Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Health Care Reform Grandfather Regulations Issued [Part 2] – Other Rules

        June 21, 2010

        In our last post we suggested that the grandfather regulations provide one particularly bright spot for employers, and indeed they do: the regulations clarify that Health Care Reform generally does not apply to certain retiree-only plans and benefit plans that are exempt from compliance with HIPAA (such as dental-only and vision-only plans), as well as certain health flexible spending accounts.

        This is important enough to bear repeating: most retiree-only, dental-only, vision-only, and health flexible spending accounts will not be affected by Health Care Reform (or these grandfather rules).

        The grandfather regulations clarify how Health Care Reform applies to collectively bargained plans. Both self-funded and fully insured collectively bargained plans that are grandfathered are subject to the same requirements as other grandfathered plans. Thus, the provisions that apply to grandfathered health plans apply to collectively bargained plans regardless of whether a collective bargaining agreement is in effect, and changes may be needed to bring a collectively bargained plan into compliance with Health Care Reform mandates before the collective bargaining agreement expires.

        A self-funded collectively bargained plan will maintain grandfather status only if it satisfies the requirements described above and does not make any changes that will result in the loss of grandfather status. An insured collectively bargained plan, however, is entitled to maintain grandfather status at least until the termination of the last related collective bargaining agreement in effect on March 23, 2010.

        The grandfather regulations also provide transitional rules for plan changes made prior to the enactment of Health Care Reform and the issuance of the regulations. Changes made prior to March 23, 2010 will be considered part of the plan terms (even if not effective on March 23) and will not cause a plan to lose grandfather status if the changes are made pursuant to (1) a legally binding contract entered into on or before March 23, (2) a filing made with a state insurance department on or before March 23, or (3) written amendments adopted on or before March 23. Changes made after March 23, 2010 and adopted prior to the issuance of the grandfather regulations (June 14, 2010) will not cause a plan to lose grandfather status if (1) the changes are revoked or modified as of the first day of the first plan year on or after September 23, 2010 and (2) the terms of the plan on that date would not cause the plan to lose grandfather status.

        The new regulations provide meaningful guidance on grandfathered health plans, but we expect further agency guidance on this issue. At this point employers should review their group health plan benefit offerings and decide whether the protection of grandfather status is worth the limited flexibility and prohibitions imposed by it. Depending on the benefits provided, some employers may find that the loss of grandfather status results only in modest health plan cost increases. For other employers, however, loss of grandfather status could result in substantial increases in the cost of providing health coverage.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...