Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        HHS Issues Model Attestation Required by Final HIPAA Regulations Supporting Reproductive Health Care Privacy

        by Karen K. Hartford on August 1, 2024

        On April 26, 2024, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Office for Civil Rights (OCR) published Final Regulations under HIPAA’s Privacy Rule introducing greater protections for information related to reproductive health care. One aspect of the Final Regulations requires all covered entities, including self-insured group health plans and all business associates, to obtain, under certain circumstances, an attestation meeting specified content requirements from anyone seeking information potentially related to reproductive health care. HHS issued a Model Attestation at the end of July, and self-insured group health plans are urged to use it.

        The Final Regulations

        Generally, the Final Regulations limit uses and disclosures of Protected Health Information (PHI)[1] “potentially relating to reproductive health care” for certain non-healthcare purposes if the health care was legal under federal law or the law of the state in which the services were provided. The Regulations do not elaborate upon the meaning of “potentially related to,” but the language clearly requires a broad interpretation. “Reproductive health care” is defined by the Regulations to mean “health care . . . that affects the health of an individual in matters relating to the reproductive system and its functions and processes.” The Preamble to the Final Regulations includes a non-exhaustive list of services that constitute reproductive health care, including contraception, preconception screening and counseling, managing pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions, fertility and infertility diagnosis and treatment, the diagnosis and treatment of conditions affecting the reproductive system, and other types of care, services, and supplies used for diagnosing and treating conditions related to the reproductive system.

        The Final Regulations prohibit the use and disclosure of PHI for the following non-healthcare purposes:

        1. To conduct a criminal, civil, or administrative investigation into any person for the mere act of seeking, obtaining, providing, or facilitating reproductive health care, where such health care is lawful under the circumstances in which it was provided;
        2. To impose criminal, civil, or administrative liability on any person for the mere act of seeking, obtaining, providing, or facilitating reproductive health care, where such health care is lawful under the circumstances in which it was provided; and
        3. To identify any person for any purpose described in the above two prohibitions.

        Notably, the Regulations include a presumption that reproductive health care is lawful unless the covered entity has actual knowledge that it is not or receives information from the person requesting the use or disclosure that provides a substantial factual basis that the care was unlawful.

        The Attestation

        Under the Regulations, if a covered entity or business associate receives a request for PHI potentially related to reproductive health care, for health oversight activities, judicial and administrative proceedings, law enforcement purposes, or for the authorized duties and activities of coroners and medical examiners—all uses or disclosures which would otherwise be permitted under existing provisions of the HIPAA Privacy Rule—then the covered entity or business associate must obtain an attestation from the person or entity requesting the use or disclosure, meeting specific form and content requirements.

        Specifically, the Regulations require that the attestation be written in plain English. The attestation may be electronic, but an attestation will not be valid if it is combined with other documents or if it contains information not required under the Final Regulations.

        Additionally, pursuant to Regulation § 164.509(c)(1) the attestation must include the following content:

        1. A description of the information requested that identifies the information in a specific fashion, including one of the following: (a) the name of any individual(s) whose PHI is sought, if practicable; or if not practicable, (b) a description of the class of individuals whose PHI is sought.
        2. The name or other specific identification of the person(s) or class of persons who are requested to make the use or disclosure.
        3. The name or other specific identification of the person(s) or class of persons to whom the covered entity is to make the requested use or disclosure.
        4. A clear statement that the use or disclosure is not for one of the prohibited purposes described above.
        5. A statement that a person may be subject to criminal penalties pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1320d-6 if that person knowingly and in violation of HIPAA obtains individually identifiable health information relating to an individual or discloses individually identifiable health information to another person.
        6. The signature of the person requesting the protected health information which may be an electronic signature and date. If the attestation is signed by a representative of the person requesting the information, a description of such representative’s authority to act for the person must also be provided.

        The Model Attestation meets all of the requirements to be a valid attestation and sponsors of self-insured group health plans are encouraged to use it to avoid challenges to the attestation’s validity. Plan sponsors will need to educate their employees with access to PHI about the new rules, develop a process for collecting valid attestations, and review their current business associate agreements and policy and procedure materials to determine whether amendments are required.

        The Final Regulations include other changes and requirements that will have a broader impact on HIPAA administration, training, policies, and procedures including required updates to the Notice of Privacy Practices, which are beyond the scope of this post.

        The Final Regulations became effective on June 25, 2024. Except for the changes to the Notice of Privacy Practices, compliance is required by December 23, 2024. Updates to the Notice of Privacy Practices must be made no later than February 16, 2026.

        If you have questions about the Final Regulations or the requirements of the written attestation, please contact a member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] In general, PHI is any information about health status, provision of health care, or payment for health care that is created or collected by a covered entity, such as a self-insured group health plan, and that can be linked to a specific individual.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...
        Media Mentions

        Martha Gaythwaite Featured in Portland Press Herald Coverage of Sig Sauer Trial Victory

        Verrill attorney Martha Gaythwaite was highlighted in media coverage of a federal trial in Bangor involving firearm manufacturer Sig Sauer. As...