Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Revenue Procedure 2019-19: Enhancements to EPCRS are Great News for Plan Sponsors

        by Christopher S. Lockman on April 24, 2019

        Newly published Revenue Procedure 2019-19 modifies and supersedes prior IRS guidance regarding the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) to allow plan sponsors to self-correct an expanded number of problems that may affect retirement plan operations or documents. The new guidance, which took effect April 19, 2019, provides a significant opportunity for plan sponsors to correct loan defaults and other minor operational failures without going through the expensive and often time consuming voluntary correction program (VCP) procedure.

        Prior to Revenue Procedure 2019-19, plan sponsors were required to file a VCP application seeking IRS approval of a retroactive amendment unless the sponsor was amending the plan solely to allow for hardship distributions or loans. Under the new guidance, a plan sponsor may correct an operational failure by retroactive plan amendment without submitting a VCP application if three conditions are satisfied:

        (1) the amendment results in an increase of a benefit, right, or feature (such as the rate of matching contributions);
        (2) the increase is available to all eligible employees; and
        (3) the increase otherwise satisfies the general correction principles in the Revenue Procedure.

        The Revenue Procedure also allows plan sponsors to correct certain plan document failures (such as the failure to timely correct a disqualifying provision) without filing a VCP application. The expanded self-correction method is available if:

        (1) the plan has received a favorable determination or opinion letter;
        (2) the error is not the failure to timely adopt a qualified plan or a written 403(b) plan document; and
        (3) the correction occurs by the end of the second plan year following the year in which the plan document failure occurred (the self-correction period).

        Perhaps most helpful to a large number of employers, the new guidance expands the scope of loan failures that can be self-corrected. First, plan sponsors may now report a deemed distribution in the year of correction rather than in the year of the failure without submitting a VCP application. Second, plan sponsors may increase the number of loans available to a single participant by retroactive amendment so long as the amended plan would satisfy legal requirements and plan loans were available to all participants or participants who are non-highly compensated employees. Third, plan sponsors can self-correct the failure to obtain spousal consent prior to taking a plan loan.

        Finally, plan sponsors may now correct loan defaults – through single sum repayment, reamortization of the loan balance, or a combination of the two – without filing a VCP application. This is great news for plan sponsors. Under prior guidance, plan sponsors were required to seek IRS approval of any attempt to restructure a defaulted loan. Following the elimination of the reduced VCP fee for loan defaults, it could be very expensive for a plan sponsor to file a VCP application for the simple purpose of correcting a defaulted loan. In addition, because of the time necessary for the IRS to process a VCP application, plan sponsors were often in the difficult position of reamortizing a loan pending IRS approval to allow the loan recipient adequate time for repayment before the expiration of the maximum loan term. Now, however, plan sponsors can confidently move forward with implementing a loan default correction without waiting for IRS approval. Corrections for loans that exceed the statutory maximum amount or term, or that do not satisfy the level amortization requirement, must still be corrected through the VCP process or Audit Cap.

        The IRS has rightly concluded that an expansion of the self-correction process will promote voluntary compliance for retirement plans and reduce the costs and burdens of compliance on employers. And the IRS intends to offer examples on its website that will help plan sponsors identify significant versus insignificant operational failures, which may also expand the use of the self-correction procedure.

        Even the best run plans have to be corrected now and again. If you have questions about how to correct an operational or documentation failure affecting your retirement plan, contact an employee benefits attorney at Verrill.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...