Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Handling Missing Participants under Code Section 409A

        April 15, 2019

        Deferred compensation payments are due to one of your former executives, but the former executive is nowhere to be found. You know that the IRS has strict timing rules for payments subject to Code Section 409A (but maybe not as strict as you think). The end of the tax year is approaching fast. What to do?

        Missing participants can be a problem for benefit plan sponsors in a variety of contexts. Sponsors of qualified plans can turn to IRS and DOL guidance on what do to when a missing participant is owed required minimum distributions or the plan is being terminated and assets must be distributed.

        For executive compensation arrangements subject to Section 409A, however, there is no clear guidance on how to handle missing participants. This presents a problem for employers when payments are due in one tax year, but the participant is not located until a later tax year, because it is unclear whether withholding and IRS reporting requirements must be fulfilled in the year the payment is due, even if no payment is actually made. And, Section 409A requires that deferred compensation may only be paid at prescribed times. If payments under a Section 409A plan are not being delivered because the participant can’t be located, there is a risk that when payments are finally made, they will be late and in violation of the Section 409A timing rules.

        One option is for the employer to treat the participant as being in constructive receipt of the payments, and report the payments to the IRS as if they were distributed to the participant. This may create issues down the road, however, if the participant is never located and questions arise about what to do with the money that was treated as distributed.

        Another solution is to suspend the payments until the participant is located and report the payments in the year they are distributed. In the absence of clear guidance, employers may be able to take this approach, so long as plan language, distribution forms, or administrative procedures require a participant to provide up-to-date contact information as a condition of payment, and the employer makes a reasonable effort to locate the participant. Accordingly, we suggest that employers update their plan documents, distribution forms, or administrative procedures along those lines.

        If a participant in a Section 409A plan goes missing, the employer should make reasonable efforts to locate the participant or an appropriate beneficiary by following the steps outlined in the DOL’s guidance on locating missing participants. The employer should maintain a record of the payment history, stale checks, and the efforts made to locate the participant. The search should be periodically renewed, but until the participant is found, the employer may suspend payments, relying on the provision in its plan requiring the participant to provide contact information prior to receiving payment.

        Although following the steps outlined above should protect the employer from risks associated with failing to make or report the payments, this will not necessarily protect the participant from excise taxes for receiving a distribution outside the periods allowed under Section 409A. In fact, the regulations suggest that the opposite is true, and a participant that misses payments due to the participant’s failure to provide up-to-date contact information will be subject to the penalty and premium interest taxes if the payments violate the timing rules of Section 409A when the payments are eventually made.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...