March 21, 2025 - Alerts and Newsletters

        It’s Official: All U.S. Entities Excluded from Filing Obligations Under the Corporate Transparency Act

        On March 21, 2025, FinCEN published an “interim final rule” (IFR) that makes sweeping changes in the reach of the Corporate Transparency Act. The IFR is immediately effective and eliminates all BOI report obligations for all domestic entities.

        Highlights:

        • US COMPANIES EXEMPT. Under the CTA, some companies (such as public companies, banks, large operating companies, etc.) were already exempted from the definition of a “reporting company.” The IFR now extends the exemption to all corporations, LLCs, and other entities formed under State or Tribal law.
          • Any US entity that has not yet filed its initial Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) report is now relieved of all obligations to file a BOI report.
          • Any US entity that previously did file a BOI report is now relieved of all obligations to update or correct any prior BOI report.
        • REGISTERED FOREIGN ENTITIES MUST STILL FILE. The BOI report obligation now remains in place only for foreign entities that register to do business in the US. As before, those entities still need to file BOI reports showing:
          • Specified information about the entity itself.
          • Specified information about each non-US beneficial owner – the term “beneficial owner” is limited to individuals and covers the following classes of people:
            • Each “senior officer” of the reporting company
            • Each other individual who, directly or indirectly, owns or controls 25% or more of the equity interests in the entity
            • Each other individual who, directly or indirectly, has substantial control over the entity (meaning the ability to exercise – either alone or with others – significant influence over important decisions of the company (most directors likely qualify)
          • HOWEVER, no information need be provided about any individual who is a US citizen or resident for US income tax purposes.
            • Specified identifying information about each company applicant – the term “company applicant” means the one or two individuals who made or supervised the registration filing (often a lawyer or paralegal) except that a foreign entity that first registered in the US before 2024 need not list its company applicants.
        • FINCEN ID NUMBER HOLDERS? The CTA allows an individual to obtain a FinCEN identifier number by filing his/her personal information directly with FinCEN. Doing so allows that individual to avoid having to give personal information (driver’s license, etc.) to the reporting company, and also shifts to the individual the obligation to keep that information current with FinCEN. The IFR made no change in the provision that imposes update obligations on those who obtain a FinCEN ID. FinCEN had earlier suggested it might develop an “off ramp” by which a person could terminate participation in the FinCEN ID program (and thus avoid a perpetual update requirement). The agency will now be under increased pressure to do so.

        It is interesting to note that in its original CTA rule (issued September 30, 2022), FinCEN had estimated that some 32.6 million entities would be subject to BOI filing requirements during 2024. A close reading of the release that accompanies the new IFR suggests that FinCEN now estimates that about 30,000 foreign entities were registered in 2024 and thus subject to BOI filing requirements. If so, then this is a 99.9% reduction in covered entities – dramatic indeed. The exclusion of US persons from the definition of beneficial owner of a foreign entity is a further narrowing of the original regulatory scheme.

        Several cases challenging the constitutionality of the Act are still pending, and it is foreseeable that other litigation could be filed to test whether Treasury has authority to make such sweeping changes. Other action (by rule or otherwise) could be forthcoming on what happens to the massive amount of relationship data already collected through FinCEN’s filing regime.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...