Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Health Care Reform Grandfather Regulations Issued [Part 2] – Other Rules

        June 21, 2010

        In our last post we suggested that the grandfather regulations provide one particularly bright spot for employers, and indeed they do: the regulations clarify that Health Care Reform generally does not apply to certain retiree-only plans and benefit plans that are exempt from compliance with HIPAA (such as dental-only and vision-only plans), as well as certain health flexible spending accounts.

        This is important enough to bear repeating: most retiree-only, dental-only, vision-only, and health flexible spending accounts will not be affected by Health Care Reform (or these grandfather rules).

        The grandfather regulations clarify how Health Care Reform applies to collectively bargained plans. Both self-funded and fully insured collectively bargained plans that are grandfathered are subject to the same requirements as other grandfathered plans. Thus, the provisions that apply to grandfathered health plans apply to collectively bargained plans regardless of whether a collective bargaining agreement is in effect, and changes may be needed to bring a collectively bargained plan into compliance with Health Care Reform mandates before the collective bargaining agreement expires.

        A self-funded collectively bargained plan will maintain grandfather status only if it satisfies the requirements described above and does not make any changes that will result in the loss of grandfather status. An insured collectively bargained plan, however, is entitled to maintain grandfather status at least until the termination of the last related collective bargaining agreement in effect on March 23, 2010.

        The grandfather regulations also provide transitional rules for plan changes made prior to the enactment of Health Care Reform and the issuance of the regulations. Changes made prior to March 23, 2010 will be considered part of the plan terms (even if not effective on March 23) and will not cause a plan to lose grandfather status if the changes are made pursuant to (1) a legally binding contract entered into on or before March 23, (2) a filing made with a state insurance department on or before March 23, or (3) written amendments adopted on or before March 23. Changes made after March 23, 2010 and adopted prior to the issuance of the grandfather regulations (June 14, 2010) will not cause a plan to lose grandfather status if (1) the changes are revoked or modified as of the first day of the first plan year on or after September 23, 2010 and (2) the terms of the plan on that date would not cause the plan to lose grandfather status.

        The new regulations provide meaningful guidance on grandfathered health plans, but we expect further agency guidance on this issue. At this point employers should review their group health plan benefit offerings and decide whether the protection of grandfather status is worth the limited flexibility and prohibitions imposed by it. Depending on the benefits provided, some employers may find that the loss of grandfather status results only in modest health plan cost increases. For other employers, however, loss of grandfather status could result in substantial increases in the cost of providing health coverage.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...