Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        ERISA and COBRA Implications for EAPs and Wellness Programs

        by Kimberly S. Couch on September 28, 2020

        There is a growing trend for employers to provide employee assistance programs (“EAPs”) and wellness programs for the benefit of their employees. Typically, the employer pays for benefits under these programs out of its general assets. These programs are designed to reduce health care costs, reduce absences from work, and increase productivity by improving the physical and mental health of employees and helping them with life issues such as substance abuse, depression, finances, and child care. Although the programs may appear simple, employers should be aware that EAP and wellness programs may be (i) welfare benefit plans subject to ERISA and (ii) health plans subject to COBRA.

        ERISA Requirements

        Under ERISA, an “employee welfare benefit plan” is a plan or program maintained by an employer that provides medical, surgical, or hospital care or benefits, or benefits in the event of sickness or accidents to participants. An employee welfare benefit plan is subject to ERISA’s fiduciary rules, claims procedures, and plan document requirements (including the requirement to provide participants with a summary plan description), and may be required to file an annual return (Form 5500).

        Application to EAPs. An EAP that only provides referral services to therapists, counselors, or other medical providers does not provide medical care or benefits in the event of sickness and is not considered a welfare benefit plan under ERISA. In contrast, if the EAP is staffed by trained counselors and provides counseling sessions for mental health or substance abuse, the EAP provides medical care and/or benefits in the event of sickness and is subject to ERISA. An EAP may provide both ERISA medical benefits and other benefits that are not subject to ERISA (e.g., financial counseling). Some employers treat the entire EAP as subject to ERISA, while others may describe all benefits in the EAP summary plan description, but include disclaimers in the ERISA rights and claims procedures provisions for non-ERISA benefits.

        Application to Wellness Programs. If an employer offers only discount gym memberships and free seminars on exercise and nutrition, the employer’s wellness program does not provide medical care or benefits in the event of sickness and is not subject to ERISA. In contrast, if the employer’s wellness program provides physical exams, biometric screenings, health questionnaires with feedback or counseling, or similar benefits, the wellness program provides medical care and is subject to ERISA.

        COBRA Requirements

        Under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code, a plan sponsor must offer COBRA continuation health coverage to any qualified beneficiary that loses coverage under a “group health plan” because of a qualifying event, such as termination of employment. For purposes of COBRA, a group health plan is a plan maintained by an employer to provide health care to employees and former employees and their families through insured or self-insured arrangements. The term “health care” generally includes the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, and any other undertaking for purposes of affecting the structure or function of the body.

        Application to EAPs. If an EAP maintained by an employer provides only referral services, then it does not provide health care and is not a health plan for purposes of COBRA. In contrast, if the EAP provides health care (e.g., substance abuse or mental health counseling), it must provide COBRA continuation coverage to employees and dependents (qualified beneficiaries) that lose health care coverage under the EAP due to a qualifying event. As a technical matter, COBRA must be offered only for the portion of the EAP that provides health benefits; an employer need not offer extended coverage for legal services or financial counseling. However, it may be difficult to carve out non-health benefit services for EAP continuation coverage and COBRA premiums.

        If the EAP provides health care and is available only to employees (and dependents) that are enrolled in the health plan, the EAP is part of the health plan and the employer may issue a single COBRA notice for the health plan and the EAP when a qualifying event occurs. A qualified beneficiary may elect COBRA under the EAP only if he or she elects COBRA under the health plan and he or she will pay a single COBRA premium to continue both benefits. In contrast, if the EAP provides health care and is a separate plan (employees may elect EAP benefits without participating in the health plan), COBRA administration is more complex. A qualified beneficiary must be able to make a separate COBRA election for health care under the EAP and pay a separate COBRA premium for EAP continuation coverage.

        Neither the IRS nor the Department of Labor (“DOL”) has issued official guidance on how to determine the COBRA premium for an EAP. An employer could charge 102% of its cost to cover the individual in the EAP (typically EAPs charge a fee per covered individual), although it may be appropriate to carve out non-health care benefits from the COBRA premium. Alternatively, since EAP fees tend to be very low (e.g., $1 per employee per month), the employer could offer the EAP to qualified beneficiaries free of charge for the COBRA continuation period (18 months, 29 months, or 36 months depending on the qualifying event). The qualified beneficiaries would still receive a COBRA notice, but the notice would state that the employer was subsidizing the COBRA continuation coverage. It may be less costly for an employer to provide free COBRA continuation coverage than to administer COBRA premiums.

