Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Seasonal Workers and Your Employee Benefit Plans

        May 7, 2013

        Summer is fast approaching and we find ourselves answering a number of questions regarding the coverage of seasonal workers in employee benefit plans. For employers planning to ramp up hiring for the summer season we offer this brief review of the treatment of seasonal employees for purposes of your employee benefit plans, with emphasis on issues under the Affordable Care Act.

        Health Plans

        The Affordable Care Act requires “large employers” to offer affordable health care coverage to all full-time employees and their children (but not their spouses) beginning with the first plan year on or after January 1, 2014, or pay a penalty. For this purpose, a “large employer” is an employer that employed an average of 50 or more full-time employees or full-time equivalent employees during the preceding year. A “full-time employee” is an individual who is employed an average of at least 30 hours per week or 130 hours per month. “Full-time equivalent employees” (FTEs) are calculated by taking the aggregate number of service hours of non-full time employees during the month and dividing by 120. Importantly, the number of full-time employees and FTEs is determined on a controlled group basis, so all individuals employed by the organizations that are members of the controlled group (for example, a parent company and its subsidiaries) are treated as being employed by a single employer.

        All employees, even those who may only work for part of the year, must be included in the count of full-time employees unless they truly are “seasonal” and fall within the fairly narrow definition provided under long-standing Department of Labor regulation 29 CFR § 502.10(b)(3)(ii)(A), as amplified by 26 USC § 4980H(c)(2)(B)(ii). (Guidance issued by both IRS and DOL under the Affordable Care Act confirms that these regulations continue to application and there is no indication that they regulations are likely to be revised in the near future.) Under proposed IRS regulations an employee may be considered a seasonal employee and disregarded for purposes of the head count if he or she: (1) was employed for no more than 120 days (or four months) during the preceding calendar year; and (2) performed labor of a type that is exclusively performed during certain periods or seasons and is not of a type performed continuously during the year. Under this definition blueberry pickers and retail employees employed exclusively during the holiday season should be considered seasonal employees, but extra wait staff hired by a year round restaurant during the high season generally will not. We recommend that any employer with a non-seasonal workforce (including FTEs) of 50 or fewer individuals take a close look at the rules regarding seasonal workers because it may be able to avoid large employer status by applying the seasonal employee exclusion.For further information about how these rules work, we recommend this set of Questions and Answers published by the IRS.

        Remember that temporary and part time employees are counted only for purposes of determining how many FTEs an employer has (and, therefore, will affect the determination of large employer status). They need not, however, be offered health insurance coverage (because they are not full-time employees) and they are not counted in computing the penalty.

        Retirement Plans

        Seasonal employee participation in a company’s retirement plans depends upon the terms of the plan. In general and as explained in an oft-cited IRS Field Directive from 1994, a plan may not include a blanket exclusion of part-time, temporary, or seasonal employees. That is because such employees could very easily accumulate the number of hours of service required for participation. Therefore, if a seasonal employee works the minimum hours required by the plan during the year (typically 1,000 hours) then he or she may be eligible for participation unless some other non-hours based exclusion applies.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...