Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        DOL (Finally) Considers Changes to Electronic Disclosure Rules

        May 12, 2011

        The Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) has determined that it may be time to update the rules regarding electronic disclosures. (The current rules were published back in 2002.) Accordingly, EBSA has issued a Request for Information (RFI) soliciting views, suggestions, and comments to determine whether to expand or modify the rules regarding electronic distribution of employee benefit plan information under ERISA.

        Specifically, EBSA has asked for comment on whether, and if so how, the electronic disclosure rules should be revised. EBSA has also asked for feedback on whether the rules should include different rules for different types of benefit plans, disclosures, or recipients, and whether electronic disclosure should be encouraged or required. Finally, EBSA has asked for information on a variety of specific topics, including access to/use of the Internet, popularity of supplying participant disclosures electronically, and technological matters.

        EBSA encourages comments to address any matters germane to this topic, but it has set forth 30 questions to facilitate consideration of the issues. Comments need not address all, or even any, of those questions. The questions fall into four general categories: access and usage, whether/how the rules should be updated, technological matters, and costs/benefits of expanding the rules. Some questions are open-ended, while others ask for specific information. Though the questions are many and varied, there are some common themes:

        • What are the advantages and disadvantages of the electronic disclosure, from both the plan sponsor and participant perspectives?
        • What about the current regulations is troublesome or frustrating?
        • How and with what frequency do participants access and use electronic media?
        • How should the current rules be modified or expanded, taking into account current and future technology, administrative matters, best practices, and the need to protect plan participants?
        • Should different rules apply to different types of plans, disclosures, or recipients?
        • Should electronic disclosure be encouraged? Should it be automatic or required?
        • Under what circumstances should participants be able to opt out of electronic disclosure?

        Many of our clients have expressed frustration with the current electronic disclosure rules, and we have often heard that while our clients have the technology and the will to properly deliver disclosure materials electronically, the current safe harbor’s limitations have constrained (and in some cases prevented) their efforts to do so. We are encouraging clients to respond to the RFI, as it is an important opportunity for them to convey their concerns with the current rules, provide EBSA with useful information, and suggest methods for improving the rules. To assist them with this endeavor we are accepting their comments, which we intend to compile and submit on a no-name basis on their behalves.

        Although we expect EBSA to receive a large volume of comments from a variety of interests, all interested employers, plan sponsors, administrators, service providers, and others should seriously consider submitting a response, not only because this is a chance to shape the disclosure regulations to which anyone involved with or covered by a health or retirement benefit plan are subject, but also because this opportunity is unlikely to repeat itself anytime in the near future. Comments are due by June 6, 2011.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What Employee Benefits Lawyers Do (and How to Make the Best Use of Us)

        What do employee benefits lawyers do all day and how can clients make the best use of them? This post offers an overview of the kinds of things...
        Media Mentions

        Bloomberg Law Quotes Robert Keach on Expanded Access to Small Business Reorganization

        Verrill attorney Bob Keach was recently featured in Bloomberg Law, discussing legislation that would raise debt limits for bankruptcy relief and...
        Blog

        Phil Bartlett to Step Down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission

        On September 15, 2026, Governor Janet Mills announced that Phil Bartlett will step down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC)...
        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...