Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices Refresh for Self-Insured Group Health Plans: What to Change Before February 16, 2026

        by Karen K. Hartford on January 6, 2026

        Self-insured group health plans are HIPAA “covered entities” and—unlike most fully insured arrangements—typically must maintain and distribute their own HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP). The NPP is a legally required statement that explains how the plan may use and disclose protected health information (PHI), participants’ rights, and the plan’s privacy obligations under federal law. When the NPP is inaccurate or out of date, it can create regulatory exposure, audit friction, participant complaints, or litigation.

        An NPP compliance deadline is approaching fast. By February 16, 2026, covered entities must update their NPPs to reflect amendments to the HIPAA Privacy Rule that align HIPAA with the federal confidentiality framework for substance use disorder (SUD) treatment records under 42 C.F.R. Part 2 (Part 2). These changes stem from a multi-year federal effort to harmonize HIPAA and Part 2 while preserving heightened confidentiality protections for SUD treatment information. In addition, plan sponsors should confirm that their NPPs do not reference HIPAA Privacy Rule amendments addressing reproductive health care information that were finalized in 2024 but later vacated and are no longer in effect.

        This post focuses on what plan sponsors should do now to prepare their HIPAA NPPs for February 2026—what to add, revise, and remove. Since fully insured group health plans are not subject to the requirements discussed in this post, references to group health plans in this post refer only to self-insured group health plans.

        What is “Part 2,” and why does it matter to health plans?

        42 C.F.R. Part 2 is a federal regulation governing the confidentiality of substance use disorder patient records maintained by certain SUD treatment providers, referred to as “Part 2 programs.” Part 2 predates HIPAA and is intentionally more restrictive, reflecting a longstanding federal policy concern that individuals might forgo SUD treatment if their information could be widely disclosed.

        Generally, a Part 2 program is a federally assisted person or entity whose primary function is the diagnosis, treatment, or referral for treatment of a substance use disorder, or a specialized SUD unit within a larger organization (such as a hospital). Federal assistance is defined broadly and can include, among other things, participation in Medicare or Medicaid or receipt of federal funds directly or indirectly.

        Importantly for plan sponsors:

        • Group health plans are not Part 2 programs.
        • However, plans and their vendors can receive Part 2-protected records through claims appeals, utilization management, care coordination, behavioral health carve-outs, Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs), or case management.
        • Once Part 2-protected information is lawfully disclosed to a HIPAA covered entity, special restrictions on use and redisclosure may continue to apply, even though the recipient is not itself a Part 2 program.

        February 16, 2026, compliance deadline

        In January 2024, federal regulators finalized amendments to 42 C.F.R. Part 2 that modernized the rule and aligned key aspects of Part 2 with HIPAA, particularly regarding treatment, payment, and health care operations. While the Part 2 Final Rule became effective in April 2024, covered entities and business associates have until February 16, 2026, to comply with its requirements.

        As part of this alignment effort, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revised HIPAA’s Notice of Privacy Practices requirements to ensure that individuals receive clear and accurate notice of how sensitive SUD information may be used, disclosed, and protected. Although not every group health plan will regularly encounter Part 2-protected records, the NPP must still be drafted to disclose participants’ rights and the plan’s legal obligations when such records are involved.

        What NPP changes are required?

        With respect to Part 2, plan sponsors will want to review their NPPs to ensure that their notices:

        • Do not inaccurately suggest that all SUD treatment information is treated identically to other PHI in every context
        • Properly reflect that additional legal protections may apply to certain SUD records, depending on how they are created and received
        • Accurately describe the plan’s legal duties without overstating or understating a participant’s rights

        These changes do not require plans to identify themselves as Part 2 programs or to describe Part 2 consent mechanics in detail. However, they require careful, precise drafting—especially in the “Uses and Disclosures” and “Our Responsibilities” sections of the NPP.

        Separately, in 2024, regulators finalized HIPAA Privacy Rule amendments addressing reproductive health care information and set a delayed compliance date—also February 16, 2026—for related NPP updates. Those amendments included new prohibitions on certain uses and disclosures, as well as an attestation framework that many sponsors began incorporating into draft or revised NPPs.

        In June 2025, however, a Texas federal district court vacated the reproductive-health-specific HIPAA amendments nationwide. As a result, the reproductive health privacy provisions are not enforceable, and the related NPP content is now moot. HHS subsequently confirmed in a press release that covered entities are not required to implement the vacated provisions and that the only remaining NPP updates subject to the February 16, 2026, compliance date are those relating to the Part 2 alignment amendments.

        For plan sponsors, this means that any reproductive-health-specific descriptions added to an NPP to comply with the 2024 rule must now be removed or revised so the notice accurately reflects current law.

        What self-insured plan sponsors should be doing now

        1. Identify where Part 2-protected information could appear

        Review plan operations and vendor relationships, including:

        • Behavioral health administrators
        • EAPs
        • Care management and utilization review vendors
        • Appeals and grievance workflows
        • Stop-loss reporting channels

        The goal is to understand where Part 2-protected records may enter your HIPAA-regulated processes.

        1. Thoughtfully update the NPP

        A February 2026-ready NPP should:

        • Retain standard HIPAA notice elements
        • Avoid categorical statements that all PHI is treated the same in all circumstances
        • Include carefully framed language acknowledging that some SUD treatment information may be subject to additional legal protection
        • Remove reproductive-health-rule language tied to vacated provisions
        1. Align policies, procedures, and contracts

        Plan sponsors should confirm that:

        • Written HIPAA policies and procedures address the handling of sensitive SUD information
        • Internal training materials are consistent with the revised NPP
        • Business Associate Agreements and service agreements allocate responsibility for NPP distribution and compliance
        1. Plan for compliant distribution

        Ensure the revised NPP is:

        • Re-distributed to all participants following these material revisions
        • Distributed to new enrollees
        • Made known/available through required periodic reminders (at least once every three years)
        • Properly archived with version control and evidence of distribution

        If you need help updating your HIPAA Notice of Privacy Practices, please contact Karen Hartford or any member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation practice group.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        Working 9 to 5? It’s a Way to Make a Livin’, so Make Sure You’re Payin’ for Every Minute: A Maine Employer’s Guide to Stacked Wage & Hour Rules

        Four decades after Dolly Parton gave us both the namesake anthem of the American workday and the film about three fed-up office workers’ dreams of...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Can AI Pass the Doctor Test? FDA Considers Physician-Inspired Evaluation of GenAI Devices and Other Regulatory Measures

        AI is entering healthcare with indomitable will. It promises to increase efficiency, reduce administrative burden (which healthcare providers so...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Attorney Annabel Rodriguez Named Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez has been recognized as a Top Women of Law by Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, and will be...
        Blog

        What Employee Benefits Lawyers Do (and How to Make the Best Use of Us)

        What do employee benefits lawyers do all day and how can clients make the best use of them? This post offers an overview of the kinds of things...
        Media Mentions

        Bloomberg Law Quotes Robert Keach on Expanded Access to Small Business Reorganization

        Verrill attorney Bob Keach was recently featured in Bloomberg Law, discussing legislation that would raise debt limits for bankruptcy relief and...
        Blog

        Phil Bartlett to Step Down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission

        On September 15, 2026, Governor Janet Mills announced that Phil Bartlett will step down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC)...
        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...