You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Sweepstakes for Charity: Try Your Luck at Avoiding Regulators

        by Robert Laplaca on May 20, 2021

        Sometimes doing good isn’t easy. Say you’re a company that wants to run a sweepstakes by asking entrants for donations to charity. Sounds simple. Everyone will think you’re an A-1, socially conscious brand that isn’t even looking to make a profit. Everyone that is, except possibly state regulators.

        Let’s say your savvy enough to know that you can’t require a donation to receive an entry. No Purchase Necessary also means No Donation Necessary. But how do you provide equal dignity to the non-donating entrants when the donating entrants are receiving more entries for higher donations? Having online “free” entries along with the option to pay/donate to enter may not entice donations. Mail-in “free” entries may be sufficiently more cumbersome to encourage online donations, but one entry per outer envelope may not cut it. Needless to say, time spent thinking through the proper method of allotting rough justice is critical. (Hint: Perhaps you can have pre-set donations online (such as $25, $50, $75, $100) and give mail-in entrants 25 entries per outer envelope, while limiting total entries to 100.)

        Now that you got that straightened out, did you stop to consider that you may be soliciting donations on behalf of the charity? So? So, soliciting donations for compensation (or even “other consideration”) could turn you into the highly-regulated “professional fundraiser.” Normally, you don’t want to be a “professional fundraiser” unless that is your business. Professional fundraisers have to register and bond in about 40 states and are subject to reporting, recordkeeping and disclosure requirements. And charities typically must identify all professional fundraisers they use on their state filings.

        But how can you be a professional fundraiser when you’re not trying to make any money from your altruism? What if you only want to keep a portion of the donations to pay for your expenses? Getting any compensation for your solicitation efforts will likely make you a “professional fundraiser.” And don’t even think of funding the prize/prize money with donations. You now may be running an illegal raffle, since typically only charities can hold raffles.

        But all is not lost. If you are solely putting up your own money to run the sweepstakes and not taking any cut of the donations, you are in a much better position. But maybe not completely out of the woods because some “professional fundraiser” statutes include not only receiving compensation ($$$) for your efforts but also the nebulous “other consideration.” Would the goodwill you engender from the public (and the charity) count as “other consideration”? It shouldn’t, but frankly, there’s not much guidance here and only the Shadow knows.

        Running a sweepstakes with donations is great idea, but, as promised, it may not be as easy as it sounds.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...