Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Retirement Plans: What Categories of Employees may be Excluded?

        March 28, 2024

        We are often asked about the permissibility of excluding certain categories of employees from participating in an employer’s tax-qualified retirement plan.[1] This post provides a high-level summary of what is and is not permitted.

        • Excludable by Statute. Certain categories of employees, by statute, may be excluded from participating in an employer’s tax-qualified retirement plan. Examples include collectively bargained employees, provided retirement benefits were the subject of good faith bargaining between employee representatives and the employer, and nonresident aliens with no U.S.-source earned income.

        The exclusion for nonresident aliens is especially helpful for U.S. companies that are members of a controlled group of corporations that includes foreign corporations because, under the controlled group rules, all employees of all controlled group members are treated as employed by a single employer. Without this exclusion, it might not be possible for that U.S. company to offer a retirement plan to its employees because the plan would not cover enough nonhighly compensated employees, taking into account the employees of all controlled group members.

        • Excludable Without Any Fail-Safe Provision. A tax-qualified retirement plan may exclude other categories of employees without any “fail-safe” provision if the exclusion is not service-based. An exclusion is not service-based if it is based on job function or some other common factor that is not tied to service. Examples include employees who are warehouse employees, employees in Division X of the employer, employees in the Kansas City, Missouri office, and retail employees other than those employed in retail stores in New Hampshire.

        A “fail-safe” provision is a plan provision stating that the plan will not exclude an employee in the excluded category who has attained age 21 and completed either one 1 year of service (as defined in the statute) or, in the case of elective deferrals to a 401(k) plan, the alternative SECURE 2.0 long-term, part-time employee (“LTPT”) service requirement.

        • Excludable With Fail-Safe Provision. If the excluded category is tied to service, the exclusion will not be permissible unless the plan includes a fail-safe provision. Examples include exclusions for employees expected to work fewer than X hours per week (think part-time employees), employees expected to work for a set period (think seasonal or temporary employees), and employees expected to work as needed (think per diems). The reason is that the IRS considers any exclusion that is tied to service to be a minimum service requirement, and tax-qualified retirement plans generally may not, except as explained in the first and second bullet points, exclude employees who are at least 21 years old and have completed one year of service (or, in the case of 401(k) elective deferrals, the alternative LTPT service requirement).

        Even if the excluded category does not specifically refer to service, the IRS nevertheless may view it as a service-based exclusion if, in the context of the employer’s job categories, there is no common factor (e.g., job function or location) for the excluded category apart from service.

        Finally, the ability to exclude categories of employees beyond those described in the first bullet point will always be subject to the plan satisfying the minimum coverage requirements of Code Section 410(b) after giving effect to the exclusion.

        Please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have any questions about excluding certain employee categories from participating in a tax-qualified retirement plan.


        [1] A tax-qualified retirement plan is a plan that meets the requirements of Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”). Examples include 401(k) plans, profit-sharing plans, and defined benefit pension plans.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...