Taking Care of HR Business
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Myth Buster: If Your Company Receives Federal Funds the Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandated Obligations Does Not Automatically Apply

        by Tawny L. Alvarez on October 8, 2021

        This is the second in a series of posts from Verrill with the purpose of helping to dispel myths that are currently circulating concerning employment laws and rules related to COVID-19.

        On September 24, the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force issued draft Guidance for Federal Contractors entitled COVID-19 Workplace Safety: Guidance for Federal Contractors and Subcontractors. On September 30, 20201, the GSA Office of Governmentwide Policy issued CAAC 2021-03 Memorandum for Civilian Agencies with the Subject: Class Deviation from the Federal Acquisition Regulation Regarding Implementation of Executive Order 14042, Ensuring Adequate COVID Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors. A copy of that document is available here. These two documents provide the main sources of information concerning federal contractor obligations as they relate to the vaccine mandate.

        One myth we are hearing repeated by several friends and clients is that because the entity receives federal funds, they are bound by the obligations that have been communicated by the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force. This is not true. Instead, the rule applies only to employers who enter into Contract and Contract-Like Instruments.

        What is a Contract or Contract-Like Instrument? As of October 8, 2021 (because the definition in use was created July 22, 2021 and is subject to change once the Department of Labor (DOL) issues a final rule related to the increase of minimum wage for federal contractors), this phrase means:

        An agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law. This definition includes, but is not limited to, a mutually binding legal relationship obligating one party to furnish services (including construction) and another party to pay for them. The proposed definition of the term contract broadly includes all contracts and any subcontracts of any tier thereunder, whether negotiated or advertised, including any procurement actions, lease agreements, cooperative agreements, provider agreements, intergovernmental service agreements, service agreements, licenses, permits, or any other type of agreement, regardless of nomenclature, type, or particular form, and whether entered into verbally or in writing.

        86 Fed. Reg. 38,816, 38,887 (July 22, 2021). The Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, however, notes the following with the definition:

        This definition includes, but is not limited to, a mutually binding legal relationship obligating one party to furnish services (including construction) and another party to pay for them. The term contract includes all contracts and any subcontracts of any tier thereunder, whether negotiated or advertised, including any procurement actions, lease agreements, cooperative agreements, provider agreements, intergovernmental service agreements, service agreements, licenses, permits, or any other type of agreement, regardless of nomenclature, type, or particular form, and whether entered into verbally or in writing. The term contract shall be interpreted broadly as to include, but not be limited to, any contract within the definition provided in the FAR at 48 CFR chapter 1 or applicable Federal statutes. This definition includes, but is not limited to, any contract that may be covered under any Federal procurement statute. Contracts may be the result of competitive bidding or awarded to a single source under applicable authority to do so. In addition to bilateral instruments, contracts include, but are not limited to, awards and notices of awards; job orders or task letters issued under basic ordering agreements; letter contracts; orders, such as purchase orders, under which the contract becomes effective by written acceptance or performance; exercised contract options; and bilateral contract modifications. The term contract includes contracts covered by the Service Contract Act, contracts covered by the Davis-Bacon Act, concessions contracts not otherwise subject to the Service Contract Act, and contracts in connection with Federal property or land and related to offering services for Federal employees, their dependents, or the general public.

        Definition of Contract and Contract-Like Instrument, COVID-19 Workplace Safety: Guidance for Federal Contractors and Subcontractors (last accessed October 8, 2021).

        Does This Include Entities That Receive Medicaid or Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) Funds? Not currently, but other obligations may be applicable under forthcoming CMS mandates. The Department of Labor has indicated that federal grants under Medicaid or under the CWSRF and contracts entered into by state or local governments to administer Medicaid or CWSRF programs are outside the scope of the definition of contract or contract-like instrument.

        Does This Include Contracts Under the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act? Maybe. I know that’s not an ideal answer. The Department of Labor has noted that “contracts for the manufacturing or furnishing of materials, supplies, articles, or equipment to the Federal Government [subject to the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act], are not covered” by President Obama’s Executive Order 13658, which provides the definition of contract or contract-like instrument for purposes of current EO 14042.

        In the text of EO 14042 (related to COVID-19 mandates), it notes that the order shall not apply to:
        (i) grants;
        (ii) contracts, contract-like instruments, or agreements with Indian Tribes under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Public Law 93-638), as amended;
        (iii) contracts or subcontracts whose value is equal to or less than the simplified acquisition threshold, as that term is defined in section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation;
        (iv) employees who perform work outside the United States or its outlying areas, as those terms are defined in section 2.101 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation; or
        (v) subcontracts solely for the provision of products.

        Executive Order 14042(5)(b). Okay, so two reliable sources appear to indicate that subcontracts solely for the provision of products are excluded. But in the definition section of COVID-19 Workplace Safety: Guidance for Federal Contractors and Subcontractors, the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force extends the definition by noting “This definition includes, but is not limited to, any contract that may be covered under any Federal procurement statute.” In the Guidance provided by the SFWTF, the following language is included: “Consistent with applicable law, agencies are strongly encouraged to incorporate a clause requiring compliance with this Guidance into contracts that are not covered or directly addressed by the order because the contract is under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold as defined in Section 2.101 of the FAR or is a contract or subcontract for the manufacturing of products.” As a result, each agency will have the ability to determine whether this clause is included in the contract for the manufacturing of products.

        This information is current as of October 8, 2021. For more information, please contact Tawny Alvarez or another member of Verrill’s Employment and Labor Practice Group.

        Taking Care of HR Business

        Human resource professionals, supervisors, and company executives are constantly confronted with a changing legal landscape. Verrill’s Taking Care of HR Business blog is designed to keep you informed about the latest and most significant legal developments that affect employers.

        Key Contact

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...
        Media Mentions

        Martha Gaythwaite Featured in Portland Press Herald Coverage of Sig Sauer Trial Victory

        Verrill attorney Martha Gaythwaite was highlighted in media coverage of a federal trial in Bangor involving firearm manufacturer Sig Sauer. As...
        Media Mentions

        Law360 Quotes Robert Keach on Senate Bill Affecting Small Business Restructurings

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article discussing federal legislation that would permanently restore the $7.5 million...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SAFEs and Preferred Stock – Key Deal Terms Every Founder Should Know

        SAFEs Before negotiating a term sheet for preferred stock, many early-stage companies, particularly at the seed stage, first raise capital through...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Business Restructuring and Insolvency Attorney Nimra Tariq

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Nimra Tariq has joined the firm’s Business Restructuring and Insolvency Group as an...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Provides Commentary on First Brands Restructuring in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was quoted in the Law360 article, "First Brands' Ch. 11 Plan Revives Angst Over Admin Claims," discussing First Brands...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Construction Attorney Cassie Dufon

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to welcome Cassie Dufon to the firm’s Construction Group as an Associate, resident in the firm’s Portland...
        Press Releases

        Verrill’s Wide-Ranging Private Wealth Law Practice Recognized in 2026 Chambers and Partners High Net Worth Guide

        BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine and BOSTON, Mass. – Verrill attorneys Kenneth P. Brier, Anya F. Endsley, Kurt E. Klebe, Mary McQuillen, Nathaniel S....
        Blog

        Update on Status of Maine Packaging EPR

        In December 2024, Verrill published a blog post, Unwrapping Maine's Gift to the Environment: A New Packaging Stewardship Program Set to Launch in...