Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Order of Benefit Deductions from Employee Pay

        February 17, 2021

        From time to time, we field questions about the order in which deductions for various employee benefits (e.g., 401(k) plan elective deferrals and insurance premiums for welfare benefit plan benefits) should be taken from an employee’s pay. The questions range from whether ERISA mandates a specific order to what happens to a participant’s 401(k) plan deferral election when gross pay is not sufficient to permit all benefit deductions.

        Some employers may view medical and other welfare benefit plan benefits (particularly during a pandemic) as a higher priority than 401(k) plan elective deferrals. Accordingly, they program their payroll system to take employee contributions for all welfare benefit plan benefits first (e.g., premiums for medical, dental, disability, and life insurance, and health care reimbursement account contributions), with pre-tax employee contributions typically preceding post-tax employee contributions, then 401(k) plan loan payments, and then 401(k) plan elective deferrals. Other employers may prioritize retirement savings and, accordingly, program payroll to take 401(k) plan loan payments and elective deferrals before any welfare benefit plan deductions.

        Bottom line: Nothing in ERISA mandates a specific order for benefit deductions, and we are not aware of any U.S. Department of Labor or Treasury rules or other formal guidance on this topic applicable to private sector employers.[1] In the absence of such rules or guidance, we have advised that employers are free to establish their own internal policy governing the order of benefit deductions and should consistently apply it.

        As for the ordering of 401(k) plan loan payments and 401(k) elective deferrals, we think loan payments should be taken prior to elective deferrals to minimize the potential for default (and consequent deemed distribution of the outstanding loan balance for federal income tax purposes should the participant fail to make a missed loan payment by the end of the plan’s cure period).

        Employers should take care, however, to ensure that their internal policy governing the order of benefit deductions does not inadvertently create an operational failure with respect to their 401(k) plan.

        Example: Employee X’s weekly gross pay is $1,000, and the definition of “pay” for purposes of making elective deferrals under the 401(k) plan is gross pay. Employee X has an outstanding loan from the 401(k) plan, and the weekly loan payment amount is $400. Employee X’s deductions for various welfare benefit plan benefits total $500 per week, and Employee X has a 401(k) plan deferral election (pre-tax) of 20% in effect.

        No matter the order in which the loan payment, elective deferrals, and welfare benefit plan deductions are taken, under the terms of the 401(k) plan, $200 (20% x $1,000) should be withheld from the employee’s gross pay and contributed to the 401(k) plan as a pre-tax elective deferral. If the 401(k) loan payment ($400) and the deductions for welfare benefit plan benefits ($500) are taken first, the remaining cash from Employee X’s weekly gross pay ($100) will not be sufficient to permit the full amount of elective deferrals ($200) to be made to the 401(k) plan, and there will be a 401(k) plan operational failure (i.e., a failure to implement Employee X’s deferral election).

        To avoid the 401(k) plan operational failure illustrated in the example, we recommend that the plan administrator of the 401(k) plan adopt a written administrative rule (1) referencing the employer’s policy governing the order of benefit deductions, and (2) providing that in the event the employee’s gross pay for a payroll period is not sufficient to implement the employee’s 401(k) plan deferral election, the employee’s deferral election will be reduced automatically for such payroll period to 0%, or, if greater, the percentage that can be supported by the employee’s remaining gross pay for such payroll period. Similarly, it may be appropriate for an employer to establish a written policy relating to its Code Section 125 cafeteria plan that addresses what happens to benefit elections under that plan when gross pay is not sufficient to permit all deductions.

        Please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have questions relating to the order of benefit deductions from an employee’s pay.


        [1] Interestingly, in 2008 the United States Office of Personnel Management issued an Order of Precedence When Gross Pay Is Not Sufficient to Permit All Deductions that applies to civilian Federal employees. The Thrift Savings Plan contributions referenced at item 11.h. of the Order of Precedence are analogous to 401(k) plan elective deferrals.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...