Benefits Law Update
        Practical advice from Verrill attorneys

        Year-End Amendments for 457(b) Plans—A Reminder

        by William D. Jewett on December 8, 2025

        Non-governmental employers that sponsor Section 457(b) deferred compensation plans should be mindful that December 31, 2025, is the deadline for plan amendments to reflect changes in law included in the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (“SECURE 2.0”), if their plan has put the changes into effect operationally before that date.

        IRS Notice 2024-02 extended the SECURE 2.0 amendment deadline to the end of 2026 for most qualified plans and 403(b) plans, to the end of 2028 for collectively bargained plans, and to the end of 2029 for governmental plans. However, these extensions were not made applicable to 457(b) plans maintained by non-governmental employers. For non-governmental 457(b) plans, the amendment deadline remains the last day of the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2025, as set forth in the statute. For calendar year plans, this is December 31, 2025.

        The SECURE 2.0 changes that have most commonly been put into effect for such plans are (i) an increase in the small balance distribution limit from $5,000 to $7,000 and (ii) an increase in the required minimum distribution age from age 72 under the SECURE Act of 2019 (“SECURE Act”) to age 72 for participants born between July 1, 1949 and December 31, 1950, and age 73 for participants born between January 1, 1951 and December 31, 1959. If a calendar year non-governmental 457(b) plan has operationalized either change, or both, a plan amendment will be needed to reflect the relevant changes by December 31, 2025, including the effective date for each change. Many plan sponsors are also increasing the required minimum distribution age to 75 for participants born on or after January 1, 1960, even though those participants will not reach age 75 for many years.

        Other changes in a plan’s required minimum distribution provisions may also be needed to reflect recent changes in law. However, many 457(b) plans of non-governmental employers do not include detailed minimum distribution language but instead undertake in a general way to comply with the requirements of the minimum distribution rules. Plans that take this approach normally will not need to be amended for these other changes in law.[1]

        Note that 457(b) plans of non-governmental employers are permitted, but not required, to raise their small balance distribution limit and their required minimum distribution ages as described. If a plan has implemented the increases, an amendment will be needed. However, an employer could decide to stick with the old small balance distribution limit and/or not to update its required minimum distribution age. If a plan were to continue using age 72 (or even age 70½, the pre-SECURE Act age) as its required minimum distribution age, it would necessarily comply with a rule that calls for plans to include a provision requiring distributions to start not later than age 73.

        Finally, 457(b) plans of non-governmental employers are also permitted, but not required, to allow in-service distributions to participants who have attained age 70½. An employer with a plan that allows such distributions could choose to change the in-service distribution age to keep pace with the required minimum distribution age, or it could stick with age 70½. Many employers with plans that allow age 70½ in-service distributions decide to leave this provision as is.

        If you need assistance with year-end amendments for a non-governmental 457(b) plan, please contact William Jewett or any member of Verrill’s Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.


        [1] For example, SECURE 2.0 gives the surviving spouse of a participant who dies before distributions begin an election to be treated as if the surviving spouse were the participant and wait until the date the participant would have attained the applicable age to begin taking required minimum distributions. Non-governmental 457(b) plans seldom spell out the required minimum distribution rules in this level of detail, and most have no need to incorporate this rule because they provide for payment in a single sum upon the participant’s death.

        Benefits Law Update

        Verrill’s Benefits Law Update blog delivers timely insights and practical guidance on the ever-evolving landscape of employee benefits and executive compensation. Our blog provides up-to-date analysis and commentary on a wide range of topics, including timely updates on developments in law affecting employee benefit plans and executive compensation arrangements.

        Key Contacts

        Subscribe

        Looking for more great content? Subscribe for regular legal updates and information delivered right to your inbox.

        Firm Highlights

        Published Works

        Four Verrill Attorneys Co-Author Massachusetts Trends and Developments Chapter for Chambers and Partners Child Relocation 2026 Guide

        Verrill attorneys Mary H. Schmidt, Rachel A. Deering, Hannah R. Zukoff, and Mariah G. Tappan co-authored the “Trends and Developments” chapter...
        Blog

        A New Protected Class in Maine: Holders of Final Protection Orders

        In the lead-up to Domestic Violence Awareness Month in October, employers may be taking a closer look at how their policies and practices respond to...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        Verrill Secures SJC Victory for Boston Legacy FC in White Stadium Litigation

        Verrill has secured a significant appellate victory for Boston Legacy FC in the litigation challenging the redevelopment of White Stadium in...
        Blog

        Hurry Up and Wait

        This is the third in a series of Verrill blog posts on Maine’s packaging extended producer responsibility (“EPR”) law[1]. In July we reported...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses First Brands Chapter 11 Case in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach was recently quoted in a Law360 article examining the rejection of First Brands Group's Chapter 11 plan and the...
        Media Mentions

        Cybersecurity and AI Governance: Scott Anderson Featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly

        Verrill Managing Partner Scott Anderson was recently featured in Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly discussing how law firms can build attorney buy-in for...
        Blog

        Section 530A Account Update: ERISA Status of Trump Accounts

        The Department of Labor has issued important guidance addressing whether employer programs that permit contributions to Section 530A accounts (and...
        Press Releases

        97 Verrill Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers® 2027, Including Four Named Lawyers of the Year

        AUGUSTA, Maine, BANGOR, Maine, BOSTON, Mass., PORTLAND, Maine, and WESTPORT, Conn., (August 20, 2026) – Verrill is proud to announce that 97...
        Alerts and Newsletters

        SEC’s Proposed “Reg Crypto”: What Founders Need to Know

        Startup founders and emerging-growth companies have a number of options for raising capital under the federal securities laws, including Regulation D...
        Blog

        After 45 Years, the IRS Speaks on DCAP Nondiscrimination Testing – And It’s Good News

        Employers that provide a Dependent Care Assistance Program will be pleased to learn that for the first time in 45 years, the IRS has issued guidance...
        Media Mentions

        U.S. Courts Highlights Annabel Rodriguez’s Journey from Fellow to Mentor

        Verrill attorney Annabel Rodriguez was featured in a recent U.S. Courts article titled “From Fellows to Mentors: Alumni Share Lasting Lessons from...
        Media Mentions

        Robert Keach Discusses Bankruptcy Auction Strategy in Law360

        Verrill attorney Robert Keach spoke with Law360 article examining the complex bankruptcy auction process that resulted in the sale of 23 summer...