Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Can I Require Employees to be Tested for COVID-19 Before Entering the Workplace?

        by Tawny L. Alvarez on April 24, 2020

        Yesterday, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) published guidance in response to this question and the agency’s answer was yes—“an employer may choose to administer COVID-19 testing to employees before they enter the workplace to determine if they have the virus.” (See Q. A.6). The EEOC noted that under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), “any mandatory medical test of employees” must be “job related and consistent with business necessity,” and when that standard is applied under the current COVID-19 pandemic, “employers may take steps to determine if employees entering the workplace have COVID-19 because an individual with the virus will pose a direct threat to the health of others.”

        The EEOC did provide the following caveats to the guidance:

        • Ensure the tests are accurate and reliable – in doing so, review guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other public health authorities concerning safe and accurate testing
        • Consider the statistics as to false positives and false negatives associated with the test the organization uses
        • Be mindful that accurate testing only reveals the virus is (or is not) currently present
        • Employers should continue to require employees to observe infection control practices in the workplace to prevent transmission

        Unsurprisingly, I’m going to provide a few more caveats. While the EEOC has noted that an organization can do it, and it should be mindful of the caveats set forth above, there’s always the question of should an organization do it. Here are some other things to keep in mind before testing:

        • Does the company have the resources to test every employee on every day that the employee works for the foreseeable future? If not, how will the company determine which employees are tested and how often? If employees are only being tested weekly, what steps is the organization taking to continue to be mindful of symptoms in employees? Does such limited testing providing value to the organization?
        • Once the organization collects the data, where is the organization storing it and how is the employee privacy maintained? Organizations should be storing all medical information related to testing in the employee’s existing medical files (this includes employee’s statements concerning symptoms/test results, employer notes and other documentation with health care providers concerning diagnosis or symptoms).
        • When performing the test, ensure employee privacy. If the tests are done in public spaces and an employee is turned away from work following the test, employees will likely presume that the employee has tested positive—thus revealing confidential health information to co-workers. For further discussion of this topic, see Verrill’s earlier post regarding temperature checks available here.
        • How will the organization respond if an employee (or group of employees) refuse to submit to testing? Is the organization prepared to terminate all of those individuals?
        • Does the organization have a Collective Bargaining Agreement? Does it permit testing or is it silent?
        • How will the organization deal with the time employees are waiting to be tested or having the test administered? This time may be compensable time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and/or state wage and hour statutes.
        • Recall that while the EEOC oversees Title VII and the ADA, state fair employment practices agency (FEPA) may have stricter rules and not permit this type of testing. Before the management team makes a decision as to whether testing works for the organization, research the issue or consult counsel.

        While the EEOC’s guidance is helpful in understanding the agency’s position on the matter, courts are not bound by the determination and there are still risks associated with the practice. Weighing those risks with the benefits of testing is going to be organization specific. For more information on this topic, contact Tawny Alvarez or a member of Verrill’s Employment & Labor Group.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...
        Media Mentions

        Martha Gaythwaite Featured in Portland Press Herald Coverage of Sig Sauer Trial Victory

        Verrill attorney Martha Gaythwaite was highlighted in media coverage of a federal trial in Bangor involving firearm manufacturer Sig Sauer. As...
        Media Mentions

        Law360 Quotes Robert Keach on Senate Bill Affecting Small Business Restructurings

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article discussing federal legislation that would permanently restore the $7.5 million...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SAFEs and Preferred Stock – Key Deal Terms Every Founder Should Know

        SAFEs Before negotiating a term sheet for preferred stock, many early-stage companies, particularly at the seed stage, first raise capital through...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Business Restructuring and Insolvency Attorney Nimra Tariq

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Nimra Tariq has joined the firm’s Business Restructuring and Insolvency Group as an...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Provides Commentary on First Brands Restructuring in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was quoted in the Law360 article, "First Brands' Ch. 11 Plan Revives Angst Over Admin Claims," discussing First Brands...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Construction Attorney Cassie Dufon

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to welcome Cassie Dufon to the firm’s Construction Group as an Associate, resident in the firm’s Portland...
        Press Releases

        Verrill’s Wide-Ranging Private Wealth Law Practice Recognized in 2026 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide

        BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine and BOSTON, Mass. – Verrill attorneys Kenneth P. Brier, Anya F. Endsley, Kurt E. Klebe, Mary McQuillen, Nathaniel S....
        Blog

        Update on Status of Maine Packaging EPR

        In December 2024, Verrill published a blog post, Unwrapping Maine's Gift to the Environment: A New Packaging Stewardship Program Set to Launch in...