Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Retirement Plans: What Categories of Employees may be Excluded?

        March 28, 2024

        We are often asked about the permissibility of excluding certain categories of employees from participating in an employer’s tax-qualified retirement plan.[1] This post provides a high-level summary of what is and is not permitted.

        • Excludable by Statute. Certain categories of employees, by statute, may be excluded from participating in an employer’s tax-qualified retirement plan. Examples include collectively bargained employees, provided retirement benefits were the subject of good faith bargaining between employee representatives and the employer, and nonresident aliens with no U.S.-source earned income.

        The exclusion for nonresident aliens is especially helpful for U.S. companies that are members of a controlled group of corporations that includes foreign corporations because, under the controlled group rules, all employees of all controlled group members are treated as employed by a single employer. Without this exclusion, it might not be possible for that U.S. company to offer a retirement plan to its employees because the plan would not cover enough nonhighly compensated employees, taking into account the employees of all controlled group members.

        • Excludable Without Any Fail-Safe Provision. A tax-qualified retirement plan may exclude other categories of employees without any “fail-safe” provision if the exclusion is not service-based. An exclusion is not service-based if it is based on job function or some other common factor that is not tied to service. Examples include employees who are warehouse employees, employees in Division X of the employer, employees in the Kansas City, Missouri office, and retail employees other than those employed in retail stores in New Hampshire.

        A “fail-safe” provision is a plan provision stating that the plan will not exclude an employee in the excluded category who has attained age 21 and completed either one 1 year of service (as defined in the statute) or, in the case of elective deferrals to a 401(k) plan, the alternative SECURE 2.0 long-term, part-time employee (“LTPT”) service requirement.

        • Excludable With Fail-Safe Provision. If the excluded category is tied to service, the exclusion will not be permissible unless the plan includes a fail-safe provision. Examples include exclusions for employees expected to work fewer than X hours per week (think part-time employees), employees expected to work for a set period (think seasonal or temporary employees), and employees expected to work as needed (think per diems). The reason is that the IRS considers any exclusion that is tied to service to be a minimum service requirement, and tax-qualified retirement plans generally may not, except as explained in the first and second bullet points, exclude employees who are at least 21 years old and have completed one year of service (or, in the case of 401(k) elective deferrals, the alternative LTPT service requirement).

        Even if the excluded category does not specifically refer to service, the IRS nevertheless may view it as a service-based exclusion if, in the context of the employer’s job categories, there is no common factor (e.g., job function or location) for the excluded category apart from service.

        Finally, the ability to exclude categories of employees beyond those described in the first bullet point will always be subject to the plan satisfying the minimum coverage requirements of Code Section 410(b) after giving effect to the exclusion.

        Please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have any questions about excluding certain employee categories from participating in a tax-qualified retirement plan.


        [1] A tax-qualified retirement plan is a plan that meets the requirements of Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”). Examples include 401(k) plans, profit-sharing plans, and defined benefit pension plans.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...