Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Traps for the Unwary: COBRA and Retiree Medical

        July 5, 2011

        Employers often ask about their obligations to offer COBRA benefits to terminating employees who are eligible for retiree medical coverage, and with good reason. The interplay between COBRA and alternative retiree coverage is complicated, and an employer faces steep penalties in the event of a mistake. Whether COBRA coverage must be offered to a terminating employee eligible for retiree medical depends on two factors: the terms of the plan under which retirees are covered and the steps an employee must take to be covered under retiree medical.

        If retirees are covered under the same plan on the same terms and conditions (including percentage of premium paid by the employer) as active employees and are automatically enrolled in retiree coverage, then in most cases COBRA need not be offered at the time of termination. Further, if the period of retiree coverage lasts at least as long as the applicable COBRA coverage period then COBRA need not be offered at the expiration of the retiree coverage. (This is because the loss of coverage did not occur within the maximum coverage period after the termination of employment occurred.) In our experience few employer-sponsored health plans fit into this category.

        If, however, retirees are covered under a separate group health plan (even if the plan is identical to the plan covering active employees) or under the same plan as active employees but under different terms or conditions, then COBRA coverage must be offered at the same time retiree medical coverage is offered. This is true even if COBRA coverage is less attractive to beneficiaries than retiree medical coverage. An employer may expressly condition receipt of alternative retiree coverage on the qualified beneficiary’s waiver of COBRA coverage. If an employer does this, then the terminating employee will retain his or her right to elect COBRA coverage throughout the 60-day election period (even if he or she immediately chooses the alternative retiree coverage), and the COBRA waiver will not be final until the election period expires. Each qualified beneficiary has a separate opportunity to waive COBRA. The waiver must be informed, so an employer taking this approach should clearly communicate to the retiree, and any dependents eligible for retiree coverage, that electing retiree coverage will waive the COBRA rights of anyone electing retiree coverage. Once the election period expires the COBRA benefit is generally lost for good and need not be provided when the retiree coverage terminates.

        If the spouse or child of a retiree receiving retiree coverage would lose coverage as a result of a qualifying event (death of the retiree, divorce, or a child’s ceasing to be a dependent), the spouse or child must be given the opportunity to elect continued coverage, with a maximum coverage period of 36 months from the date of the qualifying event. If, however, the design of the alternative coverage is such that it is provided only for a fixed period for the retiree’s spouse/dependent children and would not end upon the occurrence of a COBRA-qualifying event, then the employer does not need to offer a COBRA election upon the occurrence of a COBRA-qualifying event.

        It is extremely important for employers to be sure that they are properly meeting their COBRA obligations. Code Section 4980B imposes an excise tax of $100 per day ($200 per day per family if more than one qualified beneficiary with respect to the same qualifying event is affected) for each day that an employer fails to offer required COBRA coverage, beginning with the date the failure first occurred and ending the earlier of the date the failure is corrected and six months after the last date on which the employer could have been required to provide COBRA coverage. For a long-standing failure involving a terminated employee, this could mean that an employer may face 24 months of excise tax, at a cost of $100 (or $200) per affected qualified beneficiary per day. There are special limits depending on when the failure is discovered and whether it is due to reasonable cause, but obviously this mistake can get very expensive very quickly. Excise taxes must be reported on Form 8928.

        If an employer discovers a mistake in its COBRA administration it may still avoid the excise tax by acting quickly. Code Section 4980B provides that the excise tax will not apply in the case of an error that is corrected within 30 days after discovery, as long as: (1) the failure was due to reasonable cause, as opposed to willful neglect; and (2) the employer has not received an IRS audit letter. A COBRA failure is considered corrected if the failure is retroactively undone to the extent possible and any affected beneficiary is placed in a financial position as good as the beneficiary would have been had the failure not occurred.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        SAFEs and Preferred Stock – Key Deal Terms Every Founder Should Know

        SAFEs Before negotiating a term sheet for preferred stock, many early-stage companies, particularly at the seed stage, first raise capital through...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Business Restructuring and Insolvency Attorney Nimra Tariq

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Nimra Tariq has joined the firm’s Business Restructuring and Insolvency Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Construction Attorney Cassie Dufon

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to welcome Cassie Dufon to the firm’s Construction Group as an Associate, resident in the firm’s Portland...
        Press Releases

        Verrill’s Wide-Ranging Private Wealth Law Practice Recognized in 2026 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide

        BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine and BOSTON, Mass. – Verrill attorneys Kenneth P. Brier, Anya F. Endsley, Kurt E. Klebe, Mary McQuillen, Nathaniel S....
        Blog

        Update on Status of Maine Packaging EPR

        In December 2024, Verrill published a blog post, Unwrapping Maine's Gift to the Environment: A New Packaging Stewardship Program Set to Launch in...
        Blog

        Voluntary Benefits Move into the ERISA Litigation Crosshairs

        Employee-paid accident, critical-illness, cancer, and hospital-indemnity insurance have long occupied a quiet corner of employee benefit plan...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...