Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Health Care Reform Grandfather Regulations Issued – Ways to Lose Status

        June 18, 2010

        Treasury, DOL, and HHS have issued joint interim final regulations addressing grandfathered health plan status under Health Care Reform. These rules are effective immediately but are subject to future revision.

        The grandfather regulations are long, complex, and better handled over two posts. Today we will discuss the ways a plan will lose grandfather status. Our next post will discuss the special rules for collectively bargained plans, transitional rules, one particularly bright spot for employers, and what these regulations mean for employers.

        A grandfathered health plan is a group health plan (insured or self-funded) in operation on March 23, 2010. As we discussed in our June 11 post, grandfathered plans are not subject to certain provisions of Health Care Reform, though some mandates do apply. Grandfather status is determined separately for each benefit package under a group health plan. Thus, loss of grandfather status for one benefit offering will not affect the grandfather status of other offerings.

        The following changes will cause a plan to lose its grandfather status:

        1. Entering into a new policy, certificate, or contract of insurance with a current issuer or changing issuers (except for insured collectively bargained plans during the term of an agreement related to the coverage).
        2. Elimination of all or substantially all benefits to diagnose or treat a particular condition.
        3. Any increase to an individual’s percentage coinsurance or other cost-sharing requirement.
        4. Any increase in a fixed-amount cost-sharing requirement (such as deductibles or out-of-pocket limits, but not copayments) above the rate of medical inflation plus 15 percentage points.
        5. Any increase in copayments above the greater of (a) the rate of medical inflation plus 15 percentage points or (b) $5.00, as adjusted for medical inflation.
        6. Any decrease in the employer contribution rate towards the cost of any tier of coverage by more than 5 percentage points.
        7. Decreasing or imposing a new annual benefit limit (except that plans with an existing lifetime limit may impose an overall annual limit lower than the lifetime limit).
        8. Violating anti-abuse rules related to certain conduct during mergers, acquisitions, or similar business restructuring and plan transfers.
        9. Failure to disclose grandfather status in the plan document and disclosure materials (the regulations provide model language).
        10. Failure to adhere to certain record-keeping practices.

        The following changes will not cause a plan to lose its grandfather status:

        1. Changes to premiums.
        2. Changes to voluntarily comply with health care reform mandates.
        3. Changes adopted prior to June 14, 2010 that would cause a plan or coverage to lose grandfather status, if those changes are revoked and the plan or coverage is modified effective as of the first day of the first plan year on or after September 23, 2010.
        4. In general, changes adopted before March 23, 2010 but with an effective date after that date.
        5. Changing a self-insured plan’s third-party administrator.
        6. Addition of current enrollees’ family members and newly hired or newly enrolled employees and their families; these new enrollees will be covered according to a plan’s grandfathered terms.
        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...