Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        DOL Announces Temporary Enforcement Policy Regarding Transfer of Small Retirement Benefit Payments of Missing Participants to State Unclaimed Property Funds

        January 31, 2025

        Retirement plan fiduciaries have a new option for handling small benefit payments owed to missing participants and beneficiaries thanks to a temporary enforcement policy announced by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) earlier this month in DOL Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2025-1 (“FAB 2025-1”).[1]

        The Policy

        Under the policy, and pending further guidance, the DOL will not assert a violation of fiduciary duties under Section 404(a) of ERISA in connection with a plan fiduciary’s decision to transfer retirement benefit payments (including uncashed checks) owed to a missing participant or beneficiary[2] from an ongoing retirement plan to a state unclaimed property fund, if the following conditions are met:

        • The present value of the participant’s or beneficiary’s vested benefit (including rollover contributions but disregarding any outstanding loan balance) does not exceed $1,000;
        • The plan fiduciary determines that the transfer to a state unclaimed property fund is a prudent destination for the participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit payments;
        • The plan fiduciary has implemented a prudent program to find missing participants consistent with the DOL’s Missing Participants—Best Practices for Pension Plans and nevertheless has been unable to find the participant or beneficiary;
        • The transfer is made to the unclaimed property fund of the state of the participant’s or beneficiary’s last known address;
        • The state unclaimed property fund qualifies as an “eligible state fund;” and
        • The summary plan description of the plan discloses that a missing participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit payments may be transferred to an eligible state fund and identifies the name, address, and phone number of a plan contact for further information regarding the eligible state funds to which retirement benefit payments are transferred.

        What is an Eligible State Fund?

        To be an “eligible state fund,” the state unclaimed property fund must satisfy nine requirements set forth in FAB 2025-1. Chief among them, the fund:

        • May not charge any fees;
        • Must permit claims to be made and paid in perpetuity;
        • Must maintain a searchable website that reliably shows, at no charge, the name of the missing participant or beneficiary and the name of the plan in the results page of a search and must permit an electronic claims process; and
        • Must participate in the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators MissingMoney.com website or similar non-commercial unclaimed property database endorsed by the National Association of State Treasurers, Inc.

        Helpfully, FAB 2025-1 provides that absent actual knowledge to the contrary, a plan fiduciary may rely on a representation by a State Treasurer that the state operates an unclaimed property fund that meets all nine requirements.

        What Else in FAB 2025-1 is Noteworthy?

        Two other items in FAB 2025-1 are noteworthy. First, it states that the DOL is not precluded from asserting violations under ERISA Sections 107, 209, and 404 for failure to maintain records. Second, it states that it does not address federal income tax withholding obligations with respect to transferred amounts. In our view, retirement plans should withhold and remit federal income tax on transferred amounts in accordance with Section 3405 of the Internal Revenue Code until the IRS indicates otherwise.

        Lastly, FAB 2025-1 includes an informative “Background” section summarizing the Department’s past guidance and initiatives regarding missing participants, particularly voluntary transfers of missing participants’ and beneficiaries’ retirement benefit payments to a state unclaimed property fund.

        Takeaways from FAB 2025-1

        1. The DOL’s enforcement policy gives retirement plan fiduciaries another option to consider, which they may find preferable to transferring a missing participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit to an IRA because, unlike an IRA, there are no fees that could erode the retirement benefit.
        2. Plan fiduciaries intending to make transfers pursuant to the enforcement policy will want to confirm that the plan’s missing participant processes align with the DOL’s Missing Participants—Best Practices for Pension Plans because the policy essentially turns that best practices guidance into a requirement.
        3. These plan fiduciaries will also want to ensure that the plan’s SPD has been updated as required by the enforcement policy, and plan sponsors should consider whether the distribution provisions in the plan document need to be amended to permit transfers pursuant to the enforcement policy.
        4. The enforcement policy is temporary. The DOL intends to consider more formal guidance related to voluntary transfers of retirement benefit payments from ongoing plans to state unclaimed property funds as part of its implementation of the SECURE 2.0 Act mandate to establish an online searchable Retirement Savings Lost and Found database.

        If you have any questions regarding the DOL’s temporary enforcement policy or FAB 2025-1 generally, please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] The DOL’s “temporary enforcement policy” is a bit of a misnomer because it is actually a non-enforcement policy.

        [2] FAB 2025-1 uses the term “missing” to also refer to participants and beneficiaries who are nonresponsive.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...