Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Seasonal Workers and Your Employee Benefit Plans

        May 7, 2013

        Summer is fast approaching and we find ourselves answering a number of questions regarding the coverage of seasonal workers in employee benefit plans. For employers planning to ramp up hiring for the summer season we offer this brief review of the treatment of seasonal employees for purposes of your employee benefit plans, with emphasis on issues under the Affordable Care Act.

        Health Plans

        The Affordable Care Act requires “large employers” to offer affordable health care coverage to all full-time employees and their children (but not their spouses) beginning with the first plan year on or after January 1, 2014, or pay a penalty. For this purpose, a “large employer” is an employer that employed an average of 50 or more full-time employees or full-time equivalent employees during the preceding year. A “full-time employee” is an individual who is employed an average of at least 30 hours per week or 130 hours per month. “Full-time equivalent employees” (FTEs) are calculated by taking the aggregate number of service hours of non-full time employees during the month and dividing by 120. Importantly, the number of full-time employees and FTEs is determined on a controlled group basis, so all individuals employed by the organizations that are members of the controlled group (for example, a parent company and its subsidiaries) are treated as being employed by a single employer.

        All employees, even those who may only work for part of the year, must be included in the count of full-time employees unless they truly are “seasonal” and fall within the fairly narrow definition provided under long-standing Department of Labor regulation 29 CFR § 502.10(b)(3)(ii)(A), as amplified by 26 USC § 4980H(c)(2)(B)(ii). (Guidance issued by both IRS and DOL under the Affordable Care Act confirms that these regulations continue to application and there is no indication that they regulations are likely to be revised in the near future.) Under proposed IRS regulations an employee may be considered a seasonal employee and disregarded for purposes of the head count if he or she: (1) was employed for no more than 120 days (or four months) during the preceding calendar year; and (2) performed labor of a type that is exclusively performed during certain periods or seasons and is not of a type performed continuously during the year. Under this definition blueberry pickers and retail employees employed exclusively during the holiday season should be considered seasonal employees, but extra wait staff hired by a year round restaurant during the high season generally will not. We recommend that any employer with a non-seasonal workforce (including FTEs) of 50 or fewer individuals take a close look at the rules regarding seasonal workers because it may be able to avoid large employer status by applying the seasonal employee exclusion.For further information about how these rules work, we recommend this set of Questions and Answers published by the IRS.

        Remember that temporary and part time employees are counted only for purposes of determining how many FTEs an employer has (and, therefore, will affect the determination of large employer status). They need not, however, be offered health insurance coverage (because they are not full-time employees) and they are not counted in computing the penalty.

        Retirement Plans

        Seasonal employee participation in a company’s retirement plans depends upon the terms of the plan. In general and as explained in an oft-cited IRS Field Directive from 1994, a plan may not include a blanket exclusion of part-time, temporary, or seasonal employees. That is because such employees could very easily accumulate the number of hours of service required for participation. Therefore, if a seasonal employee works the minimum hours required by the plan during the year (typically 1,000 hours) then he or she may be eligible for participation unless some other non-hours based exclusion applies.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Media Mentions

        Steven Davis Featured in the Environmental Business Journal

        Steven Davis, President of Verrill Strategic Consulting, was recently interviewed and featured in the Environmental Business Journal, Volume 39...
        Blog

        What is a Bonus for Purposes of ERISA?

        An ongoing dispute about a Department of Labor advisory opinion published last September raises a basic but unanswered question under the ERISA: What...
        Media Mentions

        Verrill Recognized by WMTW for Partnership Supporting Hunger Relief in Maine

        Verrill was recently featured in coverage by WMTW News 8 for its role in a collaborative effort to combat food insecurity across southern...
        Press Releases

        33 Verrill Attorneys, Across Four Offices, Recognized in the 2026 Chambers USA Guide

        BOSTON, Massachusetts, PORTLAND, Maine, WESTPORT, Connecticut, and WASHINGTON, D.C. – Verrill has been recognized as a Leading Firm in 14...
        Blog

        Will the Knicks Beat the Spurs? (Are Prediction Market Event Contracts Gambling?)

        For those of you who like to keep score, currently 18 states are engaged in litigation over prediction markets, such as Kalshi and Polymarket,...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Faster Review and Enhanced Enforcement for Benefits-Fraud FCA Matters

        On May 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Division issued a new memorandum, “Accelerating Review and Enhancing Enforcement in...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        DOJ Announces Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown; Signals Intensified Medicaid Enforcement Nationwide

        On May 21, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a first-of-its kind Minnesota Health Care Fraud Takedown charging 15 defendants, including...
        Media Mentions

        Lauren Galvin Quoted in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly on Arbitration and Anti-SLAPP Protections

        Verrill Partner Lauren Galvin was recently featured in a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article highlighting a notable Superior Court decision...
        Blog

        Section 530A Accounts: What Employers Should Consider Before Offering Contributions to “Trump” Accounts

        Section 530A accounts, commonly referred to as Trump accounts, have attracted attention since the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in...
        Blog

        Navigating PBM Reform: Regulatory Changes, Market Shifts, and Practical Guidance for ERISA Fiduciaries

        Pharmacy Benefit Manager (“PBM”) arrangements have long relied on rebates with limited transparency into true drug costs. Recent regulatory and...
        Blog

        DOL’s Proposed Regulation on Selecting Alternative Investments: Broad Implications for 401(k) and 403(b) Plan Fiduciaries

        On March 30, 2026, the Department of Labor issued a proposed regulation purporting to implement an executive order to expand access to “alternative...
        Press Releases

        Verrill Welcomes Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Attorney Gracie Castle

        BOSTON, Massachusetts – Verrill is pleased to welcome Gracie Castle to the firm’s Private Clients & Fiduciary Services Group as an Associate,...