Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        IRS Provides Helpful Answers Regarding Long-Term Part-Time Employees in 403(b) Plans

        by Eric D. Altholz on October 10, 2024

        In November 2023, the IRS issued proposed regulations addressing the SECURE 2.0 long-term part-time (LTPT) employee eligibility requirements applicable to 401(k) plans knowing that further guidance would be needed to explain how those requirements would apply to 403(b) plans—you can read our summary of the proposed regulations here. The publication of IRS Notice 2024-73 last week represents a significant step forward in delivering that guidance. All 403(b) plan sponsors will likely appreciate Notice 2024-73, but colleges, universities, and teaching hospitals may find it especially helpful. While Notice 2024-73 addresses several issues pertinent to 403(b) plans, this post will focus only on the treatment of part-time employees and student employees.

        Background

        Section 403(b) plans are subject to many of the same nondiscrimination rules that apply to 401(k) plans, but some special rules and exceptions also apply. Most notably, Code Section 403(b)(12)(A) requires 403(b) plans to satisfy a “universal availability” requirement. Under the universal availability requirement, all employees of an employer sponsoring a 403(b) plan must be allowed to make elective deferrals if any employee of the employer is allowed to make elective deferrals. However, as most 403(b) plan sponsors know, there are two significant exceptions to the universal availability requirement. Specifically, a 403(b) plan may exclude student employees and employees who normally work less than 20 hours per week without violating the universal availability requirement. In the days following the enactment of SECURE 2.0, which expanded the application of the LTPT employee eligibility requirements to 403(b) plans, many practitioners wondered whether or how those exceptions could survive. Notice 2024-73 confirms that student employees and certain part-time employees can still be excluded from a 403(b) plan.

        Excluding Part-Time Employees and Student Employees under Notice 2024-73

        After explaining that the LTPT employee eligibility requirements do not apply to non-ERISA 403(b) plans but do apply to ERISA 403(b) plans, the Notice confirms that a 403(b) plan may: (1) exclude part-time employees who do not qualify as LTPT employees without violating the “consistency requirement” under the Section 403(b) nondiscrimination rules (explained below); and (2) exclude student employees even if they would otherwise qualify as LTPT employees.

        Although the long-standing exclusion for employees who normally work less than 20 hours per week is no longer viable in light of the LTPT employee eligibility requirement, part-time employees who are unable to achieve LTPT employee status (i.e., those part-time employees who are not credited with at least 500 hours of service in each of two consecutive 12-month periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023) can still be excluded from a 403(b) plan. Before the issuance of Notice 2024-73, 403(b) plan sponsors and practitioners were concerned that any distinction between different categories of part-time employees would run afoul of the “consistency requirement” of Treasury Regulations Section 1.403(b)-5(b)(4)(i). Under the consistency requirement, if a 403(b) plan permissibly excludes a given class of employees, it must do so uniformly. Therefore, if a 403(b) plan permissibly excludes part-time employees, it cannot allow some part-time employees to participate while excluding other part-time employees. Notice 2024-73 confirms that a 403(b) plan may exclude part-time employees who do not qualify as LTPT employees, and it notes that the consistency requirement under the regulation will be updated accordingly. See Q&A 3 of the Notice.

        Regarding student employees, the Notice explains that this statutory exclusion under Code Section 403(b)(12)(A) continues to be valid because it is based on a classification of employees – students performing services described in Code Section 3121(b)(10) – rather than on service or work schedules. Therefore, the Notice confirms that student employees may be excluded from a 403(b) plan regardless of whether the student employee may qualify as an LTPT employee. See Q&A-4 of the Notice. This will come as welcome news for colleges, universities, teaching hospitals, and other educational organizations that have historically excluded student employees from their 403(b) plans.

        Effective Dates

        Notice 2024-73 applies for plan years beginning after December 31, 2024, just in time to help 403(b) plan sponsors identify the first group of LTPT employees who may be eligible to make elect deferrals under their plans. The Notice also states that final regulations governing the application of the LTPT employee eligibility requirement to 401(k) plans will apply no earlier than plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.

        If you have questions about the application of the LTPT employee eligibility requirements to a 401(k) plan or 403(b) plan, please contact ealtholz@verrill-law.com or any member of the Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation group with whom you work.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...