of this article and generally will not apply to most U.S.-based businesses.). A use-based application is exactly what is sounds like — you are already using the mark in connection with the goods/services identified in the application. Conversely, an ITU application is based on your bona fide intent to use the mark in connection with the goods/services identified in the application — you have plans to use the mark in the relatively near future but want to get your application on file before doing so.

        The prosecution of use-based and intent-to-use applications vary slightly, and we review these differences below.

        With all of the above in mind, here are the general steps involved in prosecuting a U.S. trademark application.

        1. Clearance

        While not required, it is highly recommended to clear a trademark to determine whether the mark is available for use and registration in the U.S. This involves conducting a search of the USPTO databases for potentially conflicting applications and registrations and of the internet to see if there are any conflicting common law uses. Once the mark clears, you can proceed to filing the application.

        1. Filing the Application

        The next step is to file the application. The application lists (1) the trademark you wish to register; (2) the goods/services sold or to be sold under the trademark; and (3) the basis — use-based or intent-to-use — of the application. Once you have paid the required filing fees and the application is on file, it is assigned a filing date and a unique serial number.

        1. Examination

        Several months after the application is filed, the USPTO will assign an examining attorney to review the application to determine if it is eligible for registration. Examination includes a search for conflicting marks; a review of the written application, the mark drawing, and any documentation filed in support of the application; and a determination of whether all fees have been paid. If the examining attorney finds no issues with the application, they will approve it for publication. This is extremely rare. In most cases (around 80–90% of cases), the examining attorney will refuse registration on one or several grounds in the form of an Office Action. Once you overcome all of the issues in the Office Action, the examining attorney will approve the application for publication.

        1. Publication

        Next, marks are published for opposition. Publication entails a 30-day opposition period in which any third party can challenge the registration of a mark. If your application survives the publication period without incident or successfully overcomes or settles an opposition, your application will move to the next step.

        1. Notice of Allowance (ITU applications only)

        If you filed an intent-to-use application, the USPTO will issue a “Notice of Allowance.” The Notice effectively states that your application is ready for registration once you submit acceptable evidence of use of the mark. You have three years to submit evidence of use of the mark once the Notice issues. You are allotted five six-month extensions in which to put the mark into use.

        1. Registration

        Once your use-based application survives the opposition period or the evidence of use of your trademark is accepted after the Notice of Allowance issues, your mark will register. A registration certificate will issue assigning a registration date and a unique registration number.

        1. Maintenance

        After the registration issues, you must make periodic maintenance filings proving to the USPTO that you are still using the mark (declarations of continuous use) and renewing the registration (renewal applications).

        On paper, trademark prosecution is straight forward…

        But this is rarely the case.

        Seeing an application through to registration can be a complex, years-long endeavor. This is why trademark attorneys exist: to assist clients in navigating and understanding the complexities of trademark prosecution to make the appropriate strategic decisions for their businesses and trademark needs.

        Can you (and should you) apply to register the mark on your own?

        While you certainly can apply to register a trademark on your own, it is a potentially challenging prospect that may be best handled by an experienced attorney. The trademark attorneys at Verrill have years of experience advising clients on the availability of trademarks for use and registration and prosecuting applications before the USPTO. Contact us with any questions or to assist with your trademark matters.

        Associated People

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...