Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Handling Missing Participants under Code Section 409A

        April 15, 2019

        Deferred compensation payments are due to one of your former executives, but the former executive is nowhere to be found. You know that the IRS has strict timing rules for payments subject to Code Section 409A (but maybe not as strict as you think). The end of the tax year is approaching fast. What to do?

        Missing participants can be a problem for benefit plan sponsors in a variety of contexts. Sponsors of qualified plans can turn to IRS and DOL guidance on what do to when a missing participant is owed required minimum distributions or the plan is being terminated and assets must be distributed.

        For executive compensation arrangements subject to Section 409A, however, there is no clear guidance on how to handle missing participants. This presents a problem for employers when payments are due in one tax year, but the participant is not located until a later tax year, because it is unclear whether withholding and IRS reporting requirements must be fulfilled in the year the payment is due, even if no payment is actually made. And, Section 409A requires that deferred compensation may only be paid at prescribed times. If payments under a Section 409A plan are not being delivered because the participant can’t be located, there is a risk that when payments are finally made, they will be late and in violation of the Section 409A timing rules.

        One option is for the employer to treat the participant as being in constructive receipt of the payments, and report the payments to the IRS as if they were distributed to the participant. This may create issues down the road, however, if the participant is never located and questions arise about what to do with the money that was treated as distributed.

        Another solution is to suspend the payments until the participant is located and report the payments in the year they are distributed. In the absence of clear guidance, employers may be able to take this approach, so long as plan language, distribution forms, or administrative procedures require a participant to provide up-to-date contact information as a condition of payment, and the employer makes a reasonable effort to locate the participant. Accordingly, we suggest that employers update their plan documents, distribution forms, or administrative procedures along those lines.

        If a participant in a Section 409A plan goes missing, the employer should make reasonable efforts to locate the participant or an appropriate beneficiary by following the steps outlined in the DOL’s guidance on locating missing participants. The employer should maintain a record of the payment history, stale checks, and the efforts made to locate the participant. The search should be periodically renewed, but until the participant is found, the employer may suspend payments, relying on the provision in its plan requiring the participant to provide contact information prior to receiving payment.

        Although following the steps outlined above should protect the employer from risks associated with failing to make or report the payments, this will not necessarily protect the participant from excise taxes for receiving a distribution outside the periods allowed under Section 409A. In fact, the regulations suggest that the opposite is true, and a participant that misses payments due to the participant’s failure to provide up-to-date contact information will be subject to the penalty and premium interest taxes if the payments violate the timing rules of Section 409A when the payments are eventually made.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...