You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Madness or Badness: Is Your Office NCAA Pool Illegal?

        by Robert Laplaca on March 20, 2015

        It doesn’t matter whether you know a basketball from a hockey puck or a three-point play from a five course meal, every March, office works across the country dutifully fill out their NCAA basketball tournament pool brackets, kick in five dollars, and hope against hope that their months-long lack of interest in college hoops is somehow an advantage in selecting the winners in 67 games. Does anyone stop to ask whether this office bracket challenge is even legal?

        The answer is not a simple one. In a traditional office pool where each entrant pays to play and the winners share the pot, the answer depends on your state’s gambling laws. In most states, these pools would be considered illegal. But some state statutes actually carve out an exception where the “house” is not taking a cut of the entry fees or where it is incidental to a bona fide social relationship. For example, in Connecticut, “gambling” includes risking money for gain contingent upon chance. By statute, gambling is a criminal misdemeanor except if it involves natural persons and is not considered “professional gambling.” The term “professional gambling” is defined as collecting money “for profit,” that is, keeping some of the money wagered by the participants. The Connecticut gambling statute also expressly carves out an exception for a pool run by a natural person, involving natural persons, “which is incidental to a bona fide social relationship.” Arguably, a typical office pool would be included within this exception too. Maine similarly carves out “social gambling”, which includes activities where the participants only receive their personal gambling winnings and the person running the pool does not receive any profits.

        You must also consider whether an office pool is an illegal lottery under state law. Traditionally, a lottery involves three elements: prize, chance and consideration. One of these elements must be taken out to be acceptable. Companies running sweepstakes typically remove the consideration element and allow entries with “no purchase necessary.” Skill contests are also exempt by taking out the chance element and the winners are selected based on a defined skill. The question here would be whether selecting the winners in an NCAA tournament pool is considered a skill. The federal government has specifically recognized that a multi-game activity, such as a fantasy sports league, can involve skill, that is, the more skilled players are better able to select winners over time. An argument can be made that this applies to a 67-game basketball tournament too, but as we all know, it isn’t unusual for that worker who never watched a college basketball game all year to win the office pool.

        Thankfully, government authorities are not known to knock down your office doors to haul away the staff – if they were, the national GDP would drop precipitously. But there is one government agency that does care – the IRS. Yes, winnings from an office pool are taxable and must be declared. If you are concerned, check with your local state laws and keep the pool local, small, and on paper because there are at least three Federal laws that may prohibit online pay-to-play pools. Good luck on your pool (and possibly evading the law!).

        If you have any questions about whether your company’s external promotional activities comply with state or federal law, please contact Rob Laplaca at rlaplaca@verrill-law.com. For questions about how to manage your employees’ productivity (or lack thereof) during March Madness, contact a member of Verrill Dana’s Labor & Employment Department.

         

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...