Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        DOL Announces Temporary Enforcement Policy Regarding Transfer of Small Retirement Benefit Payments of Missing Participants to State Unclaimed Property Funds

        January 31, 2025

        Retirement plan fiduciaries have a new option for handling small benefit payments owed to missing participants and beneficiaries thanks to a temporary enforcement policy announced by the Department of Labor (“DOL”) earlier this month in DOL Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2025-1 (“FAB 2025-1”).[1]

        The Policy

        Under the policy, and pending further guidance, the DOL will not assert a violation of fiduciary duties under Section 404(a) of ERISA in connection with a plan fiduciary’s decision to transfer retirement benefit payments (including uncashed checks) owed to a missing participant or beneficiary[2] from an ongoing retirement plan to a state unclaimed property fund, if the following conditions are met:

        • The present value of the participant’s or beneficiary’s vested benefit (including rollover contributions but disregarding any outstanding loan balance) does not exceed $1,000;
        • The plan fiduciary determines that the transfer to a state unclaimed property fund is a prudent destination for the participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit payments;
        • The plan fiduciary has implemented a prudent program to find missing participants consistent with the DOL’s Missing Participants—Best Practices for Pension Plans and nevertheless has been unable to find the participant or beneficiary;
        • The transfer is made to the unclaimed property fund of the state of the participant’s or beneficiary’s last known address;
        • The state unclaimed property fund qualifies as an “eligible state fund;” and
        • The summary plan description of the plan discloses that a missing participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit payments may be transferred to an eligible state fund and identifies the name, address, and phone number of a plan contact for further information regarding the eligible state funds to which retirement benefit payments are transferred.

        What is an Eligible State Fund?

        To be an “eligible state fund,” the state unclaimed property fund must satisfy nine requirements set forth in FAB 2025-1. Chief among them, the fund:

        • May not charge any fees;
        • Must permit claims to be made and paid in perpetuity;
        • Must maintain a searchable website that reliably shows, at no charge, the name of the missing participant or beneficiary and the name of the plan in the results page of a search and must permit an electronic claims process; and
        • Must participate in the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators MissingMoney.com website or similar non-commercial unclaimed property database endorsed by the National Association of State Treasurers, Inc.

        Helpfully, FAB 2025-1 provides that absent actual knowledge to the contrary, a plan fiduciary may rely on a representation by a State Treasurer that the state operates an unclaimed property fund that meets all nine requirements.

        What Else in FAB 2025-1 is Noteworthy?

        Two other items in FAB 2025-1 are noteworthy. First, it states that the DOL is not precluded from asserting violations under ERISA Sections 107, 209, and 404 for failure to maintain records. Second, it states that it does not address federal income tax withholding obligations with respect to transferred amounts. In our view, retirement plans should withhold and remit federal income tax on transferred amounts in accordance with Section 3405 of the Internal Revenue Code until the IRS indicates otherwise.

        Lastly, FAB 2025-1 includes an informative “Background” section summarizing the Department’s past guidance and initiatives regarding missing participants, particularly voluntary transfers of missing participants’ and beneficiaries’ retirement benefit payments to a state unclaimed property fund.

        Takeaways from FAB 2025-1

        1. The DOL’s enforcement policy gives retirement plan fiduciaries another option to consider, which they may find preferable to transferring a missing participant’s or beneficiary’s retirement benefit to an IRA because, unlike an IRA, there are no fees that could erode the retirement benefit.
        2. Plan fiduciaries intending to make transfers pursuant to the enforcement policy will want to confirm that the plan’s missing participant processes align with the DOL’s Missing Participants—Best Practices for Pension Plans because the policy essentially turns that best practices guidance into a requirement.
        3. These plan fiduciaries will also want to ensure that the plan’s SPD has been updated as required by the enforcement policy, and plan sponsors should consider whether the distribution provisions in the plan document need to be amended to permit transfers pursuant to the enforcement policy.
        4. The enforcement policy is temporary. The DOL intends to consider more formal guidance related to voluntary transfers of retirement benefit payments from ongoing plans to state unclaimed property funds as part of its implementation of the SECURE 2.0 Act mandate to establish an online searchable Retirement Savings Lost and Found database.

        If you have any questions regarding the DOL’s temporary enforcement policy or FAB 2025-1 generally, please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] The DOL’s “temporary enforcement policy” is a bit of a misnomer because it is actually a non-enforcement policy.

        [2] FAB 2025-1 uses the term “missing” to also refer to participants and beneficiaries who are nonresponsive.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        Working 9 to 5? It’s a Way to Make a Livin’, so Make Sure You’re Payin’ for Every Minute: A Maine Employer’s Guide to Stacked Wage & Hour Rules

        Four decades after Dolly Parton gave us both the namesake anthem of the American workday and the film about three fed-up office workers’ dreams of...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Can AI Pass the Doctor Test? FDA Considers Physician-Inspired Evaluation of GenAI Devices and Other Regulatory Measures

        AI is entering healthcare with indomitable will. It promises to increase efficiency, reduce administrative burden (which healthcare providers so...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Attorney Annabel Rodriguez Named Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez has been recognized as a Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, and will be...
        Blog

        What Employee Benefits Lawyers Do (and How to Make the Best Use of Us)

        What do employee benefits lawyers do all day and how can clients make the best use of them? This post offers an overview of the kinds of things...
        Media Mentions

        Bloomberg Law Quotes Robert Keach on Expanded Access to Small Business Reorganization

        Verrill attorney Bob Keach was recently featured in Bloomberg Law, discussing legislation that would raise debt limits for bankruptcy relief and...
        Blog

        Phil Bartlett to Step Down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission

        On September 15, 2026, Governor Janet Mills announced that Phil Bartlett will step down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC)...
        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...