Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        IRS Modifies Health FSA Rules to Permit Carryover of up to $500

        November 4, 2013

        Late last week the IRS released Notice 2013-71, modifying the health flexible spending account (“health FSA”) use-it-or-lose-it rule to allow participants to carry over up to $500 in unused health FSA funds. Although not unexpected (the Service has hinted at such a change a number of times over the past year), this new feature is welcome relief to participants and plan sponsors. Plan sponsors may adopt this optional amendment effective as early as the 2013 plan year.

        Notice 2013-71 provides that a plan sponsor may, at its option, allow a participant to carry over up to $500 of unused health FSA funds to the immediately following plan year. Unused health FSA funds are those remaining at the end of the plan’s run-out period (if any), and do not count against the limit on participant salary reduction contributions. Accordingly, a participant could elect to contribute the full $2,500 (as indexed in future years) permitted by law and also carryover as much as $500.

        An employer wishing to adopt this new carryover feature must amend its health FSA plan to provide for the carryover and must eliminate any grace period if the plan has one. The use of a carryover option does not, however, limit an employer’s ability to allow for a claims run-out period. (A grace period is a period of up to two and one-half months following the end of a plan year during which a participant may use amounts remaining from the prior year to cover expenses incurred during the current plan year, while a claims run-out period provides participants with some amount of time following the end of a plan year to submit claims for expenses incurred during that prior plan year.) Thus, for a plan allowing both the new carryover option and a claims run-out period, a participant’s unused health FSA funds from the prior plan year may be used to reimburse expenses incurred both (a) during the prior plan year and submitted during the plan’s run-out period, and (b) during the current plan year. Of course, health FSA funds that accrue during the current plan year may be used only to reimburse expenses incurred during the current plan year, except to the extent that the current plan year funds may later be carried over into the following plan year. For ease of administration, a plan may, but is not required to, use current year contributions to reimburse expenses prior to tapping into health FSA funds carried over from the prior year.

        In general, a plan sponsor wishing to amend its plan to allow for carryover must adopt the amendment on or before the last day of the plan year from which amounts may be carried over, but for the 2013 plan year a plan sponsor wishing to allow carryover of 2013 balances into the 2014 plan year has until the last day of the 2014 plan year to adopt the amendment.

        An employer considering whether to adopt the new carryover feature for the 2013 plan year should assess whether there remains sufficient time to properly inform participants of the new feature and the elimination of any grace period prior to the completion of open enrollment elections. If the employer is confident that employees would receive communications regarding the change in time to make their elections and plan for the elimination of any grace period, then the employer could amend its plan to allow for the carryover of 2013 balances. If, however, there is doubt about whether employees would receive notice in time to make elections and deal with the elimination of the grace period, then it may be better to wait for the 2014 plan year to allow for the carryover.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...