Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Order of Benefit Deductions from Employee Pay

        February 17, 2021

        From time to time, we field questions about the order in which deductions for various employee benefits (e.g., 401(k) plan elective deferrals and insurance premiums for welfare benefit plan benefits) should be taken from an employee’s pay. The questions range from whether ERISA mandates a specific order to what happens to a participant’s 401(k) plan deferral election when gross pay is not sufficient to permit all benefit deductions.

        Some employers may view medical and other welfare benefit plan benefits (particularly during a pandemic) as a higher priority than 401(k) plan elective deferrals. Accordingly, they program their payroll system to take employee contributions for all welfare benefit plan benefits first (e.g., premiums for medical, dental, disability, and life insurance, and health care reimbursement account contributions), with pre-tax employee contributions typically preceding post-tax employee contributions, then 401(k) plan loan payments, and then 401(k) plan elective deferrals. Other employers may prioritize retirement savings and, accordingly, program payroll to take 401(k) plan loan payments and elective deferrals before any welfare benefit plan deductions.

        Bottom line: Nothing in ERISA mandates a specific order for benefit deductions, and we are not aware of any U.S. Department of Labor or Treasury rules or other formal guidance on this topic applicable to private sector employers.[1] In the absence of such rules or guidance, we have advised that employers are free to establish their own internal policy governing the order of benefit deductions and should consistently apply it.

        As for the ordering of 401(k) plan loan payments and 401(k) elective deferrals, we think loan payments should be taken prior to elective deferrals to minimize the potential for default (and consequent deemed distribution of the outstanding loan balance for federal income tax purposes should the participant fail to make a missed loan payment by the end of the plan’s cure period).

        Employers should take care, however, to ensure that their internal policy governing the order of benefit deductions does not inadvertently create an operational failure with respect to their 401(k) plan.

        Example: Employee X’s weekly gross pay is $1,000, and the definition of “pay” for purposes of making elective deferrals under the 401(k) plan is gross pay. Employee X has an outstanding loan from the 401(k) plan, and the weekly loan payment amount is $400. Employee X’s deductions for various welfare benefit plan benefits total $500 per week, and Employee X has a 401(k) plan deferral election (pre-tax) of 20% in effect.

        No matter the order in which the loan payment, elective deferrals, and welfare benefit plan deductions are taken, under the terms of the 401(k) plan, $200 (20% x $1,000) should be withheld from the employee’s gross pay and contributed to the 401(k) plan as a pre-tax elective deferral. If the 401(k) loan payment ($400) and the deductions for welfare benefit plan benefits ($500) are taken first, the remaining cash from Employee X’s weekly gross pay ($100) will not be sufficient to permit the full amount of elective deferrals ($200) to be made to the 401(k) plan, and there will be a 401(k) plan operational failure (i.e., a failure to implement Employee X’s deferral election).

        To avoid the 401(k) plan operational failure illustrated in the example, we recommend that the plan administrator of the 401(k) plan adopt a written administrative rule (1) referencing the employer’s policy governing the order of benefit deductions, and (2) providing that in the event the employee’s gross pay for a payroll period is not sufficient to implement the employee’s 401(k) plan deferral election, the employee’s deferral election will be reduced automatically for such payroll period to 0%, or, if greater, the percentage that can be supported by the employee’s remaining gross pay for such payroll period. Similarly, it may be appropriate for an employer to establish a written policy relating to its Code Section 125 cafeteria plan that addresses what happens to benefit elections under that plan when gross pay is not sufficient to permit all deductions.

        Please contact a member of our Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group if you have questions relating to the order of benefit deductions from an employee’s pay.


        [1] Interestingly, in 2008 the United States Office of Personnel Management issued an Order of Precedence When Gross Pay Is Not Sufficient to Permit All Deductions that applies to civilian Federal employees. The Thrift Savings Plan contributions referenced at item 11.h. of the Order of Precedence are analogous to 401(k) plan elective deferrals.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What Employee Benefits Lawyers Do (and How to Make the Best Use of Us)

        What do employee benefits lawyers do all day and how can clients make the best use of them? This post offers an overview of the kinds of things...
        Media Mentions

        Bloomberg Law Quotes Robert Keach on Expanded Access to Small Business Reorganization

        Verrill attorney Bob Keach was recently featured in Bloomberg Law, discussing legislation that would raise debt limits for bankruptcy relief and...
        Blog

        Phil Bartlett to Step Down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission

        On September 15, 2026, Governor Janet Mills announced that Phil Bartlett will step down as Chair of the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC)...
        Published Works

        Jay McCormack and Michael Fee Co-Author AHLA Article on Skin Substitute Enforcement Trends

        Verrill Partners Jay McCormack and Michael Fee co-authored an article for the American Health Law Association's Fraud and Abuse Practice Group...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Health Care & Life Sciences Attorney Elpida Velmahos

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to announce that Elpida Velmahos has joined the firm’s Health Care & Life Sciences Group as an...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Litigation & Trial Attorney Emma Pooler

        PORTLAND, Maine – Verrill is pleased to announce that Emma Pooler has joined the firm’s Litigation & Trial Group as an Associate, resident in...
        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...