Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        A Brief Guide to Qualified Disclaimers for Retirement Plan Administrators

        by William D. Jewett on September 16, 2024

        A “qualified disclaimer” is a tax-effective way to refuse a transfer of property that would otherwise occur on someone’s death. From time to time, retirement plan administrators may be contacted by a beneficiary who wants a deceased participant’s benefit to go to a contingent beneficiary or the participant’s estate. The way to make that happen is a qualified disclaimer.

        Suppose a plan administrator is contacted by a participant’s family shortly after the participant’s death. The participant had completed the plan’s beneficiary designation form naming one of her children as primary beneficiary and her other child as contingent beneficiary. The children are certain their parent intended for each to be a 50% primary beneficiary. The beneficiary designation cannot be modified to capture that intent, because beneficiary designations become irrevocable at the participant’s death. If the children want to carry out what they believe to be their parent’s wishes, does one child have to receive the entire interest and pay taxes on it before giving half of it to the other? Yes – unless the primary beneficiary makes a qualified disclaimer with respect to 50% of the interest, leaving that portion of the benefit to pass directly to the contingent beneficiary.

        The requirements for making a qualified disclaimer are set out in Internal Revenue Code section 2518. While this section is found in the part of the tax code that contains the gift tax rules, a qualified disclaimer is generally effective for shifting the burden of income taxes since a qualified disclaimer must result in the property passing directly to another person under applicable state law. To make a qualified disclaimer, four requirements must be met:

        1. The refusal to accept the interest must be in writing.
        2. The refusal must result in the interest passing to someone else under applicable law.
        3. The person refusing the transfer must not have accepted it, including, for example, by cashing a check or by directing the interest to a specific recipient.
        4. The written refusal must be received by the transferor of the interest not later than nine months after the date of the transfer or the date the person refusing reaches age 21.

        In the case of a retirement plan beneficiary, the last requirement means the beneficiary would generally have to submit a written refusal to the plan administrator not later than 9 months after the participant’s death, which is when the transfer is deemed to have occurred.

        It may seem unusual for a beneficiary to refuse a deceased participant’s benefit, but consider the following scenarios. Suppose a primary beneficiary whose children are named as contingent beneficiaries considers that the assets would eventually reach the children in any case and decides it is preferable for the assets to be taxed now at the lower rate applicable to the children. Or suppose a primary beneficiary with another family member or a trust named as contingent beneficiary is the potential target of a legal claim and is seeking to empty his deep pockets while keeping assets close by. Or suppose a participant and the participant’s spouse decide to name the spouse as primary beneficiary with a trust as contingent beneficiary, to give the spouse a choice at the participant’s death whether to accept the assets or to have them go into the trust, whichever is most advantageous at the time. In each scenario, a qualified disclaimer might be used, and a retirement plan administrator receiving a purported disclaimer would need to know what to do with it.

        A retirement plan administrator who receives a purported disclaimer or an inquiry from a beneficiary regarding a potential disclaimer should take two steps right away. The first step is to note the date the disclaimer is received, to ensure that any deadlines based on the date of death are not missed due to inaction on the plan administrator’s part. The second step is to contact legal counsel to determine whether the disclaimer is effective under applicable law and whether the plan would need to be amended to allow the administrator to honor a qualified disclaimer. If a disclaimer is found not to be effective, the disclaimant should be informed promptly and advised to seek separate legal counsel. If it is found to be effective, and if the plan’s provisions permit qualified disclaimers, the plan administrator can direct the plan’s recordkeeper to proceed as if the disclaimant never had a right to the disclaimed interest.

        If you have questions about the effect of qualified disclaimers in the context of retirement plans, please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...