Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Proposed Regulations on How to Use Forfeiture Accounts: Helpful Guidance and a Great Reminder to Plan Sponsors

        by Kenneth F. Ginder on March 7, 2023

        On February 27, 2023, the IRS published proposed regulations on the use of forfeitures in qualified retirement plans.[1] For defined contribution plans, the regulations provide welcome clarity on what forfeitures can be used for and the date by which forfeitures must be used. In addition, they provide a helpful transition rule and, most importantly, serve as a reminder that forfeiture accounts must be used promptly to avoid an operational failure that will place the plan’s tax-qualified status at risk.

        In the Spring of 2010, the IRS warned plan sponsors in its “Retirement News for Employers” about the improper use of forfeiture accounts. The IRS explained that a common mistake it finds in defined contribution plans is that plan administrators place forfeitures in a separate plan account, “allowing them to accumulate over several years.”[2] The IRS stated that the “Internal Revenue Code does not allow this practice” and that forfeitures “must be used or allocated in the plan year incurred.” Later in the article, however, the IRS further stated that forfeitures used to pay plan expenses or reduce employer contributions should be used promptly in the year “they occurred or in appropriate situations no later than the immediately succeeding plan year.” (Emphasis added.) The IRS did not explain what would constitute an “appropriate situation.”

        More than a decade after the IRS issued its newsletter guidance, it is not uncommon to find defined contribution plans with forfeiture accounts that have been accumulating for years. The proposed regulations serve as a helpful reminder that forfeitures must be used promptly. In addition, the proposed regulations would help with the administration of defined contribution plans in three ways:

        1. Uses for Forfeitures: The proposed regulations clarify that forfeitures can be used for one or more of the following purposes: (i) to pay plan administrative expenses, (ii) to reduce employer contributions under the plan, or (iii) to increase benefits in other participants’ accounts in accordance with plan terms.
        2. Timing for Use of Forfeitures: The proposed regulations clarify that forfeitures must be used no later than 12 months after the close of the plan year in which the forfeiture occurs. Administrators will likely welcome this rule. It is simple and straightforward, and there is no need to determine whether an “appropriate situation” exists in order to use the forfeiture in the year following the year it arises.
        3. Transition Period: The proposed regulations include a helpful transition rule related to the 12-month deadline. Under the transition rule, forfeitures incurred during any plan year that begins before January 1, 2024, will be treated as having been incurred in the first plan year that begins on or after January 1, 2024. Presumably the IRS included this generous transition period because it is aware that there are many plans with large forfeiture accounts, built up over numerous years, and it wants to provide plan sponsors with time to address this forfeitures issue.

        The regulations are proposed to apply for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2024; however, taxpayers may rely on the proposed regulations for periods preceding the applicability date. Therefore, sponsors can use these proposed rules now.

        In light of the proposed regulations, we recommend that plan sponsors:

        1. Review the terms of their plan document regarding the use of forfeitures;
        2. Determine if their plan has forfeitures and, if so, the plan year(s) the forfeitures arose; and
        3. Analyze whether forfeitures are being administered in accordance with the terms of the plan and current law (in particular, whether forfeitures are being used timely and for proper purposes).

        If you conclude that forfeitures are not being administered properly, there are opportunities to correct the error and we would be happy to assist.

        We also recommend considering whether the terms of your plan should be amended. For example, if your plan document only allows forfeitures to be used to pay plan administrative expenses, or if it requires that forfeitures be used in the year incurred, amending the plan to expand the use of forfeitures or extend the time by which forfeitures must be used, as provided in the proposed regulations, would reduce the risk of an operational failure.

        If you have questions regarding your plan’s forfeiture account, please contact a member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] Although this post focuses on defined contribution plans, the proposed regulations would also affect defined benefit plans, reflecting changes in law since the original regulations (Treas. Reg. §1.401-7) were issued in 1963.

        [2] These accounts are often referred to as forfeiture accounts or suspense accounts.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...