Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Traps for the Unwary: COBRA and Retiree Medical

        July 5, 2011

        Employers often ask about their obligations to offer COBRA benefits to terminating employees who are eligible for retiree medical coverage, and with good reason. The interplay between COBRA and alternative retiree coverage is complicated, and an employer faces steep penalties in the event of a mistake. Whether COBRA coverage must be offered to a terminating employee eligible for retiree medical depends on two factors: the terms of the plan under which retirees are covered and the steps an employee must take to be covered under retiree medical.

        If retirees are covered under the same plan on the same terms and conditions (including percentage of premium paid by the employer) as active employees and are automatically enrolled in retiree coverage, then in most cases COBRA need not be offered at the time of termination. Further, if the period of retiree coverage lasts at least as long as the applicable COBRA coverage period then COBRA need not be offered at the expiration of the retiree coverage. (This is because the loss of coverage did not occur within the maximum coverage period after the termination of employment occurred.) In our experience few employer-sponsored health plans fit into this category.

        If, however, retirees are covered under a separate group health plan (even if the plan is identical to the plan covering active employees) or under the same plan as active employees but under different terms or conditions, then COBRA coverage must be offered at the same time retiree medical coverage is offered. This is true even if COBRA coverage is less attractive to beneficiaries than retiree medical coverage. An employer may expressly condition receipt of alternative retiree coverage on the qualified beneficiary’s waiver of COBRA coverage. If an employer does this, then the terminating employee will retain his or her right to elect COBRA coverage throughout the 60-day election period (even if he or she immediately chooses the alternative retiree coverage), and the COBRA waiver will not be final until the election period expires. Each qualified beneficiary has a separate opportunity to waive COBRA. The waiver must be informed, so an employer taking this approach should clearly communicate to the retiree, and any dependents eligible for retiree coverage, that electing retiree coverage will waive the COBRA rights of anyone electing retiree coverage. Once the election period expires the COBRA benefit is generally lost for good and need not be provided when the retiree coverage terminates.

        If the spouse or child of a retiree receiving retiree coverage would lose coverage as a result of a qualifying event (death of the retiree, divorce, or a child’s ceasing to be a dependent), the spouse or child must be given the opportunity to elect continued coverage, with a maximum coverage period of 36 months from the date of the qualifying event. If, however, the design of the alternative coverage is such that it is provided only for a fixed period for the retiree’s spouse/dependent children and would not end upon the occurrence of a COBRA-qualifying event, then the employer does not need to offer a COBRA election upon the occurrence of a COBRA-qualifying event.

        It is extremely important for employers to be sure that they are properly meeting their COBRA obligations. Code Section 4980B imposes an excise tax of $100 per day ($200 per day per family if more than one qualified beneficiary with respect to the same qualifying event is affected) for each day that an employer fails to offer required COBRA coverage, beginning with the date the failure first occurred and ending the earlier of the date the failure is corrected and six months after the last date on which the employer could have been required to provide COBRA coverage. For a long-standing failure involving a terminated employee, this could mean that an employer may face 24 months of excise tax, at a cost of $100 (or $200) per affected qualified beneficiary per day. There are special limits depending on when the failure is discovered and whether it is due to reasonable cause, but obviously this mistake can get very expensive very quickly. Excise taxes must be reported on Form 8928.

        If an employer discovers a mistake in its COBRA administration it may still avoid the excise tax by acting quickly. Code Section 4980B provides that the excise tax will not apply in the case of an error that is corrected within 30 days after discovery, as long as: (1) the failure was due to reasonable cause, as opposed to willful neglect; and (2) the employer has not received an IRS audit letter. A COBRA failure is considered corrected if the failure is retroactively undone to the extent possible and any affected beneficiary is placed in a financial position as good as the beneficiary would have been had the failure not occurred.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...