Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Can I Require Employees to be Tested for COVID-19 Before Entering the Workplace?

        by Tawny L. Alvarez on April 24, 2020

        Yesterday, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) published guidance in response to this question and the agency’s answer was yes—“an employer may choose to administer COVID-19 testing to employees before they enter the workplace to determine if they have the virus.” (See Q. A.6). The EEOC noted that under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), “any mandatory medical test of employees” must be “job related and consistent with business necessity,” and when that standard is applied under the current COVID-19 pandemic, “employers may take steps to determine if employees entering the workplace have COVID-19 because an individual with the virus will pose a direct threat to the health of others.”

        The EEOC did provide the following caveats to the guidance:

        • Ensure the tests are accurate and reliable – in doing so, review guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and other public health authorities concerning safe and accurate testing
        • Consider the statistics as to false positives and false negatives associated with the test the organization uses
        • Be mindful that accurate testing only reveals the virus is (or is not) currently present
        • Employers should continue to require employees to observe infection control practices in the workplace to prevent transmission

        Unsurprisingly, I’m going to provide a few more caveats. While the EEOC has noted that an organization can do it, and it should be mindful of the caveats set forth above, there’s always the question of should an organization do it. Here are some other things to keep in mind before testing:

        • Does the company have the resources to test every employee on every day that the employee works for the foreseeable future? If not, how will the company determine which employees are tested and how often? If employees are only being tested weekly, what steps is the organization taking to continue to be mindful of symptoms in employees? Does such limited testing providing value to the organization?
        • Once the organization collects the data, where is the organization storing it and how is the employee privacy maintained? Organizations should be storing all medical information related to testing in the employee’s existing medical files (this includes employee’s statements concerning symptoms/test results, employer notes and other documentation with health care providers concerning diagnosis or symptoms).
        • When performing the test, ensure employee privacy. If the tests are done in public spaces and an employee is turned away from work following the test, employees will likely presume that the employee has tested positive—thus revealing confidential health information to co-workers. For further discussion of this topic, see Verrill’s earlier post regarding temperature checks available here.
        • How will the organization respond if an employee (or group of employees) refuse to submit to testing? Is the organization prepared to terminate all of those individuals?
        • Does the organization have a Collective Bargaining Agreement? Does it permit testing or is it silent?
        • How will the organization deal with the time employees are waiting to be tested or having the test administered? This time may be compensable time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and/or state wage and hour statutes.
        • Recall that while the EEOC oversees Title VII and the ADA, state fair employment practices agency (FEPA) may have stricter rules and not permit this type of testing. Before the management team makes a decision as to whether testing works for the organization, research the issue or consult counsel.

        While the EEOC’s guidance is helpful in understanding the agency’s position on the matter, courts are not bound by the determination and there are still risks associated with the practice. Weighing those risks with the benefits of testing is going to be organization specific. For more information on this topic, contact Tawny Alvarez or a member of Verrill’s Employment & Labor Group.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...