Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        2019 Wrap Up: 10 Points for Reviewing Executive Employment Agreements

        December 31, 2019

        As 2019 ends and 2020 begins, many executives and their employers may be entering into, amending and revising, or renewing employment agreements. It is important for both sides to get it right. An executive’s employment agreement will define expectations regarding role, responsibilities, and performance. It also will establish key contractual obligations for the executive and the employer concerning compensation and benefits, equity grants, the length or term of employment, early termination and its consequences, post-termination restrictions, and dispute resolution. Compensation, termination, and other provisions may implicate tax rules and trigger penalties.

        Expressed in legalese, executive contract provisions may be described as “boilerplate” and routine. Later, if there is disharmony in the relationship or disagreement about the parties’ obligations, these provisions may critically affect the rights and obligations of the parties. While not exhaustive, executives and employers should carefully review how the following ten important considerations are addressed in the executive’s employment agreement:

        1. TERM AND RENEWAL

        An executive’s employment agreement typically will set an effective date and state that the initial term of employment will be for a period of years subject to earlier termination under other provisions of the agreement. In contrast, “at-will” employment can be terminated by either party at any time, for any reason that is not unlawful, and without advance notice. The contract should address whether the relationship is for a term or at-will, and whether the term will end at the expiration of the initial term or will automatically renew for extension periods absent advance notice.

        2. EARLY TERMINATION

        If the agreement is for a term of years, it almost always will include a termination for “Cause” provision, which will allow the employer to terminate the executive’s employment immediately if he or she engages in certain acts or omissions against the employer’s interest, e.g. conviction of a felony. An executive will want the definition of Cause to be reasonably narrow and not unreasonably broad or vague. For conduct that is not egregious, the executive may want the right to receive notice concerning the specific grounds for Cause and an opportunity to cure the behavior to prevent termination. Executives often ask to include a “Good Reason” provision, which will allow the executive to terminate his or her employment immediately and receive severance or salary continuation, e.g. if the employer breaches its material obligations under the contract. Termination by the employer without Cause before the expiration of the terms may require a period of advance notice, e.g. 90 days, or trigger an obligation to pay severance or salary continuation.

        3. COMPENSATION

        An executive should know his or her basic compensation from preliminary discussions prior to receiving the proposed employment agreement. Some elements of compensation can be straightforward, e.g. annual salary paid in equal pay period installments, while others may be more complicated, e.g. formula-based incentive compensation. Bonuses may be discretionary or conditioned upon objective achievements. The contract terms should accurately reflect the parties’ preliminary agreements concerning compensation, bonuses, conditions to payment, annual increases, and the timing for payments.

        4. BENEFITS

        The executive’s fringe benefits and other perquisites of employment may be stated in the agreement in only general terms with accompanying references to plan documents, policies, and procedures. Separate HR documents may need to be reviewed to understand the specifics concerning benefits, e.g. insurance coverage and premiums, enrollment periods, retirement plan service requirements, and carry-over of unused vacation time.

        5. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

        This section of the agreement may specify the executive’s expected duties and responsibilities, but also may impose obligations to perform “other duties as assigned from time-to-time” and may define, limit, or restrict the executive’s participation in outside business and professional development activities.

        6. CLAWBACK PROVISIONS

        Special signing bonuses and relocation expense payments may be conditioned upon full or partial repayment by the executive in the event the executive voluntarily leaves his or her employment within some specified period after commencing employment. Such provisions may be incorporated in the employment agreement by reference to policy or plan documents.

        7. TAX CONSIDERATIONS

        Potentially costly tax issues may be lurking in an executive’s contract provisions. Internal Revenue Code Section 409A applies to compensation that an employee earns in one year, but that is paid in a future year. This is referred to as nonqualified deferred compensation. If deferred compensation meets the requirements of Section 409A, then there is no effect on the employee’s taxes. The compensation is taxed in the same manner as it would be taxed if it were not covered by Section 409A. However, if the deferred compensation does not meet the requirements of Section 409A, the compensation is subject to certain additional taxes, including a 20% additional income tax. 409A issues in employment agreements can arise from bonus payments, severance arrangements, equity awards, releases, and reimbursement arrangements.

        8. EQUITY AWARDS

        Equity awards may include stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units. Important considerations for an executive receiving an equity award include the vesting period, the exercise period, and whether the award will accelerate and become fully vested if the executive’s employment is terminated without cause.

        9. POST-TERMINATION RESTRICTIONS

        Through non-disclosure/confidentiality, non-competition, and non-solicitation provisions contained in an employment agreement (or in an ancillary agreement presented to the executive at his/her start date), an employer may attempt to restrict an executive from working for competitors for some period after the executive’s employment ends. Generally, post-employment restrictions may be enforceable if: (1) they are necessary to protect the employer’s customer relationships or trade secrets/confidential information, and (2) are reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and the scope of proscribed activities.

        10. GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION

        Executive employment agreements typically specify the law that a court or arbitrator will apply to interpret the contract and resolve future disputes, as well as in what state such disputes must be litigated. Executives should be aware that they may be committing to the resolution of a future disagreement in a distant state.

        If you have questions about employment agreements at your company, contact a member of Verrill’s Employment & Labor Group.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...