Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        New Disability Claims Procedures Affect Retirement Plans and Deferred Compensation Plans Too

        by Eric D. Altholz on August 7, 2018

        Much has been written about the Department of Labor’s final rule regarding disability benefit claims procedures (the “Final Rule”), which took effect on April 2, 2018. And by now, most employers – and all disability insurance carriers – have taken steps to implement changes in disability plan administrative procedures and plan documents necessary to comply with the Final Rule. However, many employers have been somewhat slower to react to the implications of the Final Rule for their retirement plans and deferred compensation plans that include a benefit or payment based on disability. Plan sponsors generally have until December 31, 2018 (for calendar year plans) to adopt amendments that would be retroactively effective to April 2, 2018. Plan sponsors should take the time now to determine whether their retirement plans and deferred compensation plans may be affected by the Final Rule.

        Summary of Key Requirements

        The Final Rule is designed to harmonize the rules that apply to the processing of disability claims under ERISA with the claims administration requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. In order to accomplish this, the Final Rule prescribes a number of new requirements for determinations of disability under an ERISA plan. These new requirements include the following:

        • mandatory independent claims review;
        • an additional opportunity for claimants to review and respond to new information or rationales applied by a claims administrator to deny a claim;
        • new content requirements for benefit denial notices;
        • treatment of certain rescissions of coverage as denials of benefits that may trigger the appeal process; and
        • the provision of English language assistance where necessary.

        If a covered plan fails to follow these new procedures, a participant whose disability-related claim has been denied will generally be deemed to have exhausted her administrative remedies and may immediately file a lawsuit to recover benefits.

        It goes without saying that short-term and long-term disability plans subject to ERISA must comply with these new rules because all claims for benefits under such plans turn on a determination of a participant’s disability. However, the Final Rule also applies to 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, and other retirement plans, as well as many deferred compensation plans.

        How the Final Rule Applies to Retirement Plans and Deferred Compensation Plans

        One of the policy goals of the Final Rule is to ensure that all plans subject to ERISA make determinations of disability either (1) by applying objective criteria that do not require the exercise of discretion by the plan sponsor or plan administrator or (2) in compliance with the rigorous procedural requirements of the Final Rule if discretion must be exercised. Accordingly, a retirement plan that includes disability-related vesting, benefit calculation, or benefit payment terms must comply with the Final Rule either by eliminating administrative discretion in disability determinations or by following the new claims procedures.

        A retirement plan that determines a participant’s “disability” by requiring that the participant be entitled to benefits under the employer’s long term disability plan or qualify for Social Security disability benefits does not have to be amended to comply with the Final Rule. Under such a plan, the retirement plan administrator exercises no discretion in determining the disability status of the participant. However, a retirement plan under which the plan sponsor or plan administrator must itself determine a participant’s disability either will have to adopt a new definition of disability that eliminates all discretion or adjust its claims procedures to comply with the Final Rule. This is true even if the plan refers to seemingly objective disability standards but requires the retirement plan administrator to make the determination whether a participant is disabled in accordance with the standards.

        In addition, the Department of Labor has confirmed that the Final Rule applies to deferred compensation plans – even a plan that is considered a “top hat” plan. Therefore, plan sponsors should review their deferred compensation plans applying the foregoing principles in order to determine whether those plans must be amended in order to comply with the Final Rule. (Certain deferred compensation plans known as “excess plans” are fully exempt from the Final Rule.) Note that a definition of disability that follows the safe harbor language provided in the regulations under Code Section 409A typically still requires an exercise of discretion by the plan administrator and is not sufficient to avoid adoption of the disability claims procedures under the Final Rule.

        Two Ways to Comply

        For retirement plans and deferred compensation plans whose definition of “disability” gives the plan administrator discretion to make the disability determination, there are two ways to comply with the Final Rule. First, the plan’s definition of “disability” may be amended to require determinations of disability to be made by reference to an impartial objective standard (under which the plan administrator cannot exercise any discretion). Under this approach, the definition of “disability” could be amended to provide that a participant is disabled only if she has been determined to be disabled under the plan sponsor’s long-term disability plan or by the Social Security Administration. Alternatively, the plan’s definition of disability could remain as is, provided the plan is amended to incorporate the disability claims procedures prescribed by the Final Rule.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Alerts and Newsletters

        Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law, 26 M.R.S. § 620-A

        Effective July 14, 2026 Maine employers that electronically monitor employees must comply with a new disclosure law effective July 14, 2026. Under...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Recognized by U.S. News as One of the Best Law Firms to Work for in 2026

        BOSTON, Mass., BANGOR and PORTLAND, Maine, GREENWICH and WESTPORT, Conn., – Verrill has been featured on U.S. News’ 2026 Best Companies to Work...
        Blog

        SECURE 2.0 Roth Catch-Up Rules and the 403(b) 15-Year Catch-Up: What Tax-Exempt Employers Need to Know

        Tax-exempt employers whose 403(b) plans offer catch-up contributions for participants age 50 and above should be well on their way to compliance with...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Quoted in Law360 on SIMAD Summer Camp Bankruptcy Sale

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving SIMAD Holdings and...
        Media Mentions

        Chris Tsouros Featured in Law360’s Coverage of Sports Real Estate Deals

        Verrill Partner Chris Tsouros was recently recognized in a Law360 article highlighting law firms involved in significant sports real estate projects...
        Blog

        What Maine’s New Employer Surveillance Law Means for Maine Employers

        Maine employers who monitor their workforce, whether through productivity software, GPS, call recording, or cameras, have a new compliance obligation...
        Blog

        Run Don’t Walk: The Implication of “While Supplies Last” Prize Promotions

        This month a big-chain grocery store has been offering daily mystery boxes during specific timed drops on a first-come, first-served basis, to users...
        Blog

        Maine’s Noncompete Statute is Reshaped for Health Care Workers: What You Need to Know

        Employers of individuals who are licensed under state law to perform, or provide, health care services in the State of Maine should be prepared for...
        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...