Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        New Massachusetts Equal Pay Law is not Effective Until January 1, 2018, But Employers Should Pay Attention Now

        August 2, 2016

        On August 1, 2016, Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker signed into law sweeping changes to the state’s prohibition on discrimination in pay on the basis of an employee’s gender. The law is one of the most aggressive equal pay laws passed in the United States and contains unique provisions to combat pay disparities.

        The law, entitled “An Act to establish equal pay,” goes farther than the prohibition on pay discrimination currently found in Massachusetts General Law ch. 149, § 105A by, among other things, making certain employer practices that may have the unintended effect of perpetuating pay disparities unlawful. For example, the law makes it unlawful for an employer to:

        • Require that employees refrain from inquiring about, discussing, or disclosing information about either the employee’s own wages or about any other employee’s wages;
        • Screen job applicants based on their wage histories;
        • Request or require that an applicant disclose prior wages or salary history;
        • Seek the salary history of a prospective employee from the employee’s current or former employer unless the prospective employee gives the prospective employer written authorization to obtain such information after an offer of employment has been made.

        In other words, the law seeks to achieve pay equity by allowing employees to discuss and obtain information about their comparative wages and by attempting to prevent employees’ formerly disparate pay from impacting their pay at a new employer.

        The law does not go into effect until January 1, 2018, but employers should pay attention now because it also provides certain protections for employers from employee lawsuits. In a lawsuit by one or more employees for discrimination in pay on the basis of gender, an employer may assert an affirmative defense to liability if it has previously taken steps to eliminate pay disparities. Specifically, the affirmative defense is available if, within the 3 years prior to the commencement of the lawsuit, the employer has:

        1. completed a self-evaluation of its pay practices in good faith, and
        2. can demonstrate that reasonable progress has been made towards eliminating pay disparities based on gender in accordance with the evaluation.

        The employer’s evaluation does not have to take any particular form and may be of the employer’s own design as long as it is reasonable in detail and scope in light of the size of the employer. The attorney general may also provide (at some point in the future) standard templates or forms employers can use to conduct the evaluation.

        Based on the affirmative defense available to employers under Massachusetts law, and the increasing interest in pay equity issues across the country, employers should take steps to audit their pay practices now. If you have questions about how to conduct the audit (including how to do so under attorney-client privilege) and what to do if you uncover pay disparities, Verrill Dana’s Labor & Employment Group is here to help.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...