Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Retirement Plans: What Categories of Employees may be Excluded?

        March 28, 2024

        We are often asked about the permissibility of excluding certain categories of employees from participating in an employer’s tax-qualified retirement plan.[1] This post provides a high-level summary of what is and is not permitted.

        • Excludable by Statute. Certain categories of employees, by statute, may be excluded from participating in an employer’s tax-qualified retirement plan. Examples include collectively bargained employees, provided retirement benefits were the subject of good faith bargaining between employee representatives and the employer, and nonresident aliens with no U.S.-source earned income.

        The exclusion for nonresident aliens is especially helpful for U.S. companies that are members of a controlled group of corporations that includes foreign corporations because, under the controlled group rules, all employees of all controlled group members are treated as employed by a single employer. Without this exclusion, it might not be possible for that U.S. company to offer a retirement plan to its employees because the plan would not cover enough nonhighly compensated employees, taking into account the employees of all controlled group members.

        • Excludable Without Any Fail-Safe Provision. A tax-qualified retirement plan may exclude other categories of employees without any “fail-safe” provision if the exclusion is not service-based. An exclusion is not service-based if it is based on job function or some other common factor that is not tied to service. Examples include employees who are warehouse employees, employees in Division X of the employer, employees in the Kansas City, Missouri office, and retail employees other than those employed in retail stores in New Hampshire.

        A “fail-safe” provision is a plan provision stating that the plan will not exclude an employee in the excluded category who has attained age 21 and completed either one 1 year of service (as defined in the statute) or, in the case of elective deferrals to a 401(k) plan, the alternative SECURE 2.0 long-term, part-time employee (“LTPT”) service requirement.

        • Excludable With Fail-Safe Provision. If the excluded category is tied to service, the exclusion will not be permissible unless the plan includes a fail-safe provision. Examples include exclusions for employees expected to work fewer than X hours per week (think part-time employees), employees expected to work for a set period (think seasonal or temporary employees), and employees expected to work as needed (think per diems). The reason is that the IRS considers any exclusion that is tied to service to be a minimum service requirement, and tax-qualified retirement plans generally may not, except as explained in the first and second bullet points, exclude employees who are at least 21 years old and have completed one year of service (or, in the case of 401(k) elective deferrals, the alternative LTPT service requirement).

        Even if the excluded category does not specifically refer to service, the IRS nevertheless may view it as a service-based exclusion if, in the context of the employer’s job categories, there is no common factor (e.g., job function or location) for the excluded category apart from service.

        Finally, the ability to exclude categories of employees beyond those described in the first bullet point will always be subject to the plan satisfying the minimum coverage requirements of Code Section 410(b) after giving effect to the exclusion.

        Please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have any questions about excluding certain employee categories from participating in a tax-qualified retirement plan.


        [1] A tax-qualified retirement plan is a plan that meets the requirements of Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”). Examples include 401(k) plans, profit-sharing plans, and defined benefit pension plans.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Recent FinCEN Advisory Highlights Rising Health Care Fraud Risk for Financial Institutions

        As the federal government intensifies its “whole of government” approach to combat fraud, waste, and abuse, particularly in Federal Health Care...