Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        DOL Announces Temporary Enforcement Policy Regarding Transfer of Small Retirement Benefit Payments of Missing Participants to State Unclaimed Property Funds

        January 31, 2025

        Retirement plan fiduciaries have a new option for handling small benefit payments owed to missing participants and beneficiaries thanks to a temporary enforcement policy announced by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) earlier this month in DOL Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2025-1 (“FAB 2025-1”).[1]

        The Policy

        Under the policy, and pending further guidance, the DOL will not assert a violation of fiduciary duties under Section 404(a) of ERISA in connection with a plan fiduciary’s decision to transfer retirement benefit payments (including uncashed checks) owed to a missing participant or beneficiary[2] from an ongoing retirement plan to a state unclaimed property fund, if the following conditions are met:

        • The present value of the participant’s or beneficiary’s vested benefit (including rollover contributions but disregarding any outstanding loan balance) does not exceed $1,000;
        • The plan fiduciary determines that the transfer to a state unclaimed property fund is a prudent destination for the participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit payments;
        • The plan fiduciary has implemented a prudent program to find missing participants consistent with the DOL’s Missing Participants—Best Practices for Pension Plans and nevertheless has been unable to find the participant or beneficiary;
        • The transfer is made to the unclaimed property fund of the state of the participant’s or beneficiary’s last known address;
        • The state unclaimed property fund qualifies as an “eligible state fund;” and
        • The summary plan description of the plan discloses that a missing participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit payments may be transferred to an eligible state fund and identifies the name, address, and phone number of a plan contact for further information regarding the eligible state funds to which retirement benefit payments are transferred.

        What is an Eligible State Fund?

        To be an “eligible state fund,” the state unclaimed property fund must satisfy nine requirements set forth in FAB 2025-1. Chief among them, the fund:

        • May not charge any fees;
        • Must permit claims to be made and paid in perpetuity;
        • Must maintain a searchable website that reliably shows, at no charge, the name of the missing participant or beneficiary and the name of the plan in the results page of a search and must permit an electronic claims process; and
        • Must participate in the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators MissingMoney.com website or similar non-commercial unclaimed property database endorsed by the National Association of State Treasurers, Inc.

        Helpfully, FAB 2025-1 provides that absent actual knowledge to the contrary, a plan fiduciary may rely on a representation by a State Treasurer that the state operates an unclaimed property fund that meets all nine requirements.

        What Else in FAB 2025-1 is Noteworthy?

        Two other items in FAB 2025-1 are noteworthy. First, it states that the DOL is not precluded from asserting violations under ERISA Sections 107, 209, and 404 for failure to maintain records. Second, it states that it does not address federal income tax withholding obligations with respect to transferred amounts. In our view, retirement plans should withhold and remit federal income tax on transferred amounts in accordance with Section 3405 of the Internal Revenue Code until the IRS indicates otherwise.

        Lastly, FAB 2025-1 includes an informative “Background” section summarizing the Department’s past guidance and initiatives regarding missing participants, particularly voluntary transfers of missing participants’ and beneficiaries’ retirement benefit payments to a state unclaimed property fund.

        Takeaways from FAB 2025-1

        1. The DOL’s enforcement policy gives retirement plan fiduciaries another option to consider, which they may find preferable to transferring a missing participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit to an IRA because, unlike an IRA, there are no fees that could erode the retirement benefit.
        2. Plan fiduciaries intending to make transfers pursuant to the enforcement policy will want to confirm that the plan’s missing participant processes align with the DOL’s Missing Participants—Best Practices for Pension Plans because the policy essentially turns that best practices guidance into a requirement.
        3. These plan fiduciaries will also want to ensure that the plan’s SPD has been updated as required by the enforcement policy, and plan sponsors should consider whether the distribution provisions in the plan document need to be amended to permit transfers pursuant to the enforcement policy.
        4. The enforcement policy is temporary. The DOL intends to consider more formal guidance related to voluntary transfers of retirement benefit payments from ongoing plans to state unclaimed property funds as part of its implementation of the SECURE 2.0 Act mandate to establish an online searchable Retirement Savings Lost and Found database.

        If you have any questions regarding the DOL’s temporary enforcement policy or FAB 2025-1 generally, please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] The DOL’s “temporary enforcement policy” is a bit of a misnomer because it is actually a non-enforcement policy.

        [2] FAB 2025-1 uses the term “missing” to also refer to participants and beneficiaries who are nonresponsive.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...