Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Can I Require Employees to be Tested for COVID-19 Before Entering the Workplace?

        by Tawny L. Alvarez on April 24, 2020

        Yesterday, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) published guidance in response to this question and the agency’s answer was yes—“an employer may choose to administer COVID-19 testing to employees before they enter the workplace to determine if they have the virus.” (See Q. A.6). The EEOC noted that under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), “any mandatory medical test of employees” must be “job related and consistent with business necessity,” and when that standard is applied under the current COVID-19 pandemic, “employers may take steps to determine if employees entering the workplace have COVID-19 because an individual with the virus will pose a direct threat to the health of others.”

        The EEOC did provide the following caveats to the guidance:

        • Ensure the tests are accurate and reliable – in doing so, review guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other public health authorities concerning safe and accurate testing
        • Consider the statistics as to false positives and false negatives associated with the test the organization uses
        • Be mindful that accurate testing only reveals the virus is (or is not) currently present
        • Employers should continue to require employees to observe infection control practices in the workplace to prevent transmission

        Unsurprisingly, I’m going to provide a few more caveats. While the EEOC has noted that an organization can do it, and it should be mindful of the caveats set forth above, there’s always the question of should an organization do it. Here are some other things to keep in mind before testing:

        • Does the company have the resources to test every employee on every day that the employee works for the foreseeable future? If not, how will the company determine which employees are tested and how often? If employees are only being tested weekly, what steps is the organization taking to continue to be mindful of symptoms in employees? Does such limited testing providing value to the organization?
        • Once the organization collects the data, where is the organization storing it and how is the employee privacy maintained? Organizations should be storing all medical information related to testing in the employee’s existing medical files (this includes employee’s statements concerning symptoms/test results, employer notes and other documentation with health care providers concerning diagnosis or symptoms).
        • When performing the test, ensure employee privacy. If the tests are done in public spaces and an employee is turned away from work following the test, employees will likely presume that the employee has tested positive—thus revealing confidential health information to co-workers. For further discussion of this topic, see Verrill’s earlier post regarding temperature checks available here.
        • How will the organization respond if an employee (or group of employees) refuse to submit to testing? Is the organization prepared to terminate all of those individuals?
        • Does the organization have a Collective Bargaining Agreement? Does it permit testing or is it silent?
        • How will the organization deal with the time employees are waiting to be tested or having the test administered? This time may be compensable time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and/or state wage and hour statutes.
        • Recall that while the EEOC oversees Title VII and the ADA, state fair employment practices agency (FEPA) may have stricter rules and not permit this type of testing. Before the management team makes a decision as to whether testing works for the organization, research the issue or consult counsel.

        While the EEOC’s guidance is helpful in understanding the agency’s position on the matter, courts are not bound by the determination and there are still risks associated with the practice. Weighing those risks with the benefits of testing is going to be organization specific. For more information on this topic, contact Tawny Alvarez or a member of Verrill’s Employment & Labor Group.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...