        An employer may streamline COBRA requirements by making the EAP available only to employees who participate in its health plan. However, this approach may deprive some employees of EAP benefits, and the employer would still need to make EAP health benefits available to qualified beneficiaries who elect COBRA under the health plan.

        Application to Wellness Programs. Wellness programs that offer only gym discounts and educational programs are not health plans subject to COBRA. In contrast, wellness programs that offer health care (screening, counseling, flu shots, physicals, or health-related contingent reward programs) are health plans subject to COBRA.

        If the wellness program provides health care and is offered only to employees that enroll in the employer’s health plan, the wellness program is treated as part of the health plan and the employer may issue a single COBRA notice for the health plan and wellness program when a qualifying event occurs. A qualified beneficiary will make a single election and pay a single premium for COBRA coverage. In contrast, if the wellness program provides health care and is a separate health plan (offered to employees regardless of their participation in the health plan), then qualified beneficiaries who lose coverage due to a qualifying event must be offered separate COBRA coverage under the wellness program and pay a separate COBRA premium.

        COBRA continuation coverage for wellness programs that offer on-site benefits presents special challenges. On-site facilities that further general health (e.g., a gym) or provide first aid for injuries incurred during working hours are exempt from COBRA. In contrast, an on-site program for screenings, flu shots, or counseling would be subject to COBRA. An employer, however, may not want former employees returning for on-site benefits. Because COBRA generally does not provide a right to treatment at a specified location, an employer may arrange for benefits that are provided on-site to be available to COBRA beneficiaries at a separate location (e.g., a clinic or drug store). Alternatively, the vendor for the wellness program may be willing to make the wellness program directly available to former employees.

        Neither the IRS nor the DOL has issued guidance on how to determine the COBRA premium for wellness programs. If an employer pays a fee for each covered employee, the employer should be able to charge a COBRA premium equal to 102% of the fee. If the cost to the employer ranges based on the programs elected by the employees, however, it will be more difficult to determine the COBRA premium. Since wellness programs typically cost more per employee than EAPs, it may not make sense for an employer to offer free COBRA continuation coverage. As a practical matter, it is unlikely that many qualified beneficiaries will elect COBRA continuation coverage if they are required to pay 102% of the cost of the wellness program.

        Other Laws

        Although it is beyond the scope of this blog post, employers should be aware that EAPs and wellness programs that qualify as health plans under ERISA and COBRA may be subject to other laws governing health plans. These include HIPAA privacy and security rules, the HIPAA nondiscrimination rules, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008. Employers should review their plans and consult with legal counsel to ensure compliance with these laws.

        Please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have any questions regarding the application of ERISA or COBRA to your EAP or wellness program.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...
        Media Mentions

        Martha Gaythwaite Featured in Portland Press Herald Coverage of Sig Sauer Trial Victory

        Verrill attorney Martha Gaythwaite was highlighted in media coverage of a federal trial in Bangor involving firearm manufacturer Sig Sauer. As...
        Media Mentions

        Law360 Quotes Robert Keach on Senate Bill Affecting Small Business Restructurings

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article discussing federal legislation that would permanently restore the $7.5 million...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SAFEs and Preferred Stock – Key Deal Terms Every Founder Should Know

        SAFEs Before negotiating a term sheet for preferred stock, many early-stage companies, particularly at the seed stage, first raise capital through...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Business Restructuring and Insolvency Attorney Nimra Tariq

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Nimra Tariq has joined the firm’s Business Restructuring and Insolvency Group as an...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Provides Commentary on First Brands Restructuring in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was quoted in the Law360 article, "First Brands' Ch. 11 Plan Revives Angst Over Admin Claims," discussing First Brands...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Construction Attorney Cassie Dufon

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to welcome Cassie Dufon to the firm’s Construction Group as an Associate, resident in the firm’s Portland...
        Press Releases

        Verrill’s Wide-Ranging Private Wealth Law Practice Recognized in 2026 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide

        BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine and BOSTON, Mass. – Verrill attorneys Kenneth P. Brier, Anya F. Endsley, Kurt E. Klebe, Mary McQuillen, Nathaniel S....
        Blog

        Update on Status of Maine Packaging EPR

        In December 2024, Verrill published a blog post, Unwrapping Maine's Gift to the Environment: A New Packaging Stewardship Program Set to Launch in...