You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        GLORY, GLORY, HALLELUJAH!

        by Robert Laplaca on May 23, 2023

        Remember that old parody of the Battle Hymn of the Republic we used to sing before there was an Internet? There are apparently many versions, but they all generally involve children inflicting various types of mayhem on their school and its staff.

        The kids of today are now equipped with the powerful COPPA Rule, 16 C.F.R. Part 312. And you can chalk one up for the kids when the FTC recently obtained a permanent injunction and $6 million penalty against an online education technology and virtual classroom provider in U.S. v. Edmodo, LLC, Case No. 3:23-cv-02495 (N.D. Cal. 2023). https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/202-3129-edmodo-llc-us-v

        We’re all familiar with, and frankly fearful of, COPPA, which was enacted in 1998 to protect the unauthorized or unnecessary collection of children’s personal information online. For a very brief review, the COPPA Rule requires operators of commercial websites or online services directed to children under 13 to have certain safeguards in place prior to collecting, using or disclosing personal information from children, such as their name, online contact information, telephone number, persistent identifier or image. These safeguards include:

        1. Providing clear, understandable and complete notice of its information practices;
        2. Making reasonable efforts to ensure parents receive direct notice;
        3. Obtaining verifiable parental consent prior to collecting, using or disclosing personal information from children; and
        4. Retaining personal information from children only as long as reasonably necessary to fulfill the purpose for which the information was collected.

        According to the FTC, the Edmodo Platform was an online service that allowed teachers to create a virtual classroom to share materials, give assignments and quizzes, organize events, and allow direct messaging with students and teachers. The free version allowed students and teachers to create accounts and the subscription version allowed schools. Both versions collected personal information about the students including their names, emails, dates of birth and phone numbers.

        The Edmodo Platform’s terms of service put the onus on the schools and teachers to obtain the requisite verifiable parental consent, which may be permissible in an educational context, but the FTC found fault in the following areas:

        1. Disclosure was not on sign-up page. The teacher sign-up page merely stated in small print at the bottom, “By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.”
        2. No express consent to terms and privacy policy at signup. Teachers were not required to click on the linked documents or review them before creating an account.
        3. Terms and privacy policy were cumbersome. The Terms of Service and Privacy Policy contained “a host of information unrelated to [Edmodo’s] collection, use and disclosure of personal information.”
        4. No direct notice to parents. The Privacy Policy could not serve as both direct notice to parents and online notice, both of which are separately required under the COPPA Rule.
        5. Information was used for non-educational purposes. Edmodo could not rely upon the school/teacher acting as agent exception to the COPPA Rule because Edmodo used student information for non-education commercial uses, by collecting persistent identifiers such as device IDs, cookies and IP addresses in order to serve ads.
        6. Inadequate disclosure to schools/teachers. And Edmodo did not adequately inform teachers and schools that it was relying upon them to act as agents for obtaining parental consent. This information was “buried” in a paragraph on the bottom of the second page of the Terms of Service.

        The lesson learned today is that COPPA is alive and well and on the FTC’s radar. Glory, glory, hallelujah!

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...