Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Hybrid (Cash Balance/Pension Equity) Plan Regulations: Market Rate Amendments

        by Eric D. Altholz on November 8, 2010

        In October the IRS released regulations, in final and proposed form, intended to provide clarity in the utterly complicated area of hybrid pension plans, the two most common of which are cash balance plans and pension equity plans. These new regulations address:

        • “market rate” of return limits for interest credits;
        • anti-wear away protections for cash balance plan conversions;
        • relief from the requirement to perform “whipsaw” calculations in determining lump sum distributions;
        • benefit designs that satisfy age discrimination rules;
        • three-year mandatory vesting; and
        • new definitions and effective dates for conversion amendments.

        The final regulations are generally effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2011, but the proposed market rate of return standard is delayed for one year (plan sponsors may rely on this and other prior guidance before then). Sponsors of cash balance and other hybrid plans should consult plan actuaries or legal advisors to determine how these new regulations impact their plans.

        Sponsors of hybrid plans with interest credits that may exceed proposed market rates generally seem to be aware they may have to amend their plans, but may be curious about timing for adoption of such an amendment.

        Under rules for cash balance and other hybrid plans enacted in the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (Pub. L. No. 109-280), a plan is deemed noncompliant with age discrimination rules if it provides interest credits based on a rate that exceeds a market rate of return. Final regulations list variable bond-based rates that a plan may use as a market rate, as well cost-of-living indices under the required minimum distribution rules increased by as much as 300 basis points. The proposed regulations would allow an equity-based market rate of return on aggregate plan assets or a rate of return on certain mutual funds, although single industry funds and non-U.S. based funds generally are excluded. The proposed regulations also would permit the use of a fixed rate that does not exceed five percent, an annual fixed-rate floor of up to four percent (if used with a permitted bond-based rate), and a cumulative fixed-rate floor of up to three percent if used with a permissible equity-based rate.

        For plans that happen to specify rates for interest credits that are considered above-market under the new rules, plan sponsors may need to adopt plan amendments to conform to a market rate. We expect sponsors to await final market rate regulations prior to adopting such amendments, to allow evaluation of available options and, in no small part, because the Treasury Department and IRS have indicated they expect to provide cutback relief for such amendments, although such relief does not exist at the present time. (In general, required plan amendments must be adopted by the date of the employer’s tax return for the year first takes effect or, for an amendment that reduces future benefits, before the beginning of the first plan year in which the reduction applies.) The rulemaking process may be tracked online (Keyword: IRS REG-132554-08).

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...