You Might Be a Winner
        A blog from the attorneys of Verrill

        Playing for Keeps: Daily Fantasy Football 2016

        by Robert Laplaca on September 7, 2016

        When the last online fantasy football game was played, the attorneys general of New York, Nevada and Illinois were throwing penalty flags, state legislators was huddling to set the next play, and the daily fantasy sports leagues were taking it on the chin.

        Where are we now? Here’s a 50 state survey:

        DFS expressly allowed: CO, IN, KS, MD, MA, MS, MO, NY, RI, TN, WV, VA

        Contested: AL, DE, GA, HI, ID, IL, NV, SD, TX

        Banned: AZ, IO, LA, MT, WA

        Proposed legislation: CA, CT, FL, KY, MI, MN, NE, NJ, NM, OK, PA, SC, WI

        No legislation: AS, AK, ME, NH, NC, ND, OH, OR, UT, WY

        How about this stat: leading up to the 2015 NFL season, daily fantasy sports leagues spent over $750 million in ads – more than the entire beer industry. In 2015, the top two companies had recorded a combined $3 billion in player entry fees. Now, valuations of these companies have purportedly been halved, and they had been spending as much as $1 million per week on legal fees to stay alive.

        Lesson: don’t poke the bear. There is a certain amount of risk taking that may be present whenever a novel promotional program is begun. The online fantasy sports industry had the 2006 Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act in its pocket, with a nice carve-out for season-long fantasy leagues. While the Act was silent with regard to daily activity, an argument could be made in its favor. Combined with a legitimate skill v. chance argument, DFS had some footing. But bombarding the airways with commercials every 90 seconds during football season hyping millions of dollars in quick winnings may have been just too much too soon for regulators to take sitting down.

        State and federal regulators are generally not scouring the country looking for picayune promotion violations. But regulators may take notice of hugely popular and hugely lucrative programs. Would anyone care if Ed McMahon was knocking on your door with a $10 check? But make it a $10 million jumbo-sized check and it gets attention – see the 1999 Federal Deceptive Mail Prevention and Enforcement Act.

        Add to the popularity of DFS the fact that it hits squarely on the public’s “gambling instinct” and you may have trouble. It’s always easier to be a Monday morning quarterback, but the middle linebacker-sized hits taken by the DFS leagues could possibly been at least deflected by following this simple anagram: LION

        Learn the legal nuisances and do a fifty state and federal law survey. For example, which states use a “predominant” test for contests, which require a “stake” or “bet” for gambling.

        Identify the problem states. There will be some states where it will be clearly illegal and others where you may have some leeway.

        Options – consider the available options for dealing with questionable states. Perhaps you forgo entry fees or limit the available ways to play in some states.

        Navigate your advertising carefully. Highlight the “skill” aspects of the game along with the simple enjoyment of participating, while de-emphasizing the ability to win quick money.

        The LION rules can be applied to all promotions. And to those of you who follow them, a hearty “Roar Lion Roar” – a fight song dear to my heart.

        You Might Be a Winner

        Promotion and sweepstakes laws vary widely across the fifty states and under federal regulations, creating complex challenges for today’s innovative marketers. This blog explores the latest updates and trends in promotion and marketing law, offering practical insights to help brands stay compliant while pushing creative boundaries. We’ll also discuss noteworthy, questionable, and groundbreaking promotional campaigns to encourage thoughtful discussion among marketing and legal professionals.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...
        Published Works

        Francesco De Vito Authors Article in the Journal of the American College of Mortgage Attorneys

        Verrill Partner Frank De Vito authored an article featured in the Spring 2026 issue of The Abstract, the journal of the American College of Mortgage...