You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Madness or Badness: Is Your Office NCAA Pool Illegal?

        by Robert Laplaca on March 20, 2015

        It doesn’t matter whether you know a basketball from a hockey puck or a three-point play from a five course meal, every March, office works across the country dutifully fill out their NCAA basketball tournament pool brackets, kick in five dollars, and hope against hope that their months-long lack of interest in college hoops is somehow an advantage in selecting the winners in 67 games. Does anyone stop to ask whether this office bracket challenge is even legal?

        The answer is not a simple one. In a traditional office pool where each entrant pays to play and the winners share the pot, the answer depends on your state’s gambling laws. In most states, these pools would be considered illegal. But some state statutes actually carve out an exception where the “house” is not taking a cut of the entry fees or where it is incidental to a bona fide social relationship. For example, in Connecticut, “gambling” includes risking money for gain contingent upon chance. By statute, gambling is a criminal misdemeanor except if it involves natural persons and is not considered “professional gambling.” The term “professional gambling” is defined as collecting money “for profit,” that is, keeping some of the money wagered by the participants. The Connecticut gambling statute also expressly carves out an exception for a pool run by a natural person, involving natural persons, “which is incidental to a bona fide social relationship.” Arguably, a typical office pool would be included within this exception too. Maine similarly carves out “social gambling”, which includes activities where the participants only receive their personal gambling winnings and the person running the pool does not receive any profits.

        You must also consider whether an office pool is an illegal lottery under state law. Traditionally, a lottery involves three elements: prize, chance and consideration. One of these elements must be taken out to be acceptable. Companies running sweepstakes typically remove the consideration element and allow entries with “no purchase necessary.” Skill contests are also exempt by taking out the chance element and the winners are selected based on a defined skill. The question here would be whether selecting the winners in an NCAA tournament pool is considered a skill. The federal government has specifically recognized that a multi-game activity, such as a fantasy sports league, can involve skill, that is, the more skilled players are better able to select winners over time. An argument can be made that this applies to a 67-game basketball tournament too, but as we all know, it isn’t unusual for that worker who never watched a college basketball game all year to win the office pool.

        Thankfully, government authorities are not known to knock down your office doors to haul away the staff – if they were, the national GDP would drop precipitously. But there is one government agency that does care – the IRS. Yes, winnings from an office pool are taxable and must be declared. If you are concerned, check with your local state laws and keep the pool local, small, and on paper because there are at least three Federal laws that may prohibit online pay-to-play pools. Good luck on your pool (and possibly evading the law!).

        If you have any questions about whether your company’s external promotional activities comply with state or federal law, please contact Rob Laplaca at rlaplaca@verrill-law.com. For questions about how to manage your employees’ productivity (or lack thereof) during March Madness, contact a member of Verrill Dana’s Labor & Employment Department.

         

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...