You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        GLORY, GLORY, HALLELUJAH!

        by Robert Laplaca on May 23, 2023

        Remember that old parody of the Battle Hymn of the Republic we used to sing before there was an Internet? There are apparently many versions, but they all generally involve children inflicting various types of mayhem on their school and its staff.

        The kids of today are now equipped with the powerful COPPA Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 312. And you can chalk one up for the kids when the FTC recently obtained a permanent injunction and $6 million penalty against an online education technology and virtual classroom provider in U.S. v. Edmodo, LLC, Case No. 3:23-cv-02495 (N.D. Cal. 2023). https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/202-3129-edmodo-llc-us-v

        We’re all familiar with, and frankly fearful of, COPPA, which was enacted in 1998 to protect the unauthorized or unnecessary collection of children’s personal information online. For a very brief review, the COPPA Rule requires operators of commercial websites or online services directed to children under 13 to have certain safeguards in place prior to collecting, using or disclosing personal information from children, such as their name, online contact information, telephone number, persistent identifier or image. These safeguards include:

        1. Providing clear, understandable and complete notice of its information practices;
        2. Making reasonable efforts to ensure parents receive direct notice;
        3. Obtaining verifiable parental consent prior to collecting, using or disclosing personal information from children; and
        4. Retaining personal information from children only as long as reasonably necessary to fulfill the purpose for which the information was collected.

        According to the FTC, the Edmodo Platform was an online service that allowed teachers to create a virtual classroom to share materials, give assignments and quizzes, organize events, and allow direct messaging with students and teachers. The free version allowed students and teachers to create accounts and the subscription version allowed schools. Both versions collected personal information about the students including their names, emails, dates of birth and phone numbers.

        The Edmodo Platform’s terms of service put the onus on the schools and teachers to obtain the requisite verifiable parental consent, which may be permissible in an educational context, but the FTC found fault in the following areas:

        1. Disclosure was not on sign-up page. The teacher sign-up page merely stated in small print at the bottom, “By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.”
        2. No express consent to terms and privacy policy at signup. Teachers were not required to click on the linked documents or review them before creating an account.
        3. Terms and privacy policy were cumbersome. The Terms of Service and Privacy Policy contained “a host of information unrelated to [Edmodo’s] collection, use and disclosure of personal information.”
        4. No direct notice to parents. The Privacy Policy could not serve as both direct notice to parents and online notice, both of which are separately required under the COPPA Rule.
        5. Information was used for non-educational purposes. Edmodo could not rely upon the school/teacher acting as agent exception to the COPPA Rule because Edmodo used student information for non-education commercial uses, by collecting persistent identifiers such as device IDs, cookies and IP addresses in order to serve ads.
        6. Inadequate disclosure to schools/teachers. And Edmodo did not adequately inform teachers and schools that it was relying upon them to act as agents for obtaining parental consent. This information was “buried” in a paragraph on the bottom of the second page of the Terms of Service.

        The lesson learned today is that COPPA is alive and well and on the FTC’s radar. Glory, glory, hallelujah!

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...