Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Flu Season is Coming, but Can I Require My Employees to Vaccinate?

        by Tawny L. Alvarez on October 5, 2020

        As flu season approaches, employers are searching for answers on how to deal with viruses spreading throughout the workplace. The question is, “Can I mandate employees receive the flu vaccine?” Are there standards in place? How does COVID-19 come into play? Some concerns to be mindful of and risks associated with the behavior are as follows:

        • Claims of Violation of Privacy – Check if your state has a state-law right to privacy in the workplace. Maine does not have a statute that provides employees with statutory privacy protections, but other states do, and as an employer you are going to want to check each of the states in which the organization currently has employees to determine the breadth of those statutes and whether they would restrict this type of behavior.
        • EEOC Guidance for Title VII/ADA – In the EEOC guidance for pandemic preparation, it notes that “An employee may be entitled to an exemption from a mandatory vaccination requirement based on an Americans with Disabilities (ADA) disability that prevents him from taking the influenza vaccine. This would be a reasonable accommodation barring undue hardship (significant difficulty or expense). Similarly, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, once an employer receives notice that an employee’s sincerely held religious belief, practice, or observance prevents him from taking the influenza vaccine, the employer must provide a reasonable accommodation unless it would pose an undue hardship as defined by Title VII (“more than de minimis cost” to the operation of the employer’s business, which is a lower standard than under the ADA). Generally, ADA-covered employers should consider simply encouraging employees to get the influenza vaccine, rather than requiring them to take it. Employers in the healthcare industry, however, may believe that failure to obtain the vaccine could adversely affect the safety and health of patients. While the above analysis continues to apply, employers in the health-care industry likely have a stronger argument that they cannot accommodate the requested accommodation. In all cases, however, a case-by-case analysis will need to occur. *As of the date this document is being issued, there is no vaccine available for COVID-19. The EEOC has provided guidance on requiring a vaccine during a pandemic. This guidance, however, is regarding only a pandemic and accordingly would be applicable to a COVID-19 vaccine, and not the flu vaccine.
        • General ADA/MHRA Disability Standard – Under the ADA and MHRA (Maine Human Rights Act), an argument can be made that a required vaccine would be a medical examination/testing of a current employee. Under the ADA, in order to have a medical examination of a current employee, you must show the examination is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Courts have held that “job-related and consistent with business necessity is when an employer reasonably believes, based on objective evidence, that either: an employee’s ability to perform essential job functions is impaired by a medical condition; or an employee poses a direct threat due to a medical condition.” Here, the normal seasonal flu does not meet the standard of direct threat (which COVID-19 does as set forth by the EEOC), so you would have to show that an employee’s ability to perform the essential job functions are at issue. This normally only applies to individuals who are in the health care industry who may be in contact with the flu virus or dealing with people with weakened immune systems.
        • National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) Attempt to Organize – In many situations after a mandatory vaccination policy is announced, there is a group of people who respond with an attempt to organize to limit the applicability of the policy and/or try to change the policy. This would be concerted activity protected by the NLRA and the organization should be mindful of the potential protected conduct.
        • Workers’ Compensation – If an organization were to require a vaccine, any employee who suffers a complication from the vaccine (death is highly unlikely, but there can be other side effects), may be able to assert that the complications and any time away from work resulting from the complications is covered by workers’ compensation.

        Employer should keep all of the above considerations in mind when determining whether a mandatory flu vaccine policy makes sense for the organizations. As opposed to mandating vaccines, employers may want to consider recommending that all employees receive the vaccine and focus language on the effect their absence has on the team they work with and production scheduling.

        Whether the flu vaccine is mandated or recommended, should employers be offering the ability to obtain a flu shot at work, the employer should keep the following in mind:

        • Protect identities of individuals receiving the vaccination and keep private the listing of employee’s names.
        • Provide a location offering some degree of privacy to those receiving the vaccine.
        • Additionally, the CDC has issued a helpful packet of documents to keep in mind and consider as you move through the process.

        For further questions on vaccines in the workplace, contact a member of Verrill’s Employment and Labor practice group.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